Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/033,703

AN INDUCTOR COIL

Non-Final OA §101§102§103§DP
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Examiner
HOSSAIN, KAZI S
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Eta Green Power Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
485 granted / 610 resolved
+11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
644
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
66.6%
+26.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101./ Claims 1-25 provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1-25 of co-pending Application No. 18/033698. This is a provisional statutory double patenting rejection since the claims directed to the same invention have not in fact been patented. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 8-12, 20 and 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kambe (JP 2019-046983 A). Regarding Claim 1: Kambe teaches that an inductor coil (1, Fig. 1; para 0018-0023), comprising: a first component (2A, Fig. 3); a second component (2B); a length of conductor (4); a heat sink (5, 6, formed the heat sink in Fig. 1; para 0018); wherein, the first component is located adjacent to the second component; wherein, a core (2) is formed from the first component and the second component; wherein, a first part of the length (i.e. length of coil 4) of conductor is wound around at least the core to form a plurality of turns of conductor; wherein, the heat sink comprises a thermally conductive material (see para 0018); wherein, the heat sink comprises a first part (6) and a second part (5); wherein, the first part of the heat sink has a first material (i.e. thermally conductive resin; para 0018) and/or structural characteristic and the second part of the heat sink has a second material (i.e. iron) and/or structural characteristic different to the first material and/or structural characteristic; and wherein, an inner surface (i.e. inner surface of 6 in Fig. 1) of the first part of the heat sink is in contact with an outer surface (i.e. outer surface of 4 in Fig. 1) of a part of the plurality of turns of conductor. Regarding Claim 2: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that the first material or structural characteristic comprises a magnetic permeability i.e. permeability of thermally conductive resin) and the second material or structural characteristic comprises a magnetic permeability (i.e. permeability of iron) greater than the magnetic permeability of the first part of the heat sink (it is known that iron has the highest permeability than any other materials). Regarding Claim 3: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that first material or structural characteristic comprises a resistance (i.e. resistance of thermally conductive resin) or resistivity and the second material or structural characteristic comprises a resistance (ice, resistance of iron) or resistivity less than the resistance or resistivity of the first part of the heat sink (it is known that iron has lower resistance than insulating resin material). Regarding Claim 8: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that the first part of the heat sink has a thickness (i.e. thickness of 6 in horizontal direction in fig. 1 ) an axial direction (i.e. horizontal direction in Fig. 1) of the core that is less than a thickness (i.e. thickness of 5 in horizontal direction in fig. 1 )of the second part of the heat sink in the axial direction of the core (construed from Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 9: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that the first part of the heat sink comprises a plurality of slots (7 or 8; Fig. 7-8) or grooves. Regarding Claim 10: As applied to claim 9, Kambe teaches that the plurality of slots or grooves extend to the inner surface of the first part of the heat sink (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 11: As applied to claim 9, Kambe teaches that the plurality of slots or grooves extend to a boundary between the first part of the heat sink and the second part of the heat sink (see Fig. 8). Regarding Claim 12: As applied to claim 9, Kambe teaches that the plurality of slots or grooves each have a longitudinal axis (axis of 8 in Fig. 8) that intersects with a central axis (i.e. axis of the core 2 in Fig. 2) of the core. Regarding Claim 20: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that the first part and second part of the heat sink extend substantially in a direction perpendicular to a central axis of the core (construed from Fig. 1). Regarding Claim 23: Kambe teaches that an inductor coil (1, Fig. 1; para 0018-0023), comprising: a first component (2A, Fig. 3); a second component (2B); a length of conductor (4); a heat sink (5, 6, formed the heat sink in Fig. 1; para 0018); wherein, the first component is located adjacent to the second component; wherein, a core (2) is formed from the second component; wherein, a first part of the length (i.e. length of coil 4) of conductor is wound around at least the core to form a plurality of turns of conductor; wherein, the heat sink comprises a thermally conductive material (see para 0018); wherein, the heat sink comprises a first part (6) and a second part (5); wherein, the first part of the heat sink has a first material i.e. thermally conductive resin; para 0018) and/or structural characteristic and the second part of the heat sink has a second material (i.e. iron) and/or structural characteristic different to the first material and/or structural characteristic; and wherein, an inner surface (i.e. inner surface of 6 in Fig. 1) of the first part of the heat sink is in contact with an outer surface (i.e. outer surface of 4 in Fig. 1) of a part of the plurality of turns of conductor. Regarding Claim 24: Kambe teaches that a method of cooling an inductor coil (1, Fig. 1; para 0018-0023), wherein the inductor coil comprises: a first component (2A, Fig. 3); a second component (2B); a length of conductor (4); wherein, the first component is located adjacent to the second component; wherein, a core (2) is formed from the first component and the second component; wherein, a first part of the length (i.e. length of coil 4) of conductor is wound around at least the core to form a plurality of turns of conductor; and wherein the method comprises: utilizing a heat sink (5, 6, formed the heat sink; para 0018), wherein, the heat sink comprises a thermally conductive material (see para 0018); wherein, the heat sink comprises a first part (6) and a second part (5); wherein, the first part of the heat sink has a first material (ice, thermally conductive resin; para 0018) and/or structural characteristic and the second part of the heat sink has a second material (i.e. iron) and/or structural characteristic different to the first material and/or structural characteristic; and wherein, utilizing the heat sink comprises contacting an inner surface (i.e. inner surface of 6 in Fig. 1) of the first part of the heat sink is with an outer surface (i.e. outer