Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/033,453

Battery Pack and Device Including the Same

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Examiner
CHMIELECKI, SCOTT J
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
603 granted / 761 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
790
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 761 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. § 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the cooling part” in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purposes of examination, the limitation will be interpreted to recite “the cooling port.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. § 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Park (US 2019/0319318 A1) in view of Albrecht et al. (US 2019/0275911 A1), hereinafter “Albrecht.” Regarding claim 1, Park discloses a battery pack comprising: a battery module (¶ [0033]; Fig. 1, reference no. 100) that includes a battery cell stack in which a plurality of battery cells are stacked, in this case a plurality of battery packs are arranged within the battery module (¶ [0033]), a module frame that houses the battery cell stack, in this case the cover (¶ [0033]; Fig. 1, reference no. 110), and a heat sink located below the module frame, in this case the first cooling plate (¶ [0033]; Fig. 1, reference no. 121), having a through hole formed therein, in this case the lower connection pipe that extends from the front branch (¶ [0047] & [0075]; Figs. 2, 3, 6, 9, & 10, reference nos. 150 & 153A); a pack pipe assembly configured to receive a flow of coolant, in this case a cooling medium flows within the coolant pipes (¶ [0044] & [0047]; Fig. 6, reference nos. 171-173); a cooling port that is connected to the through hole and including an inclination part formed on an outer peripheral surface of the cooling port, in this case the upper connection pipe (¶ [0075]; Figs. 9, & 10, reference no. 153B), that includes an inclination part formed on the outer peripheral surface of the cooling part, in this case the first upper connection unit (¶ [0076]; Figs. 9 & 10, reference no. 153B-1); a cooling connector that connects the pack refrigerant pipe assembly and the cooling port, in this case the first connection member (¶ [0076]; Figs. 9 & 10, reference no. 153C), the inclination part have a width in a horizontal direction that narrows in the direction towards the cooling connector, in this case the first upper connection unit narrows towards the first connecting member (see annotated Fig. 10, reference nos. 153B-1 & 153C-2, below); and a ring-shaped sealing member located between the inclination part and the cooling connector, in this case the first sealing unit includes a portion positioned between the first upper connection unit and the first core member (¶ [0080]; Fig. 10, reference nos. 153B-1, 153C-2, &153C-3). Park does not disclose that refrigerant flows within the pipes. However, Albrecht teaches that refrigerant may be used as a cooling medium for batteries (¶ [0010]. One having ordinary skill in the art would have realized that employing refrigerant as the cooling medium would have facilitated battery pack temperature control (see ¶ [0007]), thereby facilitating improved battery pack operation and safety. Therefore, it would have been obvious to have selected refrigerant as the cooling medium in order to have facilitated improved battery pack operation and safety. PNG media_image1.png 565 732 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Park further discloses that the inclination part has a truncated cone-shaped inclined surface, in this case the first upper connection unit narrows towards the first connection member (see Figs. 9 & 10, reference no. 153). Regarding claim 3, Park further discloses that the cooling connector includes a recess in which the cooling port and the sealing member are disposed, in this case the first lower connection unit (¶ [0075]; Fig. 10, reference no. 153A-1) surrounds the sealing member (see Fig. 10, reference no. 153C-3) which in turn surrounds the cooling port (see annotated Fig. 10, above). Regarding claim 4, Park further discloses that the sealing member is located between an inner surface of the cooling connector defined within the recess, in this case the interior layer of the first sealing unit (see Fig. 10, reference no. 153C-3) is positioned on the interior surface of the first shell member (see Fig. 10, reference no. 153C-2), and an outer peripheral surface of the inclination part (see Fig. 10, reference nos. 153C-3 and 153B-1). Regarding claim 5, Park further discloses that the inner surface of the cooling connector includes an inclination passage part that the sealing member contacts, in this case the wider portion of the “Y” portion formed by the first sealing unit and the first body unit (see ¶ [0080]; see also Fig. 10, reference nos. 153C-2 & 153C-3). Regarding claim 6, Park further discloses that the inclination passage part becomes smaller in inner diameter in a direction towards a lower side of the cooling connector and conforms to the shape of the inclination part, in this case the passage narrows in the connection direction and has a conformal shape (see annotated Fig. 10, above). Regarding claim 7, Park further discloses that the sealing member is located between an inner surface of the inclination passage part and the outer peripheral surface of the inclination part, in this case the first sealing unit is located between the “Y” portion and the first upper connection unit (see Fig. 10, reference nos. 153A-1, 153C-3, & 153B-1). Regarding claim 8, Park further discloses that the through hole is a first through hole and is an inlet port and the cooling port is a first cooling port and is connected to the inlet port, the battery pack further comprising a second through hole that is an outlet port and a second cooling port connected to the outlet port, in this case there are identical through holes and associated components allowing cooling medium to flow in and out via the external connection pipe ((¶ [0047]; see Fig. 6, reference nos. 153 & 190). Regarding claim 9, Park further discloses that the pack refrigerant pipe assembly includes supply and discharge pipes, in this case the external connection pipe includes a pipe for cooling medium flowing in and flowing out (¶ [0047]; Fig. 6, reference no. 190 & arrows). Regarding claim 10, Park further discloses that the cooling connector is a first cooling connector and the cooling port is a first cooling port, the battery pack further comprising a second cooling connector connected to a second cooling port, and the battery pack is configured such that the refrigerant flowing along the pack refrigerant supply pipe flows into the heat sink through the first cooling connector, the first cooling port, and the inlet port, in this case there are identical through holes and associated components allowing cooling medium to flow in and out via the external connection pipe ((¶ [0047]; see Fig. 6, reference nos. 153 & 190). Regarding claim 11, Park further discloses that the battery pack is configured such that the refrigerant is discharged our of the heat sink to the pack refrigerant discharge pipe through the outlet port, the second cooling port, and the second cooling connector, in this case there are identical through holes and associated components allowing cooling medium to flow in and out via the external connection pipe ((¶ [0047]; see Fig. 6, reference nos. 153 & 190). Regarding claim 12, Park further discloses that the heat sink includes a lower plate joined to a bottom part of the module frame, in this case the first cooling plate (¶ [0033]; Fig. 1, reference no. 121) includes the fixing block (¶ [0057]; Fig. 7, reference no. 180), and a depressed part recessed downward from the lower plate, in this case the portions where the cooling pipes are positioned in the lower unit (¶ [0061]; Fig. 7, reference no. 182). Regarding claim 13, Park further discloses that the through hole is formed in the depressed part, in this case the first cooling plate (¶ [0033]; Fig. 1, reference no. 121) includes the front branch unit (¶ [0047]; Fig. 3, reference no. 150) where the through hole is placed. Regarding claim 14, Park further discloses that the battery pack is configured to receive flow of the refrigerant between the bottom part and the depressed part, in this case the flow paths are formed in the fixing block (¶ [0050]; Fig. 7, reference nos. 171A, 171B, & 180). Regarding claim 15, Park further discloses a device (¶ [0003]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT J CHMIELECKI whose telephone number is (571)272-7641. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at (571) 272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT J. CHMIELECKI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 24, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592421
BATTERY PACK, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586838
BATTERY PACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573634
SILICON-CONTAINING ELECTRODES AND METHODS FOR PREPARING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573641
FUEL CELL STACK INCLUDING A SEPARATOR HAVING A GAS EQUAL DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571109
FUEL CELL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 761 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month