Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/039,057

Thermoplastic Resin Composition and Molded Article Using Same

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 26, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2020 — RE 10-2020-0165200 +1 more
Examiner
DICUS, TAMRA
Art Unit
1787
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lotte Chemical Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
30%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 30% of cases
30%
Career Allowance Rate
191 granted / 638 resolved
-35.1% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
703
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.1%
+53.1% vs TC avg
§102
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 638 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sim (WO 2019/078464) in view of Weber (US 2007/0161746) taken in view of the evidence given by Sanyo (Pelectron web article). It is noted that when utilizing WO 2019/078464 in the above paragraph, the disclosures of the reference are based on US 2020/0354561 which is an English language equivalent of the reference. Therefore, the column and line numbers cited with respect to WO 2019/078464 are found in US 2020/0354561. Re claims 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, Sim discloses a thermoplastic resin composition comprising 100 parts by weight of a base resin comprising about 60 wt.% to about 90 wt.% rubber-modified aromatic vinyl copolymer (A) and about 10 wt.% to about 40 wt.% polyamide resin (B), about 1 to about 15 parts by weight of poly(ether ester amide) block copolymer, and about 1 to about 20 parts heat resistant vinyl copolymer [11, 25]. The rubber-modified aromatic vinyl copolymer (A) comprises about 20 wt.% to about 50 wt.% rubber-modified aromatic vinyl graft copolymer (A1) that is a core-shell polymer comprising a butadiene rubber core and a styrene-acrylonitrile shell [28-30 and 32-34] and about 50 wt.% to about 80 wt.% aromatic vinyl copolymer (A2) comprising styrene acrylonitrile copolymer [38-42]. It is calculated that there is present 18 to 30 wt.% (0.2*90 – 0.5*60) rubber-modified aromatic vinyl graft copolymer (A1) and 30 to 72 wt% (0.5*30 - 0.8*90) aromatic vinyl copolymer (A2). Although there is no disclosure of the crystallization temperature of the poly(ether ester amide) block copolymer, Sim uses poly(ether ester amide) block copolymer known under the tradename Pelectron AS [96] which as evidenced by Sanyo (see page 11) has a crystallization temperature of 123 C. Sim discloses the use of a maleimide-aromatic vinyl (styrene)-vinyl cyanide (acrylonitrile) copolymer but does not disclose a maleic anhydride-aromatic vinyl (styrene)-vinyl cyanide (acrylonitrile). Weber discloses thermoplastic resin composition comprising polyamide, rubber-based graft copolymer, and rubber-free copolymer (Abstract) which is maleimide-styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer as well as a maleic anhydride-styrene-acrylonitrile [95, 97, 102-107]. In light of the disclosure of the equivalence and interchangeability of using maleimide-styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer with using maleic anhydride-styrene-acrylonitrile disclosed by Weber as set forth above, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use maleic anhydride-styrene-acrylonitrile as the heat resistant vinyl copolymer of Sim and thereby arrive at the claimed invention. Re claim 3, Sim discloses the core-shell polymer has average particle diameter of 0.05 to 6 microns [31]. Re claim 5, Sim discloses that the aromatic vinyl copolymer comprises 20-90 wt% styrene and 10-80 wt.% acrylonitrile [41, 43, 46]. Re claim 6, Sim discloses that the aromatic vinyl copolymer has weight average molecular weight of 10,000-300,000 [47]. Re claim 8, Sim discloses the polyamide includes polyamide 6, polyamide 11, etc. [51]. Re claim 9, Sim discloses the poly(ether ester amide) block copolymer is made by reacting components including aminocarboxylic acid, lactam or diamine-dicarboxylic acid salt having 6 or more carbon atoms and C4-C20 dicarboxylic acid [56]. Re claim 11, Sim discloses the use of additives including flame retardant, antioxidant, etc. [78]. Response to Arguments Applicant acknowledges the teachings of PMI-SAN of Sim but argues there is no motivation to replace the PMI-SAN of Sims with an MAH based copolymer to improve heat resistance and antistatic properties. However, that is the reason the motivation is to improve heat resistance and antistatic properties. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim et al. (US 2023/0133698) discloses thermoplastic resin composition comprising butadiene-based rubber-modified aromatic vinyl cyanide graft copolymer, aromatic vinyl-vinyl cyanide copolymer, polyamide resin and poly(ether ester amide) block copolymer. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The examiner should be directed to TAMRA L. DICUS whose telephone number is (571)272-2022. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 am 4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Callie Shosho can be reached on 571-272-1123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. TAMRA L. DICUS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1787 /TAMRA L. DICUS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1787
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
May 26, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674061
PAINT COMPOSITION
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668705
ORGANIC-INORGANIC ADHESIVE COMPOSITION, AND GAS BARRIER FILM COMPRISING SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643311
FILMS, LAMINATES, AND METHODS OF MAKING COMPOSITIONS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12637787
LAMINATED STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LAMINATED STRUCTURE
4y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636854
MULTILAYER FILM
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
30%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+21.5%)
3y 11m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month