Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 08, 2026
Application No. 18/036,309

Band-Connector

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 10, 2023
Priority
Nov 12, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2020060225
Examiner
SKURDAL, COREY NELSON
Art Unit
3734
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Google LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
741 granted / 1204 resolved
-8.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1237
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1204 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lui et al. (US 11,666,124). Regarding claim 1, Lui discloses a band 50 comprising: a first portion 60 comprising a plurality of fibers (col 6 lines 22-63 and Figure 7); a second portion 110 extending from an end of the first portion, the second portion having a thick section and a thin section (see Figure 32, right side, showing the band end having thick and thin sections); and a first component 140/144 encompassing the thick section and a portion of the thin section (Figure 31 and 32). Regarding claim 2, the first portion has a non-uniform cross-section – see Figure 6. Regarding claim 3, the first portion and the second portion are a same material – see Figure 2 and sections 60 and 110. Regarding claim 4, the second portion further includes a film 96 having a same material as the first portion (col 19 lines 23-65). Regarding claim 5, the thin section extends from the end of the first portion – see right side of Figure 32. Regarding claim 6, the thick section defines a plurality of holes along a length of the thick section – see pins 146 which extend through the end of the band thereby defining holes along a length of the thick section. Regarding claim 7, a second component 70 further encompasses the first component 140/144. Regarding claim 8, the first component includes a protrusion (see pins 146) extending in a direction substantially perpendicular to a longitudinal axis defined by the band – Figure 21. Regarding claim 9, see pins 146 which extend through the second portion thereby defining a first hole and the first component 140/144 defines a second hole (see Figure 21), the first hole being concentric with the second hole. Regarding claim 10, the second component 70 is configured to be engaged with a lug of a watch case 2 – Figure 1. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 4/9/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that component 70 of Lui is not a second component configured to be engaged with a lug of a watch case. It is first noted that the claim is directed to the band and not to the combination of the band and watch. As such, the lug is only functionally recited in the claim. However, the claims do not define any specific structure of the lug or second component over that disclosed by Lui. To the degree presently recited, channel 14 is considered a lug having an upper horn and a lower horn to which component 70 can be engaged. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COREY NELSON SKURDAL whose telephone number is (571)272-9588. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COREY N SKURDAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 09, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698049
Multi-angle Adjustable Bicycle Side Deck
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12690662
SHOULDER TRANSFER WEIGHT SUPPORT SYSTEM AND FACE SHIELD
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691811
SIDE-RAIL MODULAR, LIGHTWEIGHT LOAD-CARRYING PANELS AND RACKS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12667171
WEARABLE UMBRELLA
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643339
Paint Tray Carrying Device
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month