Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/032,771

FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL AND COMPONENT FOR EXHAUST GAS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 19, 2023
Examiner
HILL, STEPHANI A
Art Unit
1735
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nippon Steel Stainless Steel Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
29%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 6m
To Grant
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 29% of cases
29%
Career Allow Rate
107 granted / 369 resolved
-36.0% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+43.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
87 currently pending
Career history
456
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 369 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of a certified copy of JP 2020-178302 filed October 23, 2020 as required by 37 CFR 1.55. Receipt is also acknowledged of WO 2022/085788, the WIPO publication of PCT/JP 2021/039115 filed October 22, 2021. Response to Restriction Election Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-4, 7, and 8, drawn to a ferritic stainless steel composition with surface oxides in the reply filed on December 1, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 5, 6, and 9-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected inventive group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Status This Office Action is in response to Applicant’s Claims filed April 19, 2023. Claims Filing Date April 19, 2023 Amended 3, 4, 6 New 7-14 Pending 1-14 Withdrawn 5, 6, 9-14 Under Examination 1-4, 7, 8 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4, 7, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ugi (JP H06-235100 machine translation) in view of JP ‘880 (JP H05-271880 machine translation). Regarding claim 1, Ugi discloses a ferritic stainless steel ([0001]) with an overlapping composition ([0006]-[0013]). In the case where the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art” a prima facie case of obviousness exists. MPEP 2144.05(I). Ugi is silent to 0.01 mass% or more and 0.50 mass% or less of Ni, 0.002 mass% or more and 0.200 mass% or less of Al, and 0 mass% or more and 0.500 mass% or less Ti. JP ‘880 discloses a ferritic stainless steel ([0001], [0007]) with 0.01 mass% or more and 0.50 mass% or less of Ni (1.0% or less) ([0019]), 0.002 mass% or more and 0.200 mass% or less of Al (0.01 to 0.5%) ([0022]), and 0 mass% or more and 0.500 mass% or less Ti (0.05 to 0.3% Ti) ([0024]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in the ferritic stainless steel of Ugi to include 1.0% or less Ni to improve toughness without increasing the cost (JP ‘880 [0019]) and 0.01 to 0.5% Al with 0.05 to 0.3% Ti to inhibit corrosion by forming an Al-enriched layer in the passivation film by annealing and pickling that improves weather resistance without deteriorating surface quality, weldability, and localized corrosion (JP ‘880 [0022], [0024]). In the case where the claimed ranges “overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art” a prima facie case of obviousness exists. MPEP 2144.05(I). Element Claim 1 Ugi Disclosure Ugi Citation Si 0.05 to 2.50 0.3 to 3.0 [0008] Mn 0.05 to 1.50 0.3 or less [0009] C 0.025 or less 0.1 or less [0007] P 0.040 or less - - S 0.003 or less - - N 0.025 or less Below 0.1 [0012] Ni 0.01 to 0.50 - - Cr 10.50 to 25.00 11 to 30 [0010] Cu 0.01 to 1.80 0.1 to 1.0 [0011] Al 0.002 to 0.200 - - Nb 0.001 to 1.00 0.1 to 1.0 [0013] Fe Remainder Balance [0006] Ugi discloses at least one type of oxides of oxides containing 5 mass% or more of Al and oxides containing 5 mass% or more of Si are present on a surface (producing and concentrating SiO2, silicon oxide, on the surface) ([0005], [0008], [0014]-[0017]). JP ‘880 discloses at least one type of oxides of oxides containing 5 mass% or more of Al and oxides containing 5 mass% or more of Si are present on a surface (Al-enriched layer is easily formed in the passivation film) ([0022], [0024], [0029]-[0033]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art for the steel of Ugi in view of JP ‘880 to include both silicon oxide and Al-enriched oxide in the passive layer because the composition and processing forms both (Ugi [0005], [0008], [0014]-[0017]; JP ‘880 [0022], [0024], [0029]-[0033]). The limitation of among the oxides present on the surface, the number of oxides having a diameter D of 0.1 um or more and 2.0 um or less being 10 or more per 93 um2, the diameter D being represented by the following formula (1) D= (Dmax + Dmin)/2 -- (1) in the formula (1), Dmax is a maximum diameter of the oxide on the surface, and Dmin is a minimum diameter of the oxide on the