Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/038,232

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONFIGURING MODULAR AIR QUALITY SENSING CAPABILITIES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 23, 2023
Examiner
KOLB, NATHANIEL J
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Signify Holding B V
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
374 granted / 603 resolved
-6.0% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+36.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 603 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Summary Claims 1, 3-5, 9, 11-13, and 16 are pending. Claims 1, 3-5, 9, 11-13, and 16 are rejected herein. This is a Non-Final Rejection after the Request for Continued Examination dated 01 Dec 2025 to enter the amendment and arguments submitted 30 Oct 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 9, 11-13, and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NAKADA et al (US 2023/0123403) in view of JEFFRESS et al. (US 2022/0018691), STEGEMAN et al. (US 2020/0363043), and SANCHEZ MIRALLES et al. (US 2023/0223727). Regarding claim 1: NAKADA discloses: A dynamically configurable (FIG. 1, FIG. 6) air quality detection system (temperature, humidity, pressure, and odor is sensed in para. 29), comprising: an enclosure (17 in FIG. 6) comprising a communication module (11 in FIG. 3) and a removable portion (61-65 in FIG. 6) to receive one or more air quality sensors (para. 29, 125), wherein the enclosure includes at least one of an electrical outlet enclosure (FIG. 6; para. 28) or a switch enclosure (FIG. 1; para. 28); an integrated circuit board configured to be mounted to or within the enclosure (the hardware that holds 11-16; para. 130), the integrated circuit board comprising a connector in communication with the communication module (It is inherent that the hardware is connected together to function with various hardware configurations discussed in para. 130.); a first air quality sensor of the one or more air quality sensors-mounted on the integrated circuit board (temperature, humidity, pressure, and odor is sensed in para. 29); a microcontroller in communication with the first air quality sensor (para. 130). While NAKADA discloses a removable sensor module (61-65 in FIG. 6), each with its own housing (FIG. 6), that covers a socket (attachment portion 171), JEFFRESS explicitly teaches a sensor socket (338 in FIG. 23) that has a removable cover (para. 180) in their wall-mounted or ceiling-mounted sensor device (para. 115-116). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the removable cover/panel of JEFFRESS to cover the socket/attachment portion (171 in FIG. 6 of NAKADA) of NAKADA, to protect the socket from the elements when a sensor is not connected (para. 180 of JEFFRESS). Although NAKADA discusses different hardware configurations in para. 130 such as using a single or multiple integrated circuits. They do not explicitly state that the circuit board has an expansion socket. STEGEMAN however does teach an expansion port for additional sensors (para. 121) on their control system 207 (FIG. 4) that includes memory, processor, etc. STEGEMAN’s invention also has several air quality sensors (para. 36) and has multiple nodes connected to a network (FIG. 4). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the expansion sockets/ports of STEGEMAN in the device of NAKADA to allow for many different configurations that can be customized to the end-users needs (para. 144 of STEGEMAN). Although FIG. 6 seems to show lights on the outside on the casings of 61-65, NAKADA does not explicitly disclose an array of lights to indicate a status of the sensor. SANCHEZ MIRALLES however does explicitly disclose multiple light emitting elements (7 in FIG. 1) on their electrical outlet (abstract) that has a sensor built into it (abstract). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the indicator lights of SANCHEZ MIRALLES on the outside of the invention of NAKADA so that some operational information can be ascertained at a glance. Regarding claim 3: NAKADA discloses: the communication module (11 in FIG. 3) is configured to transmit sensor status information or sensor data to a building management system (through public network 41 to High-Order system 3). Regarding claim 4: NAKADA discloses: the communication module is configured to transmit sensor status information or sensor data to a cloud-computing system (para. 19, 46). Regarding claim 5: NAKADA discloses: a user interface of a mobile device (51 in FIG. 2; para. 18) associated with a user, wherein the user interface is configured to receive sensor status information or sensor data from the cloud-computing system (para. 18). Regarding claim 9: NAKADA discloses: A dynamically configurable (FIG. 1, 6) air quality detection system (temperature, humidity, pressure, and odor is sensed in para. 29), comprising: an enclosure comprising a communication module (11 in FIG. 3) and a removable portion (61-65 in FIG. 6) to receive one or more air quality sensors (para. 29, 125), wherein the enclosure includes at least one of an electrical outlet enclosure (FIG. 6; para. 28) or a switch enclosure (FIG. 1; para. 28); an integrated circuit board configured to be mounted to or within the enclosure, the integrated circuit board comprising a connector in communication with the communication module (It is inherent that the hardware is connected together to function with various hardware configurations discussed in para. 130.); an onboard humidity sensor (para. 29), an onboard temperature sensor (para. 29), mounted on or within the integrated circuit board (para. 29; 130); a microcontroller in communication with the onboard humidity sensor, the onboard temperature sensor (para. 130). While NAKADA discloses a removable sensor module (61-65 in FIG. 6), each with its own housing (FIG. 6), that covers a socket (attachment portion 171), JEFFRESS explicitly teaches a sensor socket (338 in FIG. 23) that has a removable cover (para. 180) in their wall-mounted or ceiling-mounted sensor device (para. 115-116). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the removable cover/panel of JEFFRESS to cover the socket/attachment portion (171 in FIG. 6 of NAKADA), to protect the sockets from the elements when a sensor is not connected (para. 180 of JEFFRESS). Although NAKADA discusses different hardware configurations in para. 130 such as using a single or multiple integrated circuits. They do not explicitly state that the circuit board has an expansion socket. STEGEMAN however does teach an expansion port for additional sensors (para. 121) on their control system 207 (FIG. 4) that includes memory, processor, etc. STEGEMAN’s invention also has several air quality sensors (para. 36) and has multiple nodes connected to a network (FIG. 4). STEGEMAN also teaches a carbon dioxide sensor (para. 36). