Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/035,168

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPORTING SIDELINK DRX ON BASIS OF MODE 1 CG RESOURCE IN NR V2X

Final Rejection §112
Filed
May 03, 2023
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, MAHBUBUL BAR
Art Unit
2475
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
245 granted / 293 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
325
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
53.1%
+13.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 293 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The following is a final office action in response to applicant’s reply, filed on 11/19/2025, to the Non-Final Office Action mailed on 09/05/2025. Claims 21, 24, 27, 31-34, 37 and 40 are amended. Claims 21-40 are pending and addressed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 21-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 21 amendment now recites two HARQ process IDs, HARQ process ID for a first period and HARQ process ID for a second period. However, according to the first limitation “receiving, by a first device, from a base station, information related to a configured grant (CG) including information related to a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) process ID for the CG and period information related to the CG;”, the first device only receives a single HARQ process ID. Therefore, claim lacks clarity and is indefinite. Claim 21 amendment expression “HARQ process ID for the first period is the same as the HARQ process ID for a second period” is not understood. It is not clear about the operational relationship between the first period and the second period, and the operational significance of the second period in the claimed invention as the second period and its role in the claim is not clearly defined. Moreover, as the device receives “a HARQ process ID for the CG”, it implies that HARQ process ID is the same during the CG. Claims 34 and 40 are subjected to the same rejections above as they recite the same limitations. Other claims are also subjected to the same rejections above due to their dependency on the above rejected claims 21 and 34. Examiners Note Applicant is requested to clearly claim the invention for facilitating prior art search. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-0232. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 9AM-5PM EST; Friday variable. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached on 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MAHBUBUL BAR CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12587955
Network Slicing Scalability Attributes
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581376
INFORMATION REPORTING METHOD, INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD, TERMINAL AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580696
RESOURCE UNIT COMBINATION INDICATION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581412
DOWNLINK FREQUENCY BANDWIDTH RESTRICTION MANAGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574795
Enhanced Procedures for Transmission of Timing Information in Telecommunication Systems
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 293 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month