surface, has been considered and determined to recite a property that results from the claimed ferritic steel composition undergoing applicant’s disclosed process (applicant’s specification [0068]-[0080]), where the final annealing step form internal oxides of Al, Si, or the like, and outer layer oxides (applicant’s specification [0074]) and the nitric acid electrolysis removes oxides adhering to the surface, while the internal oxides remain (applicant’s specification [0075]). Ugi discloses a process that is substantially similar to that disclosed by application (Ugi [0015]-[0019]), including overlapping conditions of final (bright) annealing followed by nitric acid electrolysis (Ugi [0015]-[0016]) to concentrate silicon oxide on the surface (Ugi [0005], [0008], [0014]-[0017]). The prior art discloses a substantially similar composition (Ugi [0006]-[0013]; JP ‘880 [0019], [0022], [0024]) and substantially similar processing (Ugi [0015]-[0019]). Therefore, the properties of the claimed invention naturally flow from the disclosure of the prior art, including among the oxides present on the surface, the number of oxides having a diameter D of 0.1 um or more and 2.0 um or less being 10 or more per 93 um2, the diameter D being represented by the following formula (1) D= (Dmax + Dmin)/2 -- (1) in the formula (1), Dmax is a maximum diameter of the oxide on the surface, and Dmin is a minimum diameter of the oxide on the surface. “[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.” MPEP 2144.05(II)(A). Applicant’s Disclosed Process [0068]-[0080] Ugi’s Disclosed Process [0015]-[0019] Pretreatment 1100-1300°C Casting - Hot Rolling Hot Rolling Annealing, optional Annealing First Pickling HCl or HNO3+HF Descaling Cold Rolling Cold Rolling Final Annealing 900-1100°C 30-90 seconds Bright Annealing 950-1050°C 10-100 seconds Nitric Acid Electrolysis 100-150 g/L 50-70°C 100-150 mA/cm2 60-120 seconds Nitric Acid Electrolysis 1-30 wt% (10-300 g/L) 10-60°C 1-100 coulombs/dm2 (10-1000 mA/cm2) - Final Pickling HNO3+HF - Regarding claim 2, regarding the surface, CIE1976 luminosity L* that is measured using a D65 light source in a diffuse lighting mode by receiving light in a direction at 80 with respect to a normal line to the surface at a visual field angle of 100 visual field for a measurement time of one second being 60 or more has been considered and determined to recite a property that results from the claimed ferritic steel composition undergoing applicant’s disclosed process (applicant’s specification [0068]-[0080]), where the nitric acid concentration during nitric acid electrolysis controls the luminosity (applicant’s specification [0076]) and the final pickling step of immersion in a liquid mixture of nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid improves the luminosity (applicant’s specification [0080]). The process of Ugi ([0015]-[0019]) discloses an overlapping nitric acid concentration ([0017]), but is silent to final pickling. JP ‘880 discloses annealing, nitric acid electrolysis, then final pickling in a mixed acid solution of nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid ([0031]-[0033]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art in the process of Ugi to final pickle in a mixed acid solution of nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid to remove porous oxide scale to achieve sufficient corrosion and weather resistance (JP ‘880 [0033]). Therefore, the prior art discloses a substantially similar composition (Ugi [0006]-[0013]; JP ‘880 [0019], [0022], [0024]) and substantially similar processing (Ugi [0015]-[0019]; JP ‘880 [0031]-[0033]), such that the properties of the claimed invention naturally flow from the prior art disclosure, including regarding the surface, CIE1976 luminosity L* that is measured using a D65 light source in a diffuse lighting mode by receiving light in a direction at 80 with respect to a normal line to the surface at a visual field angle of 100 visual field for a measurement time of one second being 60 or more. “[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.” MPEP 2144.05(II)(A). Regarding claim 3, Ugi in view of JP ‘880 discloses 0.001 mass% or more and 0.500 mass% or less Ti (0.05 to 0.3% Ti) (JP ‘880 [0024]). Regarding claim 4, Ugi in view of JP ‘880 discloses the passive film inhibits red rust (JP ‘880 [0006]) such that it has excellent weather resistance (JP ‘880 [0007], [0048]). The limitation of in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2), has been considered and determined to recite a property of the claimed ferritic stainless steel. The prior art discloses a substantially similar composition (Ugi [0006]-[0013]; JP ‘880 [0019], [0022], [0024]) and substantially similar processing (Ugi [0015]-[0019]), such that the properties of the claimed invention naturally flow from the disclosure of the prior art, including in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2). Regarding claim 7, Ugi in view of JP ‘880 discloses the passive film inhibits red rust (JP ‘880 [0006]) such that it has excellent weather resistance (JP ‘880 [0007], [0048]). The limitation of in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2), has been considered and determined to recite a property of the claimed ferritic stainless steel. The prior art discloses a substantially similar composition (Ugi [0006]-[0013]; JP ‘880 [0019], [0022], [0024]) and substantially similar processing (Ugi [0015]-[0019]; JP ‘880 [0031]-[0033]), such that the properties of the claimed invention naturally flow from the disclosure of the prior art, including in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2). Regarding claim 8, Ugi in view of JP ‘880 discloses the passive film inhibits red rust (JP ‘880 [0006]) such that it has excellent weather resistance (JP ‘880 [0007], [0048]). The limitation of in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2), has been considered and determined to recite a property of the claimed ferritic stainless steel. The prior art discloses a substantially similar composition (Ugi [0006]-[0013]; JP ‘880 [0019], [0022], [0024]) and substantially similar processing (Ugi [0015]-[0019]), such that the properties of the claimed invention naturally flow from the disclosure of the prior art, including in a range from the surface to 1.0 um after the ferritic stainless steel is held in an atmosphere of 300°C to 900°C for 100 hours or longer, when a Cr content is represented by [Cr], a Si content is represented by [Si] and an Al content is represented by [Al] by unit mass%, the following formula (2) being satisfied, [Cr] + [Si] + [Al] > 18.0 ... (2). Related Art Hamada (JP 2012-112025 machine translation) Hamada discloses a ferritic stainless steel ([0001], [0020]) with an overlapping composition ([0025], [0032]-[0045]), substantially similar processing ([0048], [0056]-[0062]), and concentration of Al in the surface passivation film ([0024]). Element Claim 1 Hamada Disclosure Hamada Citation Si 0.05 to 2.50 0.5 or less [0034] Mn 0.05 to 1.50 0.5 or less [0035] C 0.025 or less 0.0101 or less [0032] P 0.040 or less - - S 0.003 or less - - N 0.025 or less 0.020 or less [0033] Ni 0.01 to 0.50 3 or less [0042] Cr 10.50 to 25.00 10.0 to 20.0 [0036] Cu 0.01 to 1.80 1.5 or less [0041] Al 0.002 to 0.200 0.03 to 0.5 [0039] Nb 0.001 to 1.00 0.05 or less [0040] Fe Remainder Remainder [0025] Ti 0.05 to 0.30 [0037] Mo 1.5 or less [0038] V 1 or less [0043] Sn 0.5 or less [0044] B 0.0020 or less [0045] Applicant’s Disclosed Process [0068]-[0080] Hamada’s Disclosed Process [0048], [0056]-[0062] Pretreatment 1100-1300°C Casting Casting Hot Rolling Hot Rolling Annealing, optional - First Pickling HCl or HNO3+HF Pickling Cold Rolling Cold Rolling Final Annealing 900-1100°C 30-90 seconds Annealing 850-950°C - Nitric Acid Electrolysis 100-150 g/L concentration 50-70°C 100-150 mA/cm2 current density 60-120 seconds Pickling in Nitric Acid 50 to 200 g/L 50-80°C - 4-100 seconds Final Pickling HNO3+HF - JP ‘595 (JP H01-234595 machine translation) JP ‘595 discloses a ferritic stainless steel (p. 1) with a similar composition (Table 1) manufactured by bright annealing to increase Si oxide then nitric acid electrolysis to selectively dissolve manganese oxide (p. 2). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHANI HILL whose telephone number is (571)272-2523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-12pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KEITH WALKER can be reached at 571-272-3458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHANI HILL/Examiner, Art Unit 1735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603203
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING Sm-Fe-N MAGNET, Sm-Fe-N MAGNET, AND MOTOR HAVING Sm-Fe-N MAGNET
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12580124
GRAIN BOUNDARY DIFFUSION METHOD FOR BULK RARE EARTH PERMANENT MAGNETIC MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565689
FERRITIC STAINLESS STEEL HAVING IMPROVED MAGNETIZATION, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12540385
PRODUCTION METHOD FOR METAL PLATES FOR VAPOR DEPOSITION MASKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12515254
Process for the additive manufacturing of maraging steels
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
29%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+43.4%)
4y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 369 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month