Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/041,361

POLYMERISATION PROCESSES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 10, 2023
Examiner
FANG, SHANE
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The University of Bath
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
1136 granted / 1491 resolved
+11.2% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
1542
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.9%
+3.9% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1491 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION All the references cited in the International Search Report have been considered. None is anticipatory. The most pertinent of these references have been applied below. Election/Restrictions The applicant has elected Group II (claims 15) without traverse. This restriction is made FINAL. See previous action for the reasons of applying restriction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15 is (are) rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Uryu et al. (J. of Polym. Sci., Vol. 17, 673-678, listed on IDS and ISR) in view of NIshikubo et al. (JP 2005255973). As to claim 15, Uryu (pg.673) discloses a process of producing a xylofuranose (a monosaccharide) based polyether via ring opening polymerization on oxetane groups using a cationic catalyst, such as boron fluoride ethyl ether complex (Ex.5-6): PNG media_image1.png 200 400 media_image1.png Greyscale , wherein the conversion rate is 14% or 49% (Table 1). Uryu is silent on the claimed anionic/binding agent catalyst. Solving the same problem of producing a polyether (claims, examples) via monomers having plural hydroxyl groups (like Uryu’s xylofuranose) and via ring opening polymerization (15-18, 21) of oxetane groups on monomers using a cationic catalyst, such as boron fluoride ethyl ether complex (Ex.5, the same cationic catalyst of Uryu), NIshikubo discloses using anionic catalyst (15-18), such as t-BuOK/crown ether (18-C-6), for ring opening polymerization would increase the conversion 48%-63% (Ex.5, Table 4, boron fluoride/ethyl ether ) to (Ex.2, Table 2, t-BuOK/crown ether (18-C-6)) 83-98%. Crown ether is a binder agent according to instant pgpub [0024], and t-BuOK is an anionic catalyst according to instant examples. Therefore, as to claim 15, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the process disclosed by Uryu and replaced the cationic catalyst of boron fluoride ethyl ether with the anionic catalyst of in view of NIshikubo, because the resultant process would yield improved conversion rate. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANE FANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7378. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Thurs. 8am-6pm. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached on 571.572.1302. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHANE FANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 10, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600818
PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF STERICALLY HINDERED NITROXYL ETHERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595395
KIT-OF-PARTS FOR CURABLE POLYASPARTIC ACID ESTER-BASED COATING COMPOSITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595338
PROCESS FOR PREPARING A HYDROXY GROUP FUNCTIONALIZED THIOETHER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577411
GAS-BARRIER COATING COMPOSITION AND GAS-BARRIER LAMINATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581846
ELECTROLUMINESCENT POLYMER BASED ON PHENANTHROIMIDAZOLE UNITS, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+19.0%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1491 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month