Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/041,099

Awakening Inducting Method, Awakening Inducting Program, and Awakening Inducting System

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 09, 2023
Examiner
DIETZ, NOE ROBERT
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 0% of cases
0%
Career Allow Rate
0 granted / 0 resolved
-70.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
28
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 0 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTIONNotice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 5, & 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2016/0310697 hereinafter Franceschetti in view of US 2005/0283039 hereinafter Cornel. In regards to Claim 1: Franceschetti teaches An awakening induction method, comprising: a first step of measuring a core temperature of a user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 0067; Figure 11 Item 1140 & 1150); a third step of determining a recommended wake-up time range of the scheduled date based on the awakening time to present the wake-up time range to the user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 0061; Figure 9 Item 930 & 940); a fourth step of setting a scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date according to an instruction from the user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 0061; Figure 8 Item 810) ; a fifth step of raising an environment temperature around the user when it is a predetermined time before the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date (Franceschetti, Paragraph 74; “ If the current bed temperature is below the historical average, the process sends a control signal to increase the temperature of the bed to match the historical average.”). Franceschetti does not teach, a second step of estimating an awakening time of the user on the day before a scheduled date of awakening induction based on previous measurement of the core temperature, and a sixth step of irradiating the user with light when the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date is reached. Cornel teaches a second step of estimating an awakening time of the user on the day before a scheduled date of awakening induction based on previous measurement of the core temperature (Cornel, Paragraph 0015, Examiner interprets the day before as included in the historical data stated in prior art), and a sixth step of irradiating the user with light when the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date is reached (Cornel, Paragraph 0027). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the estimation of alertness and the light switch control taught by Cornel to the bed device of Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide to evaluate the user and based on previously collected data, predict a time to wake the user up for optimal sleep efficiency. The motivation of adding Cornel to Franceschetti for the purposes of irradiating the user to arouse them is give the user a visual indication of the time to awaken. In regards to Claim 5: A modified Franceschetti teaches of an awakening induction program causing a computer to execute each step as set forth (Franceschetti, Paragraph 0045; Figure 1 Item 100). In regards to Claim 6: Franceschetti teaches An awakening induction system, comprising: an environmental control device configured to control an environment around a user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 67; Figure 11 Item 1100); a core temperature measuring unit configured to measure a core temperature of the user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 0067; Figure 11 Item 1140 & 1150); a recommended wake-up time presentation unit configured to determine a recommended wake-up time range of the scheduled date based on the awakening time to present the wake-up time range to the user (Franceschetti 12 & 87; Figure 19(Display)); a wake-up time setting unit configured to set a scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date according to an instruction from the user (Franceschetti, Paragraph 60; Figure 9 Item 930); a control unit configured to instruct the environmental control device to raise an environment temperature around the user when it is a predetermined time before the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date (Franceschetti, Paragraph 71 & 74; Figure 13 Item 1340). Franceschetti does not teach an awakening time estimation unit configured to estimate an awakening time of the user on the day before a scheduled date of awakening induction based on previous measurement of the core temperature, and a control unit configured to instruct the environmental control device to irradiate the user with light when the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date is reached. Cornel teaches of an awakening time estimation unit configured to estimate an awakening time of the user on the day before a scheduled date of awakening induction based on previous measurement of the core temperature (Cornel, Paragraph 0015; Examiner interprets the day before as included in the historical data stated in prior art), and, and a control unit configured to instruct the environmental control device to irradiate the user with light when the scheduled wake-up time of the scheduled date is reached (Cornel, Paragraph 27, Figure 1 Item 30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the estimation of alertness and the light switch control taught by Cornel to the bed device of Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide to evaluate the user and based on previously collected data, predict a time to wake the user up for optimal sleep efficiency. The motivation of adding Cornel to Franceschetti for the purposes of irradiating the user to arouse them is give the user a visual indication of the time to awaken. Claim(s) 2 & 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of Cornel in further view of US 2016/0361515 hereinafter Jung. In regards to Claim 2: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claim 2 and of the second step, but does not teach of a time when the core temperature rises from the latest lowest temperature by a predetermined temperature upon estimating the awakening time on the day before the scheduled date. Jung teaches of a time when the core temperature rises from the latest lowest temperature by a predetermined temperature upon estimating the awakening time on the day before the scheduled date (Jung, Paragraph 0061). