Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/033,738

LITHIUM MANGANESE IRON PHOSPHATE-BASED ELECTRODE FOR AN ELECTROCHEMICAL LITHIUM ION CELL

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 25, 2023
Examiner
CHAU, LISA N
Art Unit
1785
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Saft
OA Round
2 (Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 10m
To Grant
39%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allow Rate
124 granted / 500 resolved
-40.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
57 currently pending
Career history
557
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.9%
+13.9% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 500 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Examiner acknowledges amended Claims 1 and 4, canceled Claims 2, 3, and 10, and withdrawn Claim 12 in the response filed on 3/13/2026. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to Claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 13-15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Objections Claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 13-15 are objected to because of the following informalities: To promote clarity, please amend “the total weight of all the electrochemically active materials” to “a total weight of all the electrochemically active materials” in Claim 1: Lines 4-5 (emphasis added). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-9, 11, and 13-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pub. No. 20140138591 (“Yoon et al.”) in view of US Pub. No. 20140096375 (“Hampel et al.”). With regards to Claims 1, 4, 7, and 8, Yoon et al. teaches an electrode having a porosity of 10-90 vol % and comprising a current collector formed by a metal strip and two faces, in which at least one of the faces is coated with a composition of electrochemically active materials ([0156] and [0157]), said composition comprising: from 90% to 99% by weight of lithium manganese iron phosphate relative to the total weight of all the electrochemically active materials of the composition, said lithium manganese iron phosphate having the following formula: LiaFe1-x-yMnxDy(PO4)z, wherein 1.0<a≤1.10, 0<x≤0.5, 0≤y≤0.10, 1.0<z≤1.10 and D is selected from the group consisting of Co, Ni, V, Nb, and combinations thereof (e.g. Li1.000Fe0.460Mn0.500Co0.040PO4 [0061]), (Abstract, [0053], [0061], [0062], [0064], [0067], and [0077]) and from 1 to 10% by weight of lithium oxide of transition metals relative to the total weight of all the electrochemically active materials of the composition, said lithium oxide having the following formula: Li1±δNipCoqAl(1-p-q)O2, where 0<δ<0.1, p≥0.3, and q≤0.5 ([0062], [0064], [0077], [0144], [0145], and [0147]). Yoon et al. does not teach said current collector having undergone chemical pickling of at least one the faces thereof. However, Hampel et al. teaches a 15 to 25 μm thick current collector that has undergone chemical pickling of at least one of the faces thereof (Abstract and [0012]). The pickling rate is set in such a way that the removed thickness is less than 1 μm, in particular less than 0.5 μm or preferably 0.01 to 0.1 μm [0010]. Therefore, Hampel et al. teaches a hallowing rate that overlaps with the claimed range of less than 10%. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have Yoon et al.’s current collector undergo chemical pickling with a hallowing rate of less than 10% in order to degrease the current collector and produce a current collector with much better electrical and mechanical properties ([0011] and [0018]). With regards to Claim 5, Yoon et al. teaches the current collector is a strip made of aluminum or aluminum alloy [0156]. With regards to Claim 6, Yoon et al. teaches the current collector is coated on both faces with said composition of electrochemically active materials [0156]. With regards to Claim 9, Yoon et al. teaches a method of depositing the active material composition on a current collector by preparing a paste comprising the active material composition. The amount of active material is typically loaded at about 10-20 mg/cm2 [0157]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to have selected the overlapping portion of the ranges disclosed by the reference because overlapping ranges have been held to be a prima facie case of obviousness, In re Malagari, 182 USPQ 549. With regards to Claims 11 and 13, Yoon et al. teaches the current collector is solid, and therefore should not have a through hole [0156]. With regards to Claims 14 and 15, Yoon et al. teaches a lithium-ion type electrochemical cell comprising the at least one electrode ([0005] and [0007]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LISA CHAU whose telephone number is (571)270-5496. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11 AM-730 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at (571) 272-1291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LC/ Lisa Chau Art Unit 1785 /Holly Rickman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 12, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 31, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12555601
MAGNETIC RECORDING DISK WITH HIGH INTERNAL STRESS TO REDUCE DISK DEFLECTIONS FROM SHOCK FORCES AND METHODS FOR USE WITH THE DISK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12475923
MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM, MAGNETIC STORAGE APPARATUS, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Patent 12421400
MAGNETIC FLOOR SURFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 23, 2025
Patent 12394436
MAGNETIC RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 19, 2025
Patent 12313843
LIGHT SCANNING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
39%
With Interview (+14.4%)
4y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 500 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month