Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/042,795

DEVICE FOR ADMINISTERING A LIQUID TO A HUMAN BY MEANS OF INJECTION, COMBINATION OF SUCH A DEVICE AND AN INJECTOR COMPRISING AN INDIVIDUAL DOSE OF A LIQUID AND AN INJECTION NEEDLE, AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING AN INJECTOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Feb 24, 2023
Priority
Sep 02, 2020 — BE 2020/5607 +1 more
Examiner
TRINH, HONG-VAN N
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Stemberg BV
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
165 granted / 265 resolved
-7.7% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+58.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
292
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
75.9%
+35.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 265 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 24-28 and 34-42 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected group, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 6/3/2026. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II in the reply filed on 6/3/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 29-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mazzeo et al. (US 2266231 A). Regarding claim 29, Mazzeo discloses a device (Fig. 1) for administering a liquid to a human by means of injection of the liquid, the device comprising a movement device (31) and a gripping element (38/39/40) for gripping an injector, the injector comprising an individual dose of the liquid and an injection needle (The examiner notes that the injector was never positively claimed, therefore any limitations further defining the injector are considered functional limitations), wherein the movement device is arranged to move the gripping element (Page 2, col 1, line 58-col 2, line 7), wherein the device comprises a positioning unit (7/16/22) for positioning and temporarily fixing a limb to be injected of a human body (Fig. 1), the positioning unit comprising a first clamping member (23) with a first surface (Surface of 23) and a second clamping member (Other one of 23) with a second surface (Surface of other 23), the second surface being movable relative to the first clamping member in a direction at least partially perpendicular to the first surface to thereby clamp the limb between the first clamping member and the second clamping member (Page 2, col 1, lines 15-21). Regarding claim 30, Mazzeo disclose the device of claim 29, wherein the injector is an injector comprising a housing and comprising an operating member to cause the liquid to move out of the injector via the injection needle (The examiner notes that the injector was never positively claimed, therefore any limitations further defining the injector are considered functional limitations), the gripping element being provided with a first component (39/40) for engaging the housing, the gripping element being provided with a second component (38) for operating the operating member, wherein the first component and the second component are slidable relative to each other (Bolt and nut means 39 can slide along the slotted bracket 38), the first component being connected to the movement device via the second component (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 31, Mazzeo discloses the device of claim 29, wherein the second clamping member is an air cushion (23a, Page 2, col 2, lines 22-24). Regarding claim 32, Mazzeo discloses the device of claim 29, wherein the positioning unit comprises a passage (Opening space between each 23) for letting through the injector or a part of the injector (Opening space between each 23 would be perfectly capable of letting through the injector or a part of the injector). Regarding claim 33, Mazzeo discloses the device of claim 29, wherein the limb is an arm with a hand (Fig. 1, Page 1, col 2, lines 29-30), the positioning unit comprising a hand rest for the hand (7). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HONG-VAN N TRINH whose telephone number is (571)272-8039. The examiner can normally be reached Thursday-Thursday 12-8 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chelsea Stinson can be reached at (571) 270-1744. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HONG-VAN N TRINH/Examiner, Art Unit 3783 /James D Ponton/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673196
MEDICAL CONNECTOR CONTAMINATION PREVENTION DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12642946
BALLOON CATHETER AND METHODS OF USE
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636428
SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR FLUID INFUSION INTO A BODY
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640275
INFUSION PUMP SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH MULTIPLE DRUG LIBRARY EDITOR SOURCE CAPABILITY
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12576211
Refill system for medical device using jet delivery principle
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.7%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 265 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month