Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/043,125

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Priority
Aug 28, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020032672
Examiner
ELLIOTT IV, BENJAMIN H
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1065 granted / 1199 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -1% lift
Without
With
+-0.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
1221
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
63.3%
+23.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1199 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION 1. Claims 10, 11, and 13-17 have been examined and are pending. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 2. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/31/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments 3. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 10, 11, and 13-17 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 5. Claims 10, 11, and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. a) Independent claims 10 and 14-16 recite the limitation “wherein the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets”. It is unclear how the double preposition “to between” is being used. For purposes of examination, the limitation is interpreted to correspond to multiple PDCCHs are linked between multiple search space sets. b) Claims 11, 13 and 17, dependent upon a rejected base claim, do not satisfy the deficiencies of the rejected base claim and are therefore also rejected. c) Claim 17 recites “wherein the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets in a same frequency domain”. It is unclear how the double preposition “to between” is being used. For purposes of examination, the limitation is interpreted to correspond to multiple PDCCHs are linked between multiple search space sets. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. 7. Claims 10 and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over United States Patent Application Publication 2023/0171787 A1 to Yang et al. (hereinafter “Yang”), claiming benefit to and fully supported by provisionally-filed application No. 62/933,243, filed November 9, 2019, in view of United States Patent Application Publication 2023/0156738 A1 to Gao et al. (hereinafter “Gao”), in further view of United States Patent Application Publication United States Patent Application Publication 2021/0195559 A1 to Khoshnevisan et al. (hereinafter “Khoshnevisan”). Regarding Claim 10, Yang discloses a terminal (Yang: Figure 16 with [0133] – scheduled entity as a user equipment.) comprising: a receiver (Yang: Figure 16 – 1610, transceiver) that receives multiple Physical Downlink Control Channels (PDCCHs) allocated to different time domains (Yang: [0093-0095] – UE receives a plurality of slots (different time domains) comprising a plurality of different PDCCH candidates.); and a processor (Yang: Figure 16 – 1604, processor) that controls to use either a PDCCH that is earlier in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is earlier in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs (later).) or a PDCCH that is later in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is later in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs that are earlier in time.) with reference to a time for terminal processing on the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – a UE may use a candidate PDCCH-to-PDSCH/PUSCH slot based on “The minimum PDCCH-to-PDSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH) refer[ring] to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PDSCH. The minimum PDCCH-to-PUSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PUSCH) refers to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PUSCH. The scheduling entity needs to make sure that a scheduled PDSCH/PUSCH does not violate the minimum ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH and ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH”. That is, a PDCCH candidate slot is selected based on the processing time of the terminal, wherein the first slot in time (earlier) may be selected for processing before a second slot in time (later), or vice-versa.). Yang does not expressly disclose a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Gao. Gao is similarly concerned with monitoring PDCCH repetitions (Gao: [0022-0024]). Gao discloses a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition (Gao: [0072-0073] – “In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH that starts at a same time or later in time. In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH in one of the first and the second CORESETs having a lowest CORESET index.”. See also [0087-0088].). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Gao to include a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition for the reasons of improving the reliability of PDCCH transmission and reception by efficiently identifying a reference point of a PDCCH (Gao: [0064-0067]). Yang does not expressly disclose wherein the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Khoshnevisan. Khoshnevisan is similarly concerned with physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) repetitions (Khoshnevisan: [0001]). Khoshnevisan further discloses multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets (Khoshnevisan: [0114] – “In some examples, the base station 105 may configure the UE 115 to support one or multiple PDCCH candidates between multiple (e.g., two or more) search space sets.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Khoshnevisan to include linking multiple PDCCHs between multiple search space sets for the reasons of increasing flexibility between control signaling in a wireless communication system (Khoshnevisan: [0005]). Regarding Claim 13, the combination of Yang, Gao, and Khoshnevisan discloses the terminal according to claim 10, wherein Yang further discloses the multiple PDCCHs are allocated into a same slot (Yang: [0099] – “In one example, a scheduling entity may configure eight PDCCH candidates in one search space set. For example, in a search space set occasion (e.g., within a control/PDCCH region of a single slot)…”). Regarding Claim 17, the combination of Yang, Gao, and Khoshnevisan discloses the terminal according to claim 10, wherein Khoshnevisan further discloses the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets in a same frequency domain (Khoshnevisan: [0114] – “In some examples, the base station 105 may configure the UE 115 to support one or multiple PDCCH candidates between multiple (e.g., two or more) search space sets.” Since the multiple PDCCHs may be repeated, these multiple PDCCHs are assumed to be in the same frequency domain. See also [0083-0085].). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Khoshnevisan to include linking multiple PDCCHs between multiple search space sets for the reasons of increasing flexibility between control signaling in a wireless communication system (Khoshnevisan: [0005]). Claim 14, directed to a method embodiment of claim 10, recites similar features as claim 10 and is therefore rejected upon the same grounds as claim 10. Please see above rejection of claim 10. Regarding Claim 15, Yang discloses a base station (Yang: Figure 13 with [0109] – scheduling entity as a base station.) comprising: a transmitter (Yang: Figure 13 – 1310 transceiver) that transmits multiple Physical Downlink Control Channels (PDCCHs) allocated to different time domains (Yang: [0093-0095] – UE receives a plurality of slots (different time domains) from a base station comprising a plurality of different PDCCH candidates.); and a processor (Yang: Figure 13 – 1304 processor) that indicates a terminal to use either a PDCCH that is earlier in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is earlier in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs (later).) or a PDCCH that is later in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is later in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs that are earlier in time.) with reference to a time for terminal processing on the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – a UE may use a candidate PDCCH-to-PDSCH/PUSCH slot based on “The minimum PDCCH-to-PDSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH) refer[ring] to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PDSCH. The minimum PDCCH-to-PUSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PUSCH) refers to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PUSCH. The scheduling entity needs to make sure that a scheduled PDSCH/PUSCH does not violate the minimum ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH and ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH”. That is, a PDCCH candidate slot is selected based on the processing time of the terminal, wherein the first slot in time (earlier) may be selected for processing before a second slot in time (later), or vice-versa.). Yang does