Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/035,102

VOICE GENERATION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 02, 2023
Examiner
TREVINO III, JOSE HERNANDEZ
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Laronix Pty Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
31 granted / 45 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +56% interview lift
Without
With
+56.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
73
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 45 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim 1 is pending and examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the phrase "transducer module" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what structural properties or material characteristics are required to define a “module”. Regarding claim 1, the phrase "speaker module" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what structural properties or material characteristics are required to define a “module”. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the oral cavity" in line 9. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Liu et al (US 2014/0358551 A1). Regarding claim 1, a voice generation system (abstract) comprising: a housing (Fig. 2: tube (2), paragraph 0023) comprising a first opening and a second opening (Fig. 2: first end opening at the tracheostomy (901) and a second end opening at the vent holes (225), paragraph 0024), the housing defining an air passage between the first opening and the second opening (Fig. 2: first space (201), paragraph 0024); a moveable member located within the housing (Figs. 8-9: artificial glottis (20), paragraphs 0024, 0046) and configured to vibrate in response to air flowing in the air passage (Figs. 8-9: the artificial glottis (20) is capable of moving/vibrating in response to the air flow, paragraphs 0005, 0024, and 0046; also see MPEP 2114(II)); a transducer module configured to convert vibrations of the moveable member into an electrical signal (Fig. 8: voice parameter acquiring device (4) is an acoustoelectric transducer, paragraph 00499; also see MPEP 2114(II)); and a speaker module configured to convert the electrical signal into sound and to output sound into the oral cavity of a user (Fig. 10: sound generator (7), paragraphs 0036 and 0063; also see MPEP 2114(II)); wherein, the voice generation system is configured such that during use, the air pressure at or near the second opening corresponds to an air pressure in the oral cavity of the user (though not explicitly disclosed, Liu et al disclose pressure sensors (paragraphs 0027-0029), which are capable of opening or closing valves within the device in response to the users air pressure in order to have a similar output air pressure compared to the input air pressure of the user, paragraph 0040; also see MPEP 2114(II)), Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE H TREVINO III whose telephone number is (703)756-4678. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 9-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerrah Edwards can be reached at (408) 918-7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /J.H.T./Examiner, Art Unit 3774 /JERRAH EDWARDS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 02, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12569591
MXENE-AROMATIC THERMOSETTING COPOLYESTER NANOCOMPOSITE AS AN EXTREMELY WEAR-RESISTANT BIOCOMPATIBLE IMPLANT MATERIAL FOR OSTEOARTHRITIS APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564494
VALVES AND DELIVERY APPARATUSES EQUIPPED WITH OPTIC FIBER SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12544245
STENT DELIVERY HANDLE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12539414
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOOD PUMP CONNECTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12533454
DEVICE FOR WRAPPING OUTER WALL OF BLOOD VESSEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.0%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 45 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month