Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/042,658

OIL-WELL METAL PIPE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 23, 2023
Examiner
BOCHNA, DAVID
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Vallourec Oil And Gas France
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

80%
Career Allow Rate
1434 granted / 1797 resolved
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
52 pending
1849
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pre-appeal request, filed 4/15/25, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-4 under Goto 2018/0274703 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Goto 2018/0274703 in view of Goto 10,012,332 and further in view of Nunez 8,535,762. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Goto 2018/0274703 in view of Goto 10,012,332 and further in view of Nunez 8,535,762. In regard to claim 1, Goto discloses an oil-well metal pipe, comprising: a pipe main body including a first end portion and a second end portion, wherein: the pipe main body includes: a pin 5 formed at the first end portion, and a box 8 formed at the second end portion; the pin includes: a pin contact surface 10 which at least has an external thread part 4 formed on an outer peripheral surface of the first end portion of the pipe main body; the box includes: a box contact surface 13 which at least has an internal thread part 7 formed on an inner peripheral surface of the second end portion of the pipe main body; a plating layer (see table 3 and paragraph 104) is formed on a first contact surface 10, the first contact surface being one of the pin contact surface and the box contact surface; a solid lubricant layer 21 is formed on the plating layer; and Goto ‘703 discloses applying a solid corrosion protective coating to the box threads and also applying a liquid anti-rust coating on the solid lubricant coating (see paragraph 76), but does not specifically disclose applying a liquid anti-rust coating to the box threads. Goto ‘332 teaches applying either an anti-rust liquid lubricating coating, a solid corrosion protective coating, or a multi-layered coating comprising a combination of the two is common and well known in the art (see col. 9, lines 4-10. The liquid lubricating coating is considered to be an anti-rust liquid lubricating coating because it contains oil, which acts as an anti-rust coating). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply an anti-rust coating to the solid lubricant coating of Goto ‘703, as taught by Goto ‘332 because inasmuch as the references disclose these elements as art recognized equivalents, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to substitute one for the other. In re Fout, 675 F.2d 297, 301, 213 USPQ 532, 536 (CCPA 1982). Goto ‘703 discloses preparing the contact surfaces with a surface roughness of 3 to 5 µm, but does not specifically disclose if the roughness value disclosed is an arithmetic average roughness Ra. Nunez teaches that preparing the metal surface of a threaded joint, in which solid coatings are to be applied, to a surface roughness of 2 to 6 µm average surface roughness (Ra) is common and well known in the art (see col. 5, lines 8-17 of Nunez). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to prepare the surface of Goto’703 to an average surface roughness (Ra) of 3 to 5 µm, as the practice of preparing surfaces with this roughness, in order to receive a solid coating, is common and well known in the art, as taught by Nunez. In regard to claim 2, wherein a chemical treatment coating is further formed on the second contact surface, and the anti-rust coating is formed on the chemical treatment coating (see paragraph 33 and paragraphs 101-103). In regard to claim 3, wherein the second contact surface is subjected to a blasting treatment (see paragraph 99). In regard to claim 4, wherein the plating layer is composed of a Zn-Ni alloy (see table 3). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. NL 8701929 discloses a similar coupling that is common and well known in the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID E. BOCHNA whose telephone number is (571)272-7078. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached on (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID BOCHNA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 06, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 02, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 15, 2025
Notice of Allowance
Apr 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12584570
MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING MULTILAYER TUBULAR MOLDED BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584579
INTERFACE SYSTEM FOR CONNECTING TROLLEYS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584571
SET OF PIPES COMPRISING AN IMPROVED RETAINING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12560273
Insulating Concrete Shell
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560266
CIRCULATING CIRCUIT MEMBER, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR CIRCULATING CIRCUIT MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1797 resolved cases by this examiner