surface of 4 in Fig. 1) of a part of the plurality of turns of conductor. Regarding Claim 25: Kambe teaches that a method of cooling an inductor coil (1, Fig. 1; para 0018-0023), wherein the inductor coil comprises: a first component (2A, Fig. 3); a second component (2B); a length of conductor (4); wherein, the first component is located adjacent to the second component; wherein, a core (2) is formed from the second component; wherein, a first part of the length (i.e. length of coil 4) of conductor is wound around at least the core to form a plurality of turns of conductor; and wherein the method comprises: utilizing a heat sink (5, 6, formed the heat sink; para 0018), wherein, the heat sink comprises a thermally conductive material (see para 0018); wherein, the heat sink comprises a first part (6) and a second part (5); wherein, the first part of the heat sink has a first material (ice, thermally conductive resin; para 0018) and/or structural characteristic and the second part of the heat sink has a second material (i.e. iron) and/or structural characteristic different to the first material and/or structural characteristic; and wherein, utilizing the heat sink comprises contacting an inner surface (i.e. inner surface of 6 in Fig. 1) of the first part of the heat sink is with an outer surface (i.e. outer surface of 4 in Fig. 1) of a part of the plurality of turns of conductor. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 13-15 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kambe in view of Tsuchida (US 20200194160 A1). Regarding Claim 13: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches that the second part of the heat sink except the second part of the heat sink is configured to connect to a printed circuit board. However, Tsuchida teaches that the second part (40) of the heat sink except the second part of the heat sink is configured to connect to a printed circuit board (11, Fig.3; para 0035). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the second part of the heat sink is configured to connect to a printed circuit board to provide a flexible base that mechanically supports and electrically connects components like resistors and chips. Regarding Claim 14: As applied to claim 1, Kambe teaches the heat sink except least one third part located on at opposite side of the second part of the heat sink to the first part of the heat sink, and wherein the at least one third part of the heat sink is configured to transfer heat away from the second part of the heat sink However, Tsuchida teaches that the heat sink comprises at least one third part (43; para 0054) located on at opposite side of the second part of the heat sink to the first part of the heat sink, and wherein the at least one third part of the heat sink is configured to transfer heat away from the second part of the heat sink. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have least one third part located on at opposite side of the second part of the heat sink to the first part of the heat sink, and wherein the at least one third part of the heat sink is configured to transfer heat away from the second part of the heat sink which helps it move heat out of the system more quickly. Regarding Claim 15: As applied to claim 1, the modified Kambe teaches that a third part of the at least one third part the heat sink comprises a finned structured (construed from Tsuchida’s Fig. 3). Regarding Claim 19: As applied to claim 1, the modified Kambe teaches the second part of the heat sink except the second part of the heat sink comprises one or more pins configured for mechanical alignment with a printed circuit board or for mechanical fixation to the printed circuit board. However, Tsuchida teaches that the second part (40) of the heat sink comprises one or more pins (43) configured for mechanical alignment with a printed circuit board (11, Fig.3; para 0035) or for mechanical fixation to the printed circuit board It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the second part of the heat sink comprises one or more pins configured for mechanical alignment with a printed circuit board or for mechanical fixation to the printed circuit board to provide a flexible base that mechanically supports and electrically connects components like resistors and chips. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7, 16-18 and 21-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 4 recites, a circumferential resistance of the first part of the heat sink is greater than a radial resistance of the first part of the heat sink, and wherein the circumferential resistance of the first part of the heat sink is greater than a radial resistance of the second part of the heat sink and is greater than a circumferential resistance of the second part of the heat sink. Claim 16 recites, a third part of the at least one third part the heat sink comprises a connection terminal. Claim 21 recites, a core portion of the first component is spaced from a core portion of the second component to form a gap in the core; wherein the first part of the length of conductor is wound around the core and the gap in the core; wherein an inner part of the conductor of two or more turns of the conductor located around the core are spaced from a central axis of the core by at least one first distance; and wherein an inner part of the conductor of one or more turns of the conductor located around the gap in the core is spaced from the central axis by at least one second distance greater than the at least one first distance. Claim 22 recites, a core portion of the first component is spaced from a core portion of the second component to form a gap in the core; wherein a spacer is located in the gap in the core to form a gap around the core, wherein an outer surface of a portion of the spacer is located a distance from a central axis of the core that is greater than a distance from the central axis to an outer surface of the first component and an outer surface of the second component that form the core The references of record do not teach or suggest the aforementioned limitations, nor would it be obvious to modify those references to include such limitations. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” , Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kazi Hossain whose telephone number is 571-272-8182. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from Monday to Thursday 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https:/www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAZI HOSSAIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2837 /SHAWKI S ISMAIL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603220
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597548
INDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586699
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586706
COIL COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580118
MULTI-LAYER INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.3%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month