Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/035,065

ENDOSCOPE WITH A SUCTION VALVE HAVING A FIXATION RING

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 05, 2020 — DE 10 2020 129 207.4 +1 more
Examiner
HENDERSON, RYAN N
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Ambu A/S
OA Round
2 (Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
515 granted / 809 resolved
-6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
861
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
60.0%
+20.0% vs TC avg
§102
28.3%
-11.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice of Amendment The Amendment filed has been entered. Claims 1-6, 8-12, 15-19, 21-23 are pending in the application with claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11 amended, claims 7, 13, 14, 20 cancelled, and claims 21-23 newly added. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “wherein said cooperating includes relative sliding engagement along a surface that is oblique relative to a longitudinal direction such that the longitudinal translation of the piston produces the lateral force” in Lines 26-28, wherein it’s not clear the scope of the claim limitation since it’s not clear how the features and function following the claim term “cooperating” corresponds to the piston and protruding portion. The examiner suggests providing more clarity regarding the claim features associated with the sliding and the features associated with the surface, for example “wherein said cooperating includes sliding engagement of the movable piston against a surface of the protruding portion that is oblique relative to a longitudinal direction such that the longitudinal translation of the piston produces the lateral force”. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8-12, 15-18 and 21-23 allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-6 and 19 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN N HENDERSON whose telephone number is (571)270-1430. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-5pm (PST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN N HENDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3795 May 16, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 24, 2026
Response Filed
May 20, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629008
ENDOSCOPE COMPRISING A FLEXIBLE INSERTION TUBE AND A BENDING PORTION
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12599298
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING PHYSICAL CONTACT OF A SURGICAL INSTRUMENT WITH PATIENT TISSUE
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588804
ENDOSCOPE BENDING SECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12543931
ENDOSCOPE CONTROL UNIT WITH BRAKING SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543928
ELEVATOR FOR DIRECTING MEDICAL TOOL
1y 7m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+18.2%)
4y 0m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month