Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/035,765

A METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A HIGH-RESOLUTION PATTERN ON A SUBSTRATE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 08, 2023
Priority
Nov 20, 2020 — FI 20206184 +2 more
Examiner
BOWMAN, ANDREW J
Art Unit
1717
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Teknologian Tutkimuskeskus Vtt Oy
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
584 granted / 887 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
970
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
83.1%
+43.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 887 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 5, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Regarding claim 7, the phrase "such as" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). A broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, claim 6 recites the broad recitation “between -20 and 20”, and the claim also recites "between -15 and 15", "between -10 and 10" and "between -5 and 5" all of which are narrower statements of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-4 were allowed. It is not known in the prior art to provide a patterning method for manufacturing of a desired pattern of an electrically conducting, semiconducting or insulating material on a substrate, the method comprising:- providing a semi-dry polymer ink film on top of a polydimethylsiloxane surface of a roller, wherein the polymer ink comprises a polymer dissolved in at least one organic solvent;- producing a patterned polymer ink film having form of a negative of the desired pattern defined by first portions of the semi-dry polymer ink film remaining on top of the polydimethylsiloxane surface of the roller, wherein the patterned polymer ink film is produced by bringing a three-dimensional relief pattern with a positive image of the desired pattern temporarily into contact with the semi-dry polymer ink film so that second portions of the semi-dry polymer ink film are transferred to the three-dimensional relief pattern, and wherein the patterned polymer ink film has vertical sidewalls caused by fracturing of the semi-dry polymer ink film at the edges of the three-dimensional relief pattern, wherein said fracturing is caused by cohesion of the semi-dry polymer ink film and adhesion between the second portions of the semi-dry polymer ink film and the three- dimensional relief pattern;- transferring the patterned polymer ink film from the polydimethylsiloxane surface of the roller onto a substrate to produce a negative of the desired pattern on the substrate, wherein the negative of the desired pattern on the substrate has said vertical sidewalls; depositing a conductive, semi-conductive or insulating material layer onto the face of the substrate with the negative of the desired pattern, using physical vapor deposition or chemical vapor deposition; and- dissolving the negative of the desired pattern using an organic solvent to yield the desired pattern formed by the deposited conductive, semi-conductive or insulating material on the substrate as in claim 1. The most pertinent prior art (Jiang et al., USPGPub 2009/0218311, cited as a “Y” reference in the international search report of the parent application of the current claims” teaches a method of negative pattern transfer using PDMS stamps. However, the method of the prior art is not a roller method and would not be expected to provide the vertical sidewall fracturing claimed herein. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW J BOWMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5342. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Sat 5:00AM-11:00AM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dah-Wei Yuan can be reached at 571-272-1295. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW J BOWMAN/Examiner, Art Unit 1717
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12662736
MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR GRAPHENE FILM
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12637778
Fast Ambient-Temperature Synthesis of OER Catalysts for Water Electrolysis
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637769
FILM FORMING METHOD AND FILM FORMING APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629063
MOLECULAR IMPRINTED BIOFUNCTIONAL DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623007
SURFACE SEALING FOR IMPLANTS
6y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+12.9%)
3y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 887 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month