Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/034,358

AEROSOL GENERATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Apr 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 27, 2020 — CN 202011160206.2 +1 more
Examiner
LEE JR, WOODY A
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Shenzhen First Union Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
559 granted / 659 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
64.8%
+24.8% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 659 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Note Claim 1 states that the control circuit is “configured to determine whether the liquid stored in the liquid storage unit has decreased to a threshold after a corresponding preset time point when a resistance change rate of the heating element decreases to a first resistance change rate during a period when the heating element starts for heating.” This wording is much less clear – seemingly implying that the preset time point is related to the resistance change – than the similar recitation found in claim 13 “and further configured to determine whether the liquid stored in the liquid storage unit has decreased to the threshold by comparing the resistance change rate of the heating element with a preset resistance change rate during a heating period after the preset time point.” The Examiner, suggests, but does not compel applicant to adopt similar language into claim 1 as the specification makes clear that the preset time is merely a delay time before the control algorithm is started. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species 1 in the reply filed on 04/06/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim uses the terms “preferably” 600/800/1000ms which raises indefiniteness as to whether the claim delay times are required or not and which time is being claimed. In addition since the preset time point is a lower boundary these limitations are also broad ranges (i.e. >600ms) followed by two narrower limitations which is also indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2018/0020735 to Bilat. Bilat teaches: Regarding claims 1, 4 and 13: An aerosol generation apparatus, comprising: a liquid storage unit (115), configured to store a liquid for generating an aerosol (¶ [0181]); a heating element (119), configured to heat the liquid (¶ [0181]) ; a liquid transfer unit (117), configured to transfer the liquid stored in the liquid storage unit to the heating element (Fig. 7)t; a power supply (107), configured to supply power to the heating element (¶ [0181]); and a circuit (109), configured to determine whether the liquid stored in the liquid storage unit has decreased to a threshold by comparing a real-time resistance of the heating element with a preset maximum threshold (¶ [0126] “comparing the initial resistance of the heater or an initial rate of change of resistance of the heater within a range of acceptable values”), during a period when the heating element initially starts for continuous heating to a corresponding preset time point when a resistance change rate of the heating element decreases to a first resistance change rate (¶ [0126] “predetermined time period after”); or determine whether the liquid stored in the liquids storage unit has decreased to the threshold by comparing a difference between the real-time resistance of the heating element and an initial resistance with a preset difference (“resistance of the heater or rate of change of resistance”); and further configured to determine whether the liquid stored in the liquid storage unit has decreased to the threshold by comparing the resistance change rate of the heating element with a preset resistance change rate during a heating period after the preset time point (“until the heater or aerosol forming substrate is replaced”; detecting if there is no substrate and thus no liquid is considered a threshold for liquid). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 3, 5-11 and 14-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The rejection provided above is based on a broadest reasonable interpretation of “liquid stored” which cannot be maintained with any of the further specified limitations in the dependent claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WOODY A LEE JR whose telephone number is (571)272-1051. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 0800-1630. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edward "Ned" Landrum can be reached at 571-272-5567. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WOODY A LEE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2023
Application Filed
May 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684657
FLEXIBLE HEATING MAT FOR PREFORMING OR CONSOLIDATING COMPOSITE PARTS
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681523
JOYSTICK WITH MULTIFUNCTIONAL SUPPORT ELEMENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678881
Laser-assisted Soldering Apparatus and Solder Deposition Machine
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673388
METHOD FOR OPERATING A MACHINE FOR LASER MACHINING OF TUBES AND PROFILED SECTIONS WITH AN AUTOMATIC SYSTEM FOR THE APPLICATION OF THREADED INSERTS INTEGRATED IN THE MACHINE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668028
DEVICE FOR WELDING PLASTIC TUBES
4y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+13.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 659 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month