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the environmental temperature control taught in Jung with the bed device taught by a modified Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide a method to wake up the user at the estimated time that simulates a more natural feeling of waking up. In regards to Claim 10: A modified Franceschetti teaches an awakening induction program causing a computer to execute each step as set forth in claim 2 (Franceschetti, Paragraph 47; Figure 1 Item 100). Claim(s) 3 & 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of Cornel in further view of US 4,228,806 hereinafter Lidow. In regards to Claim 3: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claim 1, but does not teach wherein the third step includes a step of setting a predetermined time range around the awakening time as the recommended wake-up time range. Lidow teaches wherein the third step includes a step of setting a predetermined time range around the awakening time as the recommended wake-up time range (Lidow, Column 5 Lines 27 – 36). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add predetermined time range of Lidow to the Bed device of Franceschetti, the motivation being to avoid waking the subject up while in REM sleep but still arouse the subject with a relatively consistent time. In regards to Claim 11: A modified Franceschetti teaches An awakening induction program causing a computer to execute each step as set forth in claim 3 (Franceschetti, Paragraph 47, Figure 1 Item 100). Claim(s) 4 & 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of cornel in further view of US 2016/0136385 hereinafter Scorcioni. In regards to Claim 4: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claim 1, but does not teach wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user. Scorcioni teaches wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user (Scorcione, Paragraph 0087). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the air conditioners that heat the environment taught by Scorcioni to the bed device of a modified Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide a more comprehensive system of arousal to better improve the nature of waking the user up. In regards to Claim 12: A modified Franceschetti teaches an awakening induction program causing a computer to execute each step as set forth in claim 4 (Franceschetti, Paragraph 47, Figure 1 Item 100). Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of Cornel in further view of Jung in furthest view of Lidow . In regards to Claim 7: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claims 1 & 2, But does not teach wherein the third step includes a step of setting a predetermined time range around the awakening time as the recommended wake-up time range. Lidow teaches wherein the third step includes a step of setting a predetermined time range around the awakening time as the recommended wake-up time range (Lidow, Column 5 Lines 27 – 36). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the time range for arousing the user taught by Lidow to the bed device of a modified Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide a method to ensure a consistent time for arousal. Claim(s) 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of Cornel in further view of Jung in furthest view of Scorcioni. In regards to Claim 8: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claims 1 & 2, but does not teach wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user. Scorcioni teaches wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user (Scorcioni, Paragraph 0087). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the control of an air conditioner to increase the heat of an environment taught by Scorcioni to the bed device of a modified Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide a more comprehensive system of arousal to better improve the nature of waking the user up. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Franceschetti in view of Cornel in further view of Lidow in furthest view of Scorcioni. In regards to Claim 9: A modified Franceschetti teaches all of claims 1 & 3, but does not teach wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user. Scorcioni teaches wherein the fifth step includes a step of controlling at least one of an air conditioners provided in a room where the user sleeps and a heater provided in a bedding used by the user to increase an environmental temperature around the user (Scorcioni, Paragraph 0087). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to add the control of an air conditioner to increase the heat of the environment taught in Scorcioni to the bed device of a modified Franceschetti, the motivation being to provide a more comprehensive system of arousal to better improve the nature of waking the user up. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NOE R DIETZ whose telephone number is (571)272-1135. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Valvis can be reached at (571)-272-4233. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /N.R.D./ Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3791 /ALEX M VALVIS/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
Grant Probability
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 0 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month