Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/039,822

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF MAKING UV CURABLE SECURITY INKJET INKS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 01, 2023
Examiner
NASSIRI MOTLAGH, ANITA
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Troy Group Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allow Rate
335 granted / 614 resolved
-10.4% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
643
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
11.9%
-28.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 614 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-9 in the reply filed on 03/16/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 10-24 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 03/16/2026. Claims 1-24 are pending. Claims 1-9 are being examined. Claims 10-24 are withdrawn from further examination as being directed to non-elected inventions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Iftime et al. (US 8222313 B2). Considering claim 1, Iftime teaches a UV curable ink composition suitable for use in security printing (Iftime, abstract and Col. 8 lines 4-8). Iftime teaches the composition comprises at least one fluorescent organic nanoparticle wherein one or more fluorescent dyes are dispersed inside the resin matrix (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 280-35). Iftime teaches various fluorescent dyes may be used including dyes that are invisible to the naked eye such as those that are invisible under ambient light but emit bright colors under black light, for example, those emitting green, yellow, red and orange light (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 57-63). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include a covert UV fluorescent dye in the UV curable security inkjet ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so because such a fluorescent dye is suitable for use in a UV curable security inkjet ink compositions. Iftime teaches the composition comprises one or more monomers and one or more oligomers (Iftime, Col. 30 lines 9-12 and Col. 31 lines 37-45). Iftime teaches the monomers/oligomers are acrylate monomers/oligomers by teaching suitable curable monomers/oligomers are acrylated esters, acrylated polyesters, acrylated ethers, acrylated polyethers, acrylated epoxies, urethane acrylates (Iftime, Col. 30 lines 34-40). Iftime teaches the composition comprises a photoinitiator (Iftime, Col. 34 lines 35-37). Iftime teaches the viscosity of the ink composition is from about 5 mPa-s to about 20 mPa-s (i.e., 5-20cps) (Iftime, paragraph bridging Col. 35 and 36). Considering claim 2, Iftime teaches the covert fluorescent dye may fluoresce in any one of a multiple of colors when exposed to ultraviolet radiation by teaching dyes that are invisible to the naked eye such as those that are invisible under ambient light but emit bright colors under black light, for example, those emitting green, yellow, red and orange light (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 57-63). Considering claim 3, Iftime teaches the one or more fluorescent dyes comprise from about 0.01 to about 50 weight percent to total weight of the nanoparticle (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 41-47); the colorant/fluorescent nanoparticle compositions may be present in the ink composition in any desired or effective amount to obtain desired color or hue such as 0.1 to 10 percent by weight (Iftime, Col. 29 lines 5-15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to vary the amount of the covert fluorescent dye including to within the claimed range of 0.1%-5% by weight of the ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so in order to achieve desired color or hue with a reasonable expectation of success. Considering claims 4-5, Iftime teaches suitable mixtures of at least two polymers may be used to generate nanoscale-sized pigments dispersions (Iftime, Col. 25 lines 65-67); the composition may also contain colorant including pigment and dye and mixtures (Iftime, Col. 26 lines 59-67). Iftime teaches the colorant/fluorescent nanoparticle compositions may be present in the ink composition in any desired or effective amount to obtain desired color or hue such as 0.1 to 10 percent by weight (Iftime, Col. 29 lines 5-15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the composition to include a colored organic pigment dispersion in an amount such as the claimed 1-10% dry weight of the ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so in order to achieve desired color or hue with a reasonable expectation of success. Considering claim 6, Iftime teaches a UV curable ink composition suitable for use in security printing (Iftime, abstract and Col. 8 lines 4-8). Iftime teaches the composition comprise at least one fluorescent organic nanoparticle wherein one or more fluorescent dyes are dispersed inside the resin matrix (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 280-35). Iftime teaches various fluorescent dyes may be used including dyes that are invisible to the naked eye such as those that are invisible under ambient light but emit bright colors under black light, for example, those emitting green, yellow, red and orange light (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 57-63). Iftime teaches it is generally more desirable to utilize fluorescent pigments in radiation-curable dispersions and inks due to their much improved photo-stability over dyes during the curing process (Iftime, Col. 26 lines 26-35). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include a covert UV fluorescent pigment dispersion in the UV curable security inkjet ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so because such a fluorescent pigment is suitable for use in a UV curable security inkjet ink composition and has improved photo-stability over dyes during the curing process. Iftime teaches the composition comprises one or more monomers and one or more oligomers (Iftime, Col. 30 lines 9-12 and Col. 31 lines 37-45). Iftime teaches the monomers/oligomers are acrylate monomers/oligomers by teaching suitable curable monomers/oligomers are acrylated esters, acrylated polyesters, acrylated ethers, acrylated polyethers, acrylated epoxies, urethane acrylates (Iftime, Col. 30 lines 34-40). Iftime teaches the composition comprises a photoinitiator (Iftime, Col. 34 lines 35-37). Considering claim 7, Iftime teaches the one or more fluorescent dyes/pigments comprise from about 0.01 to about 50 weight percent to total weight of the nanoparticle (Iftime, Col. 15 lines 41-47); the colorant/fluorescent nanoparticle compositions may be present in the ink composition in any desired or effective amount to obtain desired color or hue such as 0.1 to 10 percent by weight (Iftime, Col. 29 lines 5-15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to vary the amount of the covert fluorescent pigment dispersion including to within the claimed range of 0.1%-5% by weight of the ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so in order to achieve desired color or hue with a reasonable expectation of success. Considering claims 8-9, Iftime teaches the viscosity of the ink composition is from about 5 mPa-s to about 20 mPa-s (i.e., 5-20cps) (Iftime, paragraph bridging Col. 35 and 36). Iftime teaches suitable mixtures of at least two polymers may be used to generate nanoscale-sized pigments dispersions (Iftime, Col. 25 lines 65-67); the composition may also contain colorant including pigment and dye and mixtures (Iftime, Col. 26 lines 59-67). Iftime teaches the colorant/fluorescent nanoparticle compositions may be present in the ink composition in any desired or effective amount to obtain desired color or hue such as 0.1 to 10 percent by weight (Iftime, Col. 29 lines 5-15). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the composition to include a colored organic pigment dispersion in an amount such as the claimed 1-10% dry weight of the ink composition. One of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, would have been motivated to do so in order to achieve desired color or hue with a reasonable expectation of success. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANITA NASSIRI-MOTLAGH whose telephone number is (571)270-7588. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANITA NASSIRI-MOTLAGH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 01, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595271
AROMATIC COMPOUNDS FOR ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595387
INK COMPOSITION FOR LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE MANUFACTURED BY USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590218
AQUEOUS FLUORESCENT INK, INK CARTRIDGE AND INK JET RECORDING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588419
PIEZOELECTRIC SINGLE CRYSTAL INCLUDING INTERNAL ELECTRIC FIELD, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND PIEZOELECTRIC AND DIELECTRIC APPLICATION COMPONENTS USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577458
LUMINESCENT NANOPARTICLES AND METHOD FOR PREPARING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+25.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 614 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month