Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/034,937

Energy Absorption Member

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 04, 2020 — EU 20205664.4 +5 more
Examiner
SAHNI, VISHAL R
Art Unit
3616
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
ZEPHYROS, INC.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
738 granted / 978 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1020
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 978 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The Amendment filed 01/22/26 has been entered. Claims 1-2, 4-12, 14-15 and 20-25 are currently pending, with claims 23-25 being newly added and claims 3 and 16-18 being cancelled. Despite the substantive claim amendments, the previous 102 rejection is maintained. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 24 is objected to because of the following informalities: the claim includes the typographical error “the the.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Maurer Claim(s) 1-2, 4-12, 14-15 and 20-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maurer et al. (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2005/0200062) (previously cited). Maurer is directed to an impact absorption structure. See Abstract. Claim 1: Maurer discloses a member to absorb energy [Figs. 3A-5B], particularly impact-energy comprising: a first layer (202); and a second layer (204); wherein the first layer comprises a multitude of three-dimensional elements (206), each being interconnected to a first base (106, ends of 202), and the second layer comprises a multitude of three-dimensional elements and/or openings (208), each being interconnected to a second base (106, ends of 204); wherein for energy-dissipation: the three-dimensional elements of the first layer are inserted into the openings of the second layer [see Figs. 4A-4E]; and/or (ii) the three-dimensional elements of the first layer are inserted into a hollow space provided between two or more of the three-dimensional elements of the second layer and/or vice versa; and wherein the multitude of three-dimensional elements respectively of the first and second layers each have a sidewall and the sidewall of the multitude three-dimensional elements of the first layer has, at least locally, a different shape and/or size than the sidewall of the multitude of three-dimensional elements of the second layer [see, e.g., Fig. 4C (compare 242 and 244)]. See Figs. 3A-5B. Claim 2: Maurer discloses that the three-dimensional elements of one or both of the layers are tapered. See Figs. 4A-4E. Claim 4: Maurer discloses that at least one of the first or second layer comprises a connecting means in a form of an adhesive layer; wherein the first layer and the second layer each comprise a first surface and a second surface in opposing relationship to the first surface; wherein the first surface of the first layer is oriented away from the second layer and the first surface of the second layer is oriented away from the first laver; and wherein the adhesive layer is located on the first surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer. See para. 0023-25; 0031 (substrate layer added using adhesive). Claim 5: Maurer discloses that the thickness of the sidewall of the three-dimensional elements of one or both of the layers is not constant. See para. 0016 (“thicknesses of the base portion, walls, and/or floor may vary along the cross-section of the structure”). Claim 6: Maurer discloses that the three-dimensional elements of one or both of the layers comprise a reinforcement element in a form of one or more ribs and/or a foam layer. See para. 0039, 0054 (“foam”); 0044 (“protrusions”). Claim 7: Maurer discloses that the first and the second layer are provided as one piece. See Fig. 3A. Claim 8: Maurer discloses a system comprising a structure and a member according to claim 1. See para. 0022. Claim 9: Maurer discloses that the structure comprises a cavity in which the member is located. See para. 0022. Claim 10: Maurer discloses that one or both of the layers is attached to the structure via an adhesive layer; wherein the first layer and the second layer each comprise a first surface and a second surface in opposing relationship to the first surface; wherein the first surface of the first layer is oriented away from the second layer and the first surface of the second layer is oriented away from the first laver; and wherein the adhesive layer is located on the first surface of at least one of the first layer or the second layer. See para. 0023-25; 0031 (substrate layer added using adhesive). Claim 11: see claim 1 above. Maurer further discloses that friction between the three-dimensional elements of the first and second layers takes place and the three-dimensional elements and/or the openings of at least one layer are deformed plastically and/or elastically. See para. 0043-46 (friction), 0051 (elastic deformation). Claim 12: Maurer discloses that the three-dimensional elements and/or the openings are expanded and/or compressed and/or tangentially stressed, each reversibly and/or irreversibly. See para. 0051. Claim 14: Maurer discloses that the cross section of the three-dimensional elements and/or the openings of the layers is increased and/or decreased. See para. 0016 (“thicknesses of the base portion, walls, and/or floor may vary along the cross-section of the structure”). Claim 15: Maurer discloses that the three-dimensional elements of the two layers interlock during their plastic deformation. See Figs. 4A-4E; para. 0032. Claim 20: Maurer discloses that the three-dimensional elements of the one or both of the layers are formed as truncated cones. See Figs. 4A-4E. Claim 21: Maurer discloses that the truncated cones of the first layer and the truncated cones of the second layer are oriented in opposing directions. See Figs. 4A-4D. Claim 22: Maurer discloses that the multitude of three-dimensional elements of the first layer are arranged spaced apart from one another. See Fig. 3A-4E. Claim 23: Maurer discloses that the multitude of three-dimensional elements of one or both of the first layer and the second layer include one or more steps and/or the taper is non-constant. See para. 0016 (“thicknesses of the base portion, walls, and/or floor may vary along the cross-section of the structure”). Claim 24: Maurer discloses that the reinforcement element is in the form of one or more ribs, which are connected to a top base of the multitude of three-dimensional elements of one or both of the first layer and the second layer. See para. 0044 (“protrusions”). Claim 25: Maurer discloses that the openings are through-holes. See para. 0022 (holes for screw fastener in base of floor). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/22/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As discussed in a telephonic interview with Applicant’s attorney, Eric Hydorn, the new claim 1 limitation is properly disclosed in Figure 4C. Clearly, sidewalls 242 and 244 have a “different shape and/or size.” For this reason, all pending claims remain rejected as detailed above. In addition, please consider ALL references cited in the current and previous PTO-892 forms before drafting/submitting claim amendments to help advance prosecution. Maurer was previously cited. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL R SAHNI whose telephone number is (571)270-3838. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7am-3pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Siconolfi can be reached at 571-272-7124. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. VISHAL SAHNI Primary Examiner Art Unit 3657 /VISHAL R SAHNI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3616 February 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 17, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 29, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 22, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
May 27, 2026
Final Rejection (signed) — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630135
Brake System for a Motor Vehicle and Trailer Control Module
4y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630131
HYDRAULIC PRESSURE CONTROL UNIT
3y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623723
UNIT MOUNTING IN A VEHICLE
4y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617383
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12600335
TRAILER BRAKING THROUGH TRAILER SUPPLY LINE
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 978 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month