Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/038,932

FIBER-REINFORCED PULTRUSION-MOLDED ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 25, 2023
Examiner
HALL, DEVE V.
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Toray Industries, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
676 granted / 902 resolved
+9.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
941
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 902 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b ) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the appl icant regards as his invention. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claim recites, “at least one epoxy resin selected from the bisphenol type epoxy resins,” t he addition of the word “type” extends the scope of the claims so as to render them indefinite since it is unclear what “type” is intended to convey. The addition of the word “type” to the otherwise definite expression renders the definite expression indefinite by extending its scope. Ex parte Copenhaver, 109 USPQ 118 (Bd. App. 1955). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale , or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim s 15- 22 , 27, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by NGUYEN et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2015/0259580, hereinafter NGUYEN) as evidenced by NGUYEN (U.S. Publication No. 2010/0280151, hereinafter NGUYEN ‘151). Regarding claim s 15 and 16 , NGUYEN teaches a fiber reinforced polymer composition comprising a plurality of reinforcing fiber s (fiber bundle [0017]) and an adhesive composition, wherein the adhesive composition comprises at least a thermosetting resin (Abstract) , a toughener/filler, and a interlayer toughener [0005] . The thermosetting resin include epoxy resins, epoxy novolac resins, ester resins, vinyl ester resins, phenolic resins, polyurethanes, and etc. [0023-0037]. The toughener/filler includes elastomers, branched polymers, hyperbranched polymers, rubbery polymers, oxides or inorganic materials such as clay, carbon black, core-shell particles, and etc. [0056] and the interlayer toughener include thermoplastics, elastomers, or combinations of an elastomer and a thermoplastic, or combinations of an elastomer and an inorganic such as glass, or pluralities of nanofibers or micronfibers [0057]. Examples of core-shell particles comprising an amine branched polymer as a shell grafted to a core polymer polymerized from polymerizable monomers containing unsaturated carbon-to-carbon bonds as evidenced by NGUYEN ‘151. The adhesive composition may be directly applied to reinforcing fibers which include methods such as pultrusion molding [0079 and 0082]. The pultrusion molding is a method in which reinforcing fibers are continuously passed through an impregnating tank filled with a liquid thermosetting resin composition to impregnate them with the thermosetting resin composition [0082] which produces a fiber reinforced polymer composite . The fiber reinforced polymer compositions can be cured by a one-step cure to a final cure temperature, or a multiple-step cure in which the fiber reinforced polymer composition is maintained at a certain temperature for a certain period of time [0075-0078]. Regarding claim 17, NGUYEN teaches the fiber reinforced polymer composition comprising core-shell particles [0056] . Regarding claim s 18 -2 2 , NGUYEN teaches the present invention, see paragraph 6 above. More specifically, NGUYEN teaches t he thermosetting resin include epoxy resins and phenols including bisphenol A epoxy resins, bisphenol F epoxy resins, bisphenol S epoxy resins, and etc. [0023-00 25 ] (which reads on [a1]), curing agent (Abstract; [0005-0007, 0012, 0038-0041]), and curing accelerator [0052] . Examples of bisphenol A epoxy resins include jER 825 and 828 [0025] which are well-known to be liquid at room temperature (25 o C). An example of curing agent include carboxylic acid anhydrides including methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride [0039] (which reads on an acid anhydride having an alicyclic structure and being liquid at room temperature (25 o C). The curing accelerator includes imidazole and phosphorus [0052 and 0054]. The working Examples includes 3.5 parts (Example 8), 3 parts (Example 9), and 4 parts (Example 10) (Table 1). Regarding claim 27, NGUYEN teaches the fiber reinforced polymer composition comprises core-shell rubber in the amount of 5 phr [0044]. Regarding claim 28, NGUYEN teaches the fiber reinforced polymer composition comprises the reinforcing fiber is a carbon fiber [0016-19]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or non - obviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim s 23 , 25, and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over ISHIDA et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2017/0058087, herein ISHIDA) in view of NGUYEN et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2015/0259580, NGUYEN). Regarding claim s 23 , 25, and 26 , ISHIDA teaches a fiber-reinforced resin composi te material which is obtained by pultrusion molding [0067] which includes an epoxy group-containing vinyl ester resin [0003], radical-based thermal polymerization initiator including organic peroxides [0053], and radical polymerizable diluent including a styrene monomer [0055]. The composite has excellent toughness [0003]. However, ISHIDA does not teach a toughness improving agent (component [B]). In the same field of endeavor of a fiber-reinforced resin composition, NGUYEN teaches a toughener/filler which includes elastomers, branched polymers, hyperbranched polymers, rubbery polymers, oxides or inorganic materials such as clay, carbon black, core-shell particles, and etc. [0056] and the interlayer toughener include thermoplastics, elastomers, or combinations of an elastomer and a thermoplastic, or combinations of an elastomer and an inorganic such as glass, or pluralities of nanofibers or micronfibers [0057]. Given ISHIHDA teaches a fiber reinforced resin composite material having a toughness, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill to have provided the toughener of NGUYEN with the composite of ISHIDA for the benefit of obtaining desired toughness for the fiber reinforced resin composite. It is well settled that it is prima facie obvious to combine two ingredients, each of which is targeted by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose. In re Linder 457 F,2d 506,509, 173 USPQ 356, 359 (CCPA 1972). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 24 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. NGUYEN and ISHIDA do not teach a ratio by mass between the vinyl ester resin [b1] and the reactive diluent [b2] of the vinyl ester resin composition is 40:60 to 60:40. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FILLIN "Examiner name" \* MERGEFORMAT DEVE V HALL whose telephone number is FILLIN "Phone number" \* MERGEFORMAT (571)270-7738 . The examiner can normally be reached FILLIN "Work Schedule?" \* MERGEFORMAT M-F, 9 am-5 pm, EST . Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, FILLIN "SPE Name?" \* MERGEFORMAT Joseph Del Sole can be reached at FILLIN "SPE Phone?" \* MERGEFORMAT (571) 272-1130 . The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. FILLIN "Examiner Stamp" \* MERGEFORMAT DEVE V. HALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 1763 /DEVE V HALL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 25, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600670
PRECAST CONCRETE MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595360
ROOFING COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING LINEAR LOW-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593848
TRANSPARENT ANTIVIRAL/ANTIMICROBIAL COATING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595319
RUBBER COMPOSITION AND PNEUMATIC TIRE USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595354
METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF A POLYCARBONATE COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+17.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 902 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month