Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/040,407

LASER DIODE DEVICE AND PRODUCTION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103§Other
Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2020 — DE 10 2020 215 033.8 +1 more
Examiner
ZHANG, YUANDA
Art Unit
2828
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
842 granted / 1001 resolved
+16.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1001 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 2, FIG. 2 in Group 1, Claims 17-32 in the reply filed on 05/05/26 is acknowledged. The Examiner has found the Applicant’s arguments for Group 2 persuasive and restriction for Group 2 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Takeda et al. (US PG Pub 2014/0226689 A1, 02/02/23 IDS). Regarding claim 17, Takeda discloses a laser diode device (FIG. 1B), comprising: at least one laser diode (52, FIG. 1B, [0020]), the laser diode being an edge emitter (FIG. 1B); and a housing (FIG. 1B) having a transparent optical window (40, FIG. 1B, where 40 is made of borosilicate glass, [0020] and [0026]), the transparent optical window being configured as a first side wall of the housing (FIG. 1B), and the housing being configured to shield hermetically ([0029]), the laser diode from an external environment of the laser diode device (FIG. 1B), the transparent optical window being configured to transmit at least one laser beam (53, FIG. 1B) generated by the laser diode into the external environment (FIG. 1B), the laser diode being at least indirectly fastened to a base of the housing (52 is indirectly fastened to 26 via 50, FIG. 1B, [0020]-[0021]), wherein side walls of the housing (40, FIG. 1B) and a housing cover (comprising 30/60, FIG. 1B) situated opposite the housing base are developed from at least three wafers (40/30/60, FIG. 1B). PNG media_image1.png 276 570 media_image1.png Greyscale (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 17, 19-22, and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a2 as being anticipated by MIYATA et al. (US PG Pub 2021/0091532 A1). Regarding claim 17, MIYATA discloses a laser diode device (100, FIG. 19, [0090]), comprising: at least one laser diode (10, FIG. 19), the laser diode being an edge emitter (FIG. 19); and a housing (FIG. 19) having a transparent optical window (40A, FIG. 19, where 40 is made of glass, [0058]), the transparent optical window being configured as a first side wall of the housing (FIG. 19), and the housing being configured to shield hermetically (“the laser diode 10 may be sealed airtight,” [0053]), the laser diode from an external environment of the laser diode device (FIG. 19), the transparent optical window being configured to transmit at least one laser beam (14, FIG. 19) generated by the laser diode into the external environment (FIG. 19), the laser diode being at least indirectly fastened to a base of the housing (10 is indirectly fastened to 30 via 20, FIG. 19, [0049]), wherein side walls of the housing (40A/40B, FIG. 19, [0058]) and a housing cover (40B, FIG. 19, [0058]) situated opposite the housing base are developed from at least three wafers (40A/40B/40C, FIG. 19). PNG media_image2.png 318 456 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 19, MIYATA discloses the side walls have a rectangular cross-section (FIG. 19). Regarding claim 20, MIYATA discloses the housing has a cuboidal configuration (FIG. 19). Regarding claim 21, MIYATA discloses the laser diode device has a fastening element (20, FIG. 19, [0049]), which is situated separately from the housing, the fastening element being configured to fix the laser diode in position inside the housing in such a way that the at least one laser beam generated by the laser diode is transmitted directly into the external environment (FIG. 19). Regarding claim 22, MIYATA discloses the housing base is a carrier substrate (30, FIG. 19, [0041] and [0050]). Regarding claim 24, MIYATA discloses the housing cover has at least one second recess (see annotated FIG. 19 above, [0098]-[0099]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 18 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MIYATA et al. Regarding claim 18, MIYATA has disclosed the side walls of the housing and the housing cover outlined in the rejection to claim 17 above and further discloses the first side wall of the housing is produced from a glass wafer (40A is made of glass, [0058]), and a third side wall of the housing (40Tu, FIG. 18), a fourth side wall of the housing (40Su, FIG. 18), and the housing cover (40T, FIG. 18) are produced from a second silicon wafer (“the second glass portion 40B may be made of an alkaline glass, or made of a non-alkaline glass or a semiconductor (monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, carbon nitride, etc.),” [0061]) except a second side wall of the housing situated opposite the first side wall is produced from a first silicon wafer. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claim invention to modify the second side wall of the housing with a silicon wafer in order to minimize unwanted emission through the second side wall of the housing, since it has been held to be within the general skill of a worker in the art to select a known material on the basis of its suitability for the intended use as a matter of obvious design choice. In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416. Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MIYATA et al. in view of HUANG et al. (US PG Pub 2010/0148210 A1). Regarding claim 23, MIYATA has disclosed the carrier substrate outlined in the rejection to claim 22 above except the carrier substrate is provided with at least one first circumferential recess on an underside of the carrier substrate. HUANG discloses the carrier substrate (100, FIG. 1A, [0018]) is provided with at least one first circumferential recess (102a’, FIG. 1A, [0019]) on an underside (100b, FIG. 1B, [0018]) of the carrier substrate. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the carrier substrate of MIYATA with the at least one first circumferential recess on an underside of the carrier substrate as taught by HUANG in order to facilitate electrical connections between the upper and lower sides of the carrier substrate. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 25-32 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. MIYATA (US PG Pub 2021/0119409 A1) discloses a laser diode device (100) comprising an edge emitting laser diode (10) mounted inside a hermetically sealed housing (40) and an optical detector (50) for detecting light reflected by an emission surface of the housing (see FIG. 4). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YUANDA ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1439. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:30 AM - 6:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MINSUN HARVEY can be reached at (571)272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YUANDA ZHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2828
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706443
OPTICAL DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695269
LASER DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689183
STACKED GRATINGS FOR OPTICAL EMITTERS
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689174
SURFACE EMITTING LASER AND SURFACE EMITTING LASER ARRAY
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12676456
ROBUST AND INTRINSICALLY SAFE LASER FAILURE DETECTION IN THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+11.8%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1001 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month