Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 04, 2026
Application No. 18/034,895

COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY SELECTION MANAGEMENT AND MAPPING ALGORITHM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 02, 2020 — provisional 63/108,477 +1 more
Examiner
ARMSTRONG, JONATHAN D
Art Unit
3645
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Black Box Voice Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
56%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
223 granted / 421 resolved
+1.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
479
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 421 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/24/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 10 recites the limitation "said acoustic mapping" in lines 14-15 bridging. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The Examiner understands that the preamble explains that the claim is directed to a method for mapping. Additionally, the limitation of a map of the environment was previously recited. However, no antecedent basis is explicitly provided for acoustic mapping. Dependent claims are rejected for failing to remedy the same issue. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pgs. , filed 2, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground of rejection is made under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) in response to the amended limitations. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN D ARMSTRONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7339. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Isam Alsomiri can be reached on 571-272-6970. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JONATHAN D ARMSTRONG/ Examiner, Art Unit 3645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Dec 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 03, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12566264
ENHANCED RESOLUTION SPLIT APERTURE USING BEAM SEGMENTATION
1y 10m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12535001
DOWNHOLE ACOUSTIC SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING A RATE OF PENETRATION OF A DRILL STRING AND RELATED METHODS
8y 4m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12510644
Ultrasonic Microscope and Carrier for carrying an acoustic Pulse Transducer
7y 7m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12504525
OBJECT DETECTION DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12495789
ULTRASONIC GENERATOR AND METHOD FOR REPELLING MOSQUITO IN VEHICLE USING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
56%
With Interview (+2.8%)
3y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 421 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month