Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/034,538

SUBGINGIVAL CLEANING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 28, 2023
Examiner
HURLEY, SHAUN R
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
1285 granted / 1655 resolved
+7.6% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1655 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to because of the following: In regards to Figure 9, it is unclear whether there is one figure or two. It appears as though the figure is labeled as Fig. 9A and Fig. 9B, but there is no brief description of each of Fig. 9A and 9B, only Fig. 9 generally. In regards to Figure 12, two figures are present, which is improper. Applicant should either label the figures as separate and distinct figures, or bracket the elements to present as a single figure. In regards to Figures 13 and 14, it is unclear where one figure begins and the other ends, as they appear to share a box therebetween. Further, it is impossible to discern which lines are AAW, and which are WJ. Still further, the axes have no labels or units, making their content unclear. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 11 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 11 contains multiple periods, which is improper. Applicant is reminded, each claim begins with a capital letter and ends with a period. Periods may not be used elsewhere in the claims except for abbreviations. See MPEP 608.01(m). Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 11 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In regards to Claim 11, the phrase “said fluidic coupling” lacks proper antecedent basis. In regards to Claim 15, the phrase “gas flow” is unclear. It is unclear if this is intended to be the same as “a stream of air pulses”, or a second element separate and distinct from the air pulses. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 12-14 are allowed. Claim 15 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claim 11 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claims 1 and 15 (pending resolution of the 112 issues detailed above) are found to be allowable because the prior art of record neither teaches nor reasonably suggests the recitations found therein, including liquid pulses having a duration of 5-100 ms and intervals therebetween having a duration of 1-50 ms. The closest prior art of record, Baragona et al (20170056142), teaches in paragraph 47 a pulse within the range, but an interval which must be larger than the range as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Specifically, Baragona et al (20170056142) Paragraph 47, Chang et al (EP 2967777) Figures 9 and 10 and Claims, and Kotlarchik et al (EP 2037836) Figure 1 and Claims teach elements similar those as currently claimed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Shaun R Hurley whose telephone number is (571)272-4986. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday, 8:00am - 3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton T Ostrup can be reached at (571) 272-5559. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAUN R HURLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 28, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589047
CATCHER'S KNEE EXOSKELETON
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590391
BRAIDING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582572
MASSAGE ROLLER WITH MOVABLE ARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577730
ANTISTATIC COVER-CORE-ROPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577731
STEEL CORD, PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, AND TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+17.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month