Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/042,301

ELEVATOR SYSTEM HAVING ELEVATOR OPERATING DEVICES FOR PASSENGERS WITH LIMITED MOBILITY

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 21, 2023
Examiner
CHAN, KAWING
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Inventio AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
559 granted / 765 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
789
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.3%
-36.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 765 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 05/09/2023, 05/02/2025 and 08/14/2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14-15, 17 and 19-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dayasagar et al. (US 2020/0048035 A1) in view of Hiltunen et al. (US 2018/0016116 A1). Regarding claim 14, Dayasagar discloses an elevator system (e.g. Fig. 2A: 201) including an elevator car (e.g. Fig. 2A: 203) controlled by an elevator controller (e.g. Fig. 2A: 215 & [0047]) for movement between floors of a building, the elevator system comprising: an elevator operating device (e.g. Fig. 2A: 250b) communicatively connected to the elevator controller and being arranged on one of the floors (e.g. [0047]: on each floor), the elevator operating device having a first radio device (e.g. Fig. 4: 449 & [0047]: communication module), an audio device (e.g. Fig. 2B & [0047, 0059]: speaker 254) and a touch-sensitive screen (e.g. Fig. 2B & [0047, 0059]: touch screen 252), the touch-sensitive screen adapted for inputting a destination floor desired by a passenger and for outputting travel information (e.g. [0059]: enable user to enter desired destination and receive acknowledgement from elevator controller); an activation device (e.g. Fig. 2A-4: another 250b, 350, user device 231, 331) having an actuation device (e.g. Fig. 2B & [0047, 0059]: touch screen 252; 258; 259) accessible to the passenger and a second radio device (e.g. Fig. 4: 449 & [0047]: communication module) adapted for radio communication with the first radio device (e.g. Figs. 2A-4 & [0049]: devices 231, 331, 250, 350 may communicate with each other when proximate with one another), Dayasagar fails to disclose, but Hiltunen teaches an activation device (e.g. Fig. 1: 34) having a second radio device adapted for radio communication with the first radio device (e.g. Fig. 1 & [0028]: ID device 40 send floor destination request to transmitter device 34 when in close proximity), the activation device being arranged within radio range of the elevator operating device (e.g. [0028]), wherein the second radio device is configured to transmit an activation radio signal when the actuation device is actuated by the passenger (e.g. sending request when in close proximity); and wherein the elevator operating device switches from a normal operating mode to a special operating mode when the activation radio signal is received by the first radio device, generates in the special operating mode an operating instruction for a call input by the passenger (e.g. [0028]: generate special request), and switches into the normal operating mode when the call input is complete (inherently disclosed: the special request is complete when elevator arrived to pickup the user). Thus, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dayasagar with the teachings of Hiltunen to facilitate communication of a special request transmitted from a user device to an operating device of an elevator so as to assist a disabled user to call an elevator. Regarding claim 24, Dayasagar and Hiltunen in combination discloses a method for operating the elevator system according to Claim 14, wherein the elevator operating device communicatively connected to the elevator controller is arranged on the one floor (e.g. Dayasagar: [0047]; Hiltunen: [0026]—provided on each floor), the activation device is arranged on the one floor within radio range of the elevator operating device (e.g. Hiltunen: Fig. 1 & [0028]: ID device 40 send floor destination request to transmitter device 34 when in close proximity), and the elevator operating device is adapted to switch between the normal operating mode and the special operating mode (e.g. Hiltunen: [0028]: generate special request), the method comprising the steps of: receiving via the elevator operating device an activation signal initiated by a passenger at the activation device (e.g. Hiltunen: Fig. 1 & [0028]: ID device 40 send floor destination request to transmitter device 34 when in close proximity, and allocation controll 20 receives the request and send the request to elevator operating device 22); activating the special operating mode of the elevator operating device after reception of the activation signal, wherein the elevator operating device switches from the normal operating mode to the special operating mode (e.g. Hiltunen: [0028]: special transportation request); executing by the elevator operating device a routine for an operating instruction, whereby during a call input at the elevator operating device the elevator operating device assists the passenger who has initiated the activation signal (e.g. Hiltunen: [0028]: special transportation request based on request form device 40); after completion of the call input by the passenger, transmitting by the elevator operating device to the elevator controller a destination call corresponding to the call input (e.g. Hiltunen: [0028]: special transportation request); communicating travel information via the elevator operating device, wherein the travel information indicates an elevator car determined by the elevator controller and allocated to the destination call (e.g. Hiltunen: [0028]: display information on display 24 of DOP 22); and deactivating the special operating mode of the elevator operating device once the communication of the travel information has finished, wherein the elevator operating device then switches from the special operating mode to the normal operating mode (inherently disclosed: the special request is complete when elevator arrived to pickup the user). Regarding claim 15, Dayasagar discloses the elevator operating device confirms the call input to the passenger through the audio device and/or the touch-sensitive screen (e.g. [0059]: acknowledgement). Regarding claim 17, Dayasagar discloses the elevator operating device has a housing and the activation device has a housing (e.g. Figs. 2A-4), the housing of the activation device being arranged adjacent to the housing of the elevator operating device (e.g. Figs. 2A-4 & [0049]: devices 231, 331, 250, 350 may communicate with each other when proximate with one another, i.e. implies devices may be adjacent to each other). Regarding claim 19, Dayasagar discloses the activation device has an identification device that identifies the activation device as intended for use by a passenger with a physical limitation (e.g. Fig. 2B: 258, 259). Regarding claims 20 and 26, Dayasagar discloses the activation device includes an acoustic signal generator that generates an audible position signal (e.g. [0064]: audible announcement). Regarding claim 21, Dayasagar discloses the touch-sensitive screen that displays input fields assigned to destination floors, detects a touch in one of the input fields, and displays travel information determined for a destination call corresponding to the detected touch (e.g. [0059]: accept destination and output acknowledgement on the display). Regarding claims 22 and 25, Dayasagar discloses the second radio device transmits the activation radio signal in accordance with a Bluetooth technology, and wherein the first radio device receives the activation radio signal in accordance with the Bluetooth technology (e.g. [0049]). Regarding claim 23, Dayasagar discloses the elevator controller determines in the special operating mode travel information for the call input (e.g. [0064]: when assistance button 258 or 259 is manipulated) and communicates the determined travel information to the passenger by the elevator operating device (e.g. [0064-0065]: provide assists to enter desired floor destination). Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dayasagar et al. (US 2020/0048035 A1) in view of Hiltunen et al. (US 2018/0016116 A1) as applied to claim 14 above, and further in view of Simcik et al. (US 2017/0129739 A1). Regarding claim 16, Dayasagar fails to disclose, but Simcik teaches the operating instruction is a voice instruction communicated through the audio device (e.g. [0024]: voice command). Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dayasagar with the teachings of Simcik to utilize voice command to call an elevator. The modification would have yielded only predictable results to one skilled in the art since it is merely simple substitutions of one known method of calling an elevator with another. Claim(s) 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dayasagar et al. (US 2020/0048035 A1) in view of Hiltunen et al. (US 2018/0016116 A1) as applied to claim 14 above, and further in view of Eccleston (US 2004/0000453 A1). Regarding claim 18, Dayasagar fails to disclose, but Eccleston teaches the elevator operating device (e.g. Fig. 1: 20) has a housing (e.g. Fig. 1: 10) and the activation device (e.g. Fig. 1: 100) has a housing (e.g. Fig. 1: 10), the housing of the activation device being arranged on the housing of the elevator operating device (e.g. Fig. 1: 10). Thus, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Dayasagar with the teachings of Eccleston to include a second elevator operating device designated for handicapped user on the same housing of the original elevator operating device so as to assist handicapped user to call an elevator. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAWING CHAN whose telephone number is (571)270-3909. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at 571-272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAWING CHAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600597
METHOD OF ESTIMATING AND COMPENSATING INTERFERENCE TORQUE OF LIFTING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589973
METHOD AND ELEVATOR CONTROL ARRANGEMENT FOR CONTROLLING A MAINTENANCE MODE OF AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587124
HIGH POWER BATTERY-POWERED SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583431
Method for Managing Power Consumption of a Railway Vehicle, and Railway Vehicle With Improved Power Consumption Management
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587117
Control Device and Method for Adjusting Speed and Forward/Reverse Rotation of a Wire-Controlled Brushless Motor Power Supply During Positive/Negative Half-Cycle Phase Loss
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+12.1%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 765 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month