Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/039,806

OCTAHEDRAL RETICULATED STEREO MODULE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 15, 2023
Examiner
GLESSNER, BRIAN E
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Miguel Diaz Brie
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
46%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allow Rate
43 granted / 136 resolved
-20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
178
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
46.3%
+6.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 136 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 1, line 7, It is unclear to the examiner how the upper vertex is (V6) when, according to the drawings, (V6) is the lower vertex. Regarding claims 2-4, the phrase "preferably" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). In claims 2-3, is the ‘strut bar’ and the ‘tension bar’ claimed the same as the vertical bar claimed in claim 1 or different bars? This is quite confusing to the examiner and the examiner will treat the strut bar and tension bar as being the same and having the same structure as a vertical bar. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by ‘790 (CN1258790). For claim 1, ‘790 discloses a reticulated stereo module for the construction of buildings of the type that uses elements of reticulated stereo octahedral type and quadrangular panels for the construction of walls, floors and ceilings, characterized because it includes: 4 diagonal bars placed between its medium vertexes and its upper vertex; 4 diagonal bars placed between its medium vertexes and its upper vertex; 4 horizontal bars placed between each one of its 4 medium vertexes, and its central node; and 1 vertical bar placed between its lower vertex and its central node and/or 1 vertical bar placed between its upper vertex and its central node (fig. 4). For claim 2, ‘790 discloses that the module preferably includes only 1 strut bar placed between its lower vertex and its central node (no other bars are provided extending from the lower vertex to the central node). For claim 3, ‘790 discloses that the module preferably includes only 1 tension bar placed between its upper vertex and its central node (no other bars are provided extending from the upper vertex to the central node). For claim 4, ‘790 discloses that the module preferably includes 1 bar placed between its upper vertex and its central node and 1 bar placed between its lower vertex and its central node (fig. 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA K IHEZIE whose telephone number is (571)270-5347. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at 571-272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSHUA K IHEZIE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601169
MID-WALL VENT AND SYSTEMS INCORPORATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12569076
FOLDABLE STRUCTURE FOR CHILD PLAY AREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571174
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR USE IN REPAIRING CABLE HIGHWAY GUARDRAILS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12522475
Construction Elevator Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12496495
CLIMBING STICKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
46%
With Interview (+14.1%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 136 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month