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the expansion sockets/ports of STEGEMAN in the device of NAKADA to allow for many different configurations that can be customized to the end-users needs (para. 144 of STEGEMAN). Although FIG. 6 seems to show lights on the outside on the casings of 61-65, NAKADA does not explicitly disclose an array of lights to indicate a status of the sensor. Although FIG. 6 seems to show lights on the outside on the casings of 61-65, NAKADA does not explicitly disclose an array of lights to indicate a status of the sensor. SANCHEZ MIRALLES however does explicitly disclose multiple light emitting elements (7 in FIG. 1) on their electrical outlet (abstract) that has a sensor built into it (abstract). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the indicator lights of SANCHEZ MIRALLES on the outside of the invention of NAKADA so that some operational information can be ascertained at a glance. Regarding claim 11: NAKADA discloses: the communication module (11 in FIG. 3) is configured to transmit sensor status information or sensor data to a building management system (through public network 41 to High-Order system 3). Regarding claim 12: NAKADA discloses: the communication module is configured to transmit sensor status information or sensor data to a cloud-computing system (para. 19, 46). Regarding claim 13: NAKADA discloses: a user interface of a mobile device (51 in FIG. 2; para. 18) associated with a user, wherein the user interface is configured to receive sensor status information or sensor data from the cloud-computing system (para. 18). Regarding claim 16: NAKADA discloses: A dynamically configurable (FIG. 1, FIG. 6) air quality detection system (temperature, humidity, pressure, and odor is sensed in para. 29), comprising: an enclosure (17 in FIG. 6) comprising a communication module (11 in FIG. 3) and a removable portion (61-65 in FIG. 6) to receive one or more air quality sensors (para. 29, 125), wherein the enclosure includes at least one of an electrical outlet enclosure (FIG. 6; para. 28) or a switch enclosure (FIG. 1 para. 28); an integrated circuit board configured to be mounted to or within the enclosure (the hardware that holds 11-16; para. 130), the integrated circuit board in communication with the communication module (It is inherent that the hardware is connected together to function with various hardware configurations discussed in para. 130.); a first air quality sensor of the one or more air quality sensors mounted on the integrated circuit board (temperature, humidity, pressure, and odor is sensed in para. 29); a microcontroller in communication with the first air quality sensor and the second air quality sensor (para. 130). While NAKADA discloses a removable sensor module (61-65 in FIG. 6), each with its own housing (FIG. 6), that covers a socket (attachment portion 171), JEFFRESS explicitly teaches a sensor socket (338 in FIG. 23) that has a removable cover (para. 180) in their wall-mounted or ceiling-mounted sensor device (para. 115-116). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the removable cover/panel of JEFFRESS to cover the socket/attachment portion (171 in FIG. 6 of NAKADA), to protect the sockets from the elements when a sensor is not connected (para. 180 of JEFFRESS). Although NAKADA discusses different hardware configurations in para. 130 such as using a single or multiple integrated circuits. They do not explicitly state that the circuit board has an expansion socket. STEGEMAN however does teach an expansion port for additional sensors (para. 121) on their control system 207 (FIG. 4) that includes memory, processor, etc. STEGEMAN’s invention also has several air quality sensors (para. 36) and has multiple nodes connected to a network (FIG. 4). STEGEMAN also teaches a carbon dioxide sensor (para. 36). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the expansion sockets/ports of STEGEMAN in the device of NAKADA to allow for many different configurations that can be customized to the end-users needs (para. 144 of STEGEMAN). Although FIG. 6 seems to show lights on the outside on the casings of 61-65, NAKADA does not explicitly disclose an array of lights to indicate a status of the sensor. Although FIG. 6 seems to show lights on the outside on the casings of 61-65, NAKADA does not explicitly disclose an array of lights to indicate a status of the sensor. SANCHEZ MIRALLES however does explicitly disclose multiple light emitting elements (7 in FIG. 1) on their electrical outlet (abstract) that has a sensor built into it (abstract). One skilled in the art at the time the application was effectively filed would be motivated to use the indicator lights of SANCHEZ MIRALLES on the outside of the invention of NAKADA so that some operational information can be ascertained at a glance. Response to Amendment/Argument The Applicant has argued that the prior art used in the final rejection does not teach “a removable panel” or “the one or more air quality sensors are mounted on a front side of the enclosure along with the array of light emitting elements.” This argument is moot as new grounds of rejection are presented herein as necessitated by amendment. Please note that it appears that “removable portion” in claim 1 was replaced with “removable panel” in order to distinguish over NAKADA. FIG. 6 of NAKADA shows several different sensor modules (61-65) that are removable and replaceable. FIG. 6 shows that each of these modules has its own housing. The front cover of each of those sensor units could be considered a panel, and therefore the entire device (electrical equipment 1) is “an enclosure comprising…a removable panel.” However, in the rejection above, JEFFRESS was relied upon to teach this limitation to show a more explicit teaching of a removable panel/cover with explicit motivation as to why one skilled in the art would use a removable panel. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL J KOLB whose telephone number is (571)270-7601. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JESSICA HAN can be reached at (571) 272-2078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL J KOLB/Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2023
Application Filed
May 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 26, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 27, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 27, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596042
GLASS WAFER AND GLASS ELEMENT FOR PRESSURE SENSORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596110
SYSTEM FOR MEASURING ODOR AND METHOD FOR MEASURING ODOR USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590850
DETECTING FAILURE IN A THERMOCOUPLE ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584825
ASPIRATING PATHOGEN DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12571698
APPARATUS FOR TESTING LIQUEFIED HYDROGEN VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+36.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 603 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month