Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/042,699

FLUID SPRAYING DEVICE FOR CLEANING A SURFACE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Feb 23, 2023
Priority
Aug 24, 2020 — FR 2008626 +1 more
Examiner
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Valeo S.A.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
721 granted / 1139 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
1184
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.6%
-10.4% vs TC avg
§112
40.9%
+0.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1139 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The response filed on April 15, 2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed April 24,2024 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “at least one coupling tube and a spray nozzle which are integrated as one piece” in lines 9-10. It is uncertain how two separate elements, i.e., the coupling tube and the spray nozzle, can be integrated and be one piece. The claim fails to recite structure to turn two pieces into one. It is uncertain whether “one piece” requires a seamless contiguous form. Claim 10 recites the limitation “at least one coupling tube and a spray nozzle which are integrated as one piece” in lines 9-10. It is uncertain how two separate elements, i.e., the coupling tube and the spray nozzle, can be integrated and be one piece. The claim fails to recite structure to turn two pieces into one. It is uncertain whether “one piece” requires a seamless contiguous form. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 Claim(s) 1-3, 7, 9 (as best understood) is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Maruyama (2004/0188541). Regarding claims 1-3 and 7, Maruyama discloses a fluid spraying device for cleaning a surface of a motor vehicle, the spraying device comprising a solenoid valve 18, 20, 22, 28 controlling a flow of a fluid passing thru the solenoid valve to a spraying member 10, the solenoid valve includes a hydraulic portion 20, 22, 28 and an electromagnetic portion 18, the hydraulic portion includes at least one fluid distribution member 20, 22, 28 which has at least one fluid inlet endpiece 20, a circulation chamber 116, 124, 128, and a fluid outlet endpiece 28 in fluidic communication with the spraying member, the electromagnetic portion includes a piston controlling the flow of the fluid passing through the circulation chamber by blocking the fluid from flowing from the circulation ;chamber to the fluid outlet endpiece, wherein the spraying member includes at least one coupling tube 32, 58 and a spray nozzle 66 which are integrated as one piece (integrated into one continuous piece), the coupling tube being directly fixed to the fluid outlet endpiece; wherein the spraying member is fixed directly to the fluid outlet endpiece by reversible fixing means (barb at the upstream end of lower body 32 and the downstream end of hose 28); wherein the reversible fixing means are borne respectively by the fluid outlet endpiece and by the coupling tube of the spraying member, at least one from among the fluid outlet endpiece and the coupling tube being able to take different positions by elastically deforming; further comprising a poka-yoke device (barb at the upstream end of lower body 32). Regarding claim 1 and 9, Maruyama discloses a fluid spraying device for cleaning a surface of a motor vehicle, the spraying device comprising a solenoid valve 18, 20, 22, 28, 32 controlling a flow of a fluid passing thru the solenoid valve to a spraying member 66, the solenoid valve includes a hydraulic portion 20, 22, 28, 32 and an electromagnetic portion 18, the hydraulic portion includes at least one fluid distribution member 20, 22, 28, 32 which has at least one fluid inlet endpiece 20, a circulation chamber 116, 124, 128, and a fluid outlet endpiece 32, 96 in fluidic communication with the spraying member, the electromagnetic portion includes a piston controlling the flow of the fluid passing through the circulation chamber by blocking the fluid from flowing from the circulation chamber to the fluid outlet endpiece, wherein the spraying member includes at least one coupling tube 58 and a spray nozzle 66 which are integrated as one piece (integrated into one continuous piece), the coupling tube being directly fixed to the fluid outlet endpiece; wherein the spraying member has a conveying duct 74, which extends within the spraying member continuously from the coupling tube to the spray nozzle, and in which is inserted the fluid outlet end piece 32, 96, the conveying duct having a shoulder (shoulder of hole 64) arranged between two segments of the conveying duct that have different passage cross sections, the shoulder forming an end stop for an insertion of the fluid outlet endpiece in the spraying member (shoulder forms a stop for spring 88). In figure 5, Maruyama shows a pump 18 in the shape of a piston pump. Even if pump 18 is not explicitly shown as a piston pump, a piston pump is well known in the art. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have utilized a piston pump in the device of Maruyama to reduce cost by using known parts. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Han et al. (2014/0217194). Han et al. disclose a system for cleaning a surface of a motor vehicle, comprising a pump 128 conveying a cleaning fluid through a duct (fluid lines, paragraph 0117) to a least one solenoid valve 202, 206 of a spray device, the solenoid valve controlling a flow of a fluid onto the surface via a spraying member 116, with the solenoid valve having a hydraulic portion 202 and an electromagnetic portion 206, the hydraulic portion including at least one fluid distribution member which has at least one fluid inlet endpiece (inlet of fluid line to heating element 202), a circulation chamber (chamber of heating element 202), and a fluid outlet endpiece (fluid line to nozzles 116) in fluidic communication with the spraying member, the electromagnetic portion includes a piston (portion moved by controller sub-system 201) controlling the flow of the fluid through the circulation chamber by blocking the fluid from flowing from the circulation chamber to the fluid outlet endpiece, wherein the spraying member includes at least one coupling tube (inlet tube of nozzle 116) and a spray nozzle (outlet of nozzle 116) which are integrated as one piece (integrated into one continuous piece), the coupling tube being directly fixed to the fluid outlet endpiece. Even if Han et al. do not explicitly disclose that the valve 206 includes a piston, a valve having a piston element is well known. For example, a spool valve has a piston. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have utilized a valve having a piston in the device of Han et al. to reduce cost by using known parts. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed April 15, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the Examiner’s assertions are entirely conclusory. The elements cited in the rejection and their construction are show in the figures of the prior art. Regarding Applicant’s argument to “one-piece construction,” the claim recites that two elements, i.e., the coupling tube and the spray nozzle, are integrated as one piece. Two elements being one piece is a contradiction for an interpretation for a seamless one-piece construction. One-piece construction is inclusive of two elements that are assembled together to form an contiguous construction. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4905. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O Hall can be reached at (571) 270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752 CHRISTOPHER S. KIM Examiner Art Unit 3752 CK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 12 earlier events
Nov 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Mar 31, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 07, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
May 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Jul 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746423
NOZZLE PLUGS FOR A DELUGE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12729524
HANDSHOWER AND DOCKING SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12703558
DISPENSING SYSTEMS
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691316
MONITORING AND EXTINGUISHING DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691459
Hand-Held Paint Sprayer
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+21.5%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1139 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month