Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/042,182

APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING CLEANLINESS OF ROBOT AND ASSOCIATED ROBOT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Priority
Sep 07, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020113783
Examiner
MACARTHUR, VICTOR L
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
ABB Schweiz AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
712 granted / 1076 resolved
+14.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1112
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.2%
-6.8% vs TC avg
§112
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1076 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 2-9 and 11-20, in the reply filed on 6/3/2026 is acknowledged. Claim 10 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-9 and 11-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The claim 1 recitation “An apparatus for improving cleanliness of a robot, comprising:” is unclear as to whether “comprising” is to modify the apparatus or the robot. If the latter, note that the robot is not recited in structural combination such that it would appear that the remainder of the claims are mere intended use functions rather than structures positively limiting the apparatus. Claim 1 recites “to enclose a plurality of parts” (line 3 of claim 1) as a mere functional intended use for the hoop rather than positively limiting structure. However, the body of the claim later recites “wherein the hoop is shaped such that at least one gap is formed between the hoop and the plurality of parts” which can be interpreted to positively limit the claim to require the parts in combination therewith. However, it is unclear whether the apparatus is to comprise the parts or not. The claim 1 recitation “the plurality of parts can move relatively” is unclear as to what element or elements the parts can move relative to. Claim 7 recites “the other” which lacks proper antecedent basis. The remaining claims depend from the above and are thus similarly unclear/rejected. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9 and 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. (a)(2) as being anticipated by Kahari US20240261927. The prior art structures bolded below are presumed to be inherently capable of meeting the claimed functions/properties italicized below in accordance with MPEP §2112.01(I) and MPEP §2114, which state that where the prior art structure is substantially identical to the claimed structure, the PTO may presume claimed functions/properties to be inherently capable thereto, thus presenting a prima facie case and properly shifting the burden to applicant to obtain/test the prior art and provide evidence to the contrary. Claim 1. An apparatus (see fig.12a, 12b) for improving cleanliness of a robot (see multiple written descriptions of “robot”), comprising: a hoop (250) adapted to be mounted on a joint (200) of the robot to enclose a plurality of parts of the joint, the plurality of parts can move relatively, wherein the hoop is shaped such that at least one gap (DUC1) is formed between the hoop and the plurality of parts (parts of MOTOR1); and a suction port (252) provided on the hoop and adapted to be coupled to a suction device to allow creation of a flow from the at least one gap to the suction port. Claim 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the hoop comprises: a plurality of shells (FIX1, 250, PAD1) coupled to each other to facilitate mounting of the hoop on the joint. Claim 3. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: at least one through hole (through hole in 250 receiving MOTOR1 therethrough) formed on the hoop and adapted for at least one of the plurality of parts to pass through. Claim 4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the plurality of shells are coupled to each other by at least one of a snap connection, fasteners (parts/portions fastening shells together), or an adhesive. Claim 5. The apparatus of claim 4, further comprising: at least one connection plate (right end plate of 250 and/or plate of FIX1 and/or plate of PAD1) arranged adjacent to ends of the plurality of shells to connect the plurality of shells. Claims 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the hoop is arranged to move with one of the plurality of parts (e.g., housing/stator of MOTOR1). Claim 7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the hoop is coaxial (see AX2) with one of the plurality of parts (e.g., rotor/shaft of MOTOR1) and adapted to rotate with the other (e.g., housing/stator of MOTOR1) of the plurality of parts about an axis of the hoop. Claims 8 and 15-19. Further comprising: a positioning rib (three ribs of C3) protruding inward from an inner surface of the hoop and adapted to fit in one of the plurality of parts to facilitate positioning of the hoop on the joint. Claims 9 and 20. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the hoop is of a ring shape (shape of 250). Claims 11-14. Wherein the hoop is arranged to move with one of the plurality of parts (e.g., housing/stator of MOTOR1). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTOR L MACARTHUR whose telephone number is (571)272-7085. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /VICTOR L MACARTHUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 17, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704169
APPARATUS WITH A DUAL-CLUTCH GEARBOX FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12692921
BALL-SCREW DRIVE FOR ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686265
Positive Drive Differential
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686113
BENDING STRUCTURE BODY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12673412
Robot
1y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+13.1%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1076 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month