Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/038,403

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING PROTONIC CERAMIC FUEL CELL, AND PROTONIC CERAMIC FUEL CELL MANUFACTURED THEREBY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 23, 2023
Examiner
ZENG, LINGWEN R
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
398 granted / 522 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
61.6%
+21.6% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.5%
-32.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 522 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) were submitted on 08/02/2023 and 05/23/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3-5 and 12-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR101439176 to Ho et al. With respect to claim 1, Ho et al. teach a method for manufacturing a protonic ceramic fuel cell, the method comprising: a first step of manufacturing a fuel electrode substrate layer (an anode support slurry), an anode functional layer (an anode reaction layer slurry), and an electrolyte slurry; a second step of performing tape-casting of the respective slurries manufactured in the first step and manufacturing an anode support tape, an anode reaction layer tape, and an electrolyte tape; a third step of forming a lamination structure by sequentially laminating the anode support tape, the anode reaction layer tape, and the electrolyte tape manufactured in the second step; a fourth step of co-firing (sintering) the lamination structure formed in the third step through multiple steps of heat treatments at respective temperatures different from each other; a fifth step of forming air electrode (a cathode) at a surface of the lamination structure sintered in the fourth step at which the electrolyte tape is positioned; and a sixth step of co-sintering the lamination structure having the air electrode (the cathode) formed in the fifth step (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). Ho et al. do not specifically teach the two steps of heat treatments. However, it would have been obvious as of the effective filing dated of the claimed invention to make to the multiple steps of the heat treatments could be combined into two main steps, for example, first step is below 1000°C and the second step is above 1000°C. With respect to claim 3, Ho et al. teach the method, wherein the fuel electrode substrate layer (the anode support slurry) contains a complex of a BZCY (a BaCeO3—BaZrO3 solid mixture) and NiO (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). With respect to claim 4, Ho et al. teach the method, wherein the anode functional layer (the anode reaction layer slurry) contains a complex of a BZCY (a BaCeO3—BaZrO3 solid mixture) and NiO (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). With respect to claim 5, Ho et al. teach the method, wherein the electrolyte slurry contains a BZCY (a BaCeO3—BaZrO3 solid mixture) (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). With respect to claim 12, Ho et al. teach the method, further comprising: between the third step and the fourth step, a step of curing the lamination structure manufactured in the third step at room temperature and forming a shape of the lamination structure (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). With respect to claim 13, Ho et al. teach a protonic ceramic fuel cell manufactured in accordance with the method for manufacturing the protonic ceramic fuel cell (Ho et al.: Page 3; Line 1 to Page 5 Lines 13; Claims 1-10). Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR101439176 to Ho et al. in view of KR20190005083A to Lee et al. With respect to claim 2, Ho et al. do not specifically teach the method, wherein the first step is performed using resonant acoustic mixing. However, Hani et al. teach a method of manufacturing slurry for solid oxide fuel cell comprising a step of resonance acoustic mixing a slurry of solid oxide fuel cell (Lee et al.: Abstract). It would have been obvious as of the effective filing dated of the claimed invention to have modified Ho et al. with the teaching above from Lee et al. with the motivation of having a means such the method can lower the surface roughness by uniform mixing and improve the quality of the battery. Claims 6 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR101439176 to Ho et al. in view of US Patent Application Publication 2020/0119367 to IIJIMA et al. With respect to claim 6, Ho et al. teach the method, wherein the third step is performed by sequentially laminating the anode support tape, the anode reaction layer tape, and the electrolyte tape, and pressing the sequentially laminated tapes of the anode support tape, the anode reaction layer tape, and the electrolyte tape. Ho et al. do not specifically teach at a temperature of 100° C. to 140° C. However, IIJIMA et al. teach a method of preparing a membrane electrode assembly comprising a step of inserting an electrolyte membrane between an anode catalyst layer and a cathode catalyst layer, then laminating them at 120° C under a pressure of 100 kg/cm−1 for 10 min (IIJIMA et al.: Section [0152]). It would have been obvious as of the effective filing dated of the claimed invention to have modified Ho et al. with the above teaching from IIJIMA et al. with the motivation of having a means such it is a common process of lamination for a MEA of a fuel cell. With respect to claim 11, Ho et al. do not specifically teach the method, further comprising: between the second step and the third step, a step of cutting each of the anode support tape, the anode reaction layer tape, and the electrolyte tape manufactured in the second step. However, IIJIMA et al. teach a method of preparing a membrane electrode assembly comprising a step of cutting the anode catalyst layer and cathode catalyst layer in a specific size (IIJIMA et al.: Section [0152]). It would have been obvious as of the effective filing dated of the claimed invention to have modified Ho et al. with the above teaching from IIJIMA et al. with the motivation of having a means such the step of cutting the anode support tape, the anode reaction layer tape, and the electrolyte tape is known in the art. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LINGWEN R ZENG whose telephone number is (571)272-6649. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Milton I Cano and Tiffany Legette can be reached on (313) 446-4937 and (571) 270-7078, respectively. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LINGWEN R ZENG/Examiner, Art Unit 1723 1/16/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603351
BATTERY MODULE WITH IMPROVED COOLING PERFORMANCE AND BATTERY PACK INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603397
Seam Welding Structure of Battery Can, Current Collecting Plate, and Cap and Battery Cell Using the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597683
CURRENT COLLECTOR, BATTERY CELL, BATTERY PACK, AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592449
ASSEMBLED BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573676
BATTERY UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+21.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 522 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month