Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/037,702

MONITORING MEMBRANE PROTEIN TRAFFICKING FOR DRUG DISCOVERY AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 18, 2023
Priority
Nov 19, 2020 — provisional 63/115,827 +1 more
Examiner
LI, RUIXIANG
Art Unit
1674
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
University of Houston System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
612 granted / 1029 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1057
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1029 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Restriction/Election 1. Applicant’s election without traverse of the following species in the reply filed on 06/30/2026 is acknowledged: (i) drug candidates as recited in claim 2; (ii) microbial infections as recited in claim 5; (iii). viral receptors as recited in claim 7; (iv). SEQ ID NO: 3 as recited in claim 15. 2. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 9, 12-22, 24-26, and 28-32 are pending and currently under consideration. Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement filed on 05/18/2023 has been considered by the Examiner and an initialed copy of the form PTO-1449 is attached to this communication. Drawings 4. The drawing filed on 05/18/2023 are accepted by the examiner. Claim Rejections[Symbol font/0xBE]35 USC § 112 (b) 5. The following is a quotation of the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 6. Claims 14 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. (i). Claim 14 recites “wherein the second peptide further comprises a cell membrane insertion domain”. Claim 14 also recites “wherein the cell membrane insertion domain is separated from the second peptide by the flexible amino acid linker: The two limitations are inconsistent, rendering the claim indefinite. It is suggested to amend the limitation “wherein the second peptide further comprises a cell membrane insertion domain” to ““wherein the second peptide is fused (or linked) to a cell membrane insertion domain”. (ii). Claim 32 recites “wherein the method is utilized to characterize the pharmacological properties of the binding agent”. However, the claim does not set forth steps to characterize the pharmacological properties of the binding agent. Claim Rejections[Symbol font/0xBE]35 USC § 102 (a)(1) 7. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 8. Claims 1-3, 5, 7, 12-22, 24-26, 28, and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20170313762 A1 (or US 10,584,159 B2). US 20170313762 A1 teaches a method of determining whether an agent binds and induces the trafficking of a cell surface receptor of interest in a cell to an endosomal compartment, wherein the method comprises binding the agent with the cell surface receptor of interest in the cell, wherein the cell surface receptor of interest, such as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), is indirectly linked to Renilla luciferase protein (Renilla Luc) via a flexible amino acid linker, wherein the Renilla Luc as bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) donor generates BRET signal upon interaction with Renilla GFP as BRET acceptor (Fig. 1B); detecting a presence or an absence of the trafficking of the cell surface receptor of interest to the endosomal compartment, wherein the trafficking is characterized by the presence of the BRET signal, and wherein the absence of the trafficking is characterized by the absence of the BRET signal; and determining whether the agent induces the trafficking of the cell surface receptor of interest in the cell to the endosomal compartment, based on the BRET signal (see abstract; paragraphs [0004], [0160], [0203]-[0204], [0218]; claims 1-3, 8, 25, 42; Figure 1B). The agent refers to any molecules, such as proteins, small organic molecules to be tested for bioactivity, wherein the agent is evaluated whether the agent is useful in the treatment of diseases (see paragraphs [0004], [0235]-[0236], [0249]). The flexible amino acid linker comprises at least 18 amino acid residues (page 16, paragraph [0204]). US 20170313762 A1 further teaches that Renilla GFP is indirectly linked to an endosomal targeting moiety comprising a FYVE domain via a polyglycine linker, wherein the FYVE domain has an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 20, which has 98.6% of homology to SEQ ID NO: 7 of the present invention (see paragraphs [0203], [0273]; claims 8, 25). Thus, the teachings of US 20170313762 A1 meet the limitations of claims 1-3, 5, 7, 12-22, 24-26, 28, and 32. Claim Rejections under 35 USC § 103(a) 9. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. 10. Claims 9 and 29-31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over US 20170313762 A1 as applied to claims 1-3, 5, 7, 12-22, 24-26, 28, and 32 above, and further in view of Laschet et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 294 (11): 4079-4090, 2019). US 20170313762 A1 teaches a method as applied to claims 1-3, 5, 7, 12-22, 24-26, 28, and 32 above. US 20170313762 A1 does not teach the limitations of claims 9 and 29-31. Laschet et al. teach drug screening using SmBiT bound to the GPCR as a cell membrane receptor and LgBiT bound to the G protein as an intracellular protein, wherein the SmBiT and LgBiT as NanoLuc complementation system form a complete NanoLuciferase by the interaction between GPCR and G protein, and induce light emission, wherein amino acid sequences of the SmBiT and LgBiT are identical to the SEQ ID NOs: 1-2 of the present invention (see abstract; page 4080, right column; page 4088, left column; Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made, as an alternative, to detect the luminescent signal using SmBiT and LgBiT taught by Laschet et al. with a reasonable expectation of success. One would have been motivated to do because SmBiT and LgBiT are well-known in the art and routinely practiced in the field by one of skill in the art. It would also have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made, as an alternative, to screen a single binding agent or a plurality of different binding agents against a single type of cell membrane protein or a plurality of different types of cell membrane proteins associated with the cell with a reasonable expectation of success. One would have been motivated to do because such a screening method is well-known in the art and routinely practiced in the field by one of skill in the art. Conclusion 11. No claims are allowed. Advisory Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Ruixiang Li whose telephone number is (571) 272-0875. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Friday from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Vanessa Ford, can be reached on (571) 272-0857. The fax number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, please contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at the toll-free phone number 866-217-9197. /RUIXIANG LI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1674 August 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 18, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12729238
NANODISC-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN-BINDING CHIMERIC PROTEINS
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723068
STABILIZED MHC I
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698334
ANTI-IL-1R3 ANTIBODIES FOR USE IN INFLAMMATORY CONDITIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692478
POPULATIONS OF ENRICHED REGULATORY T CELLS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12679890
ANTI-CLAUDIN 18 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1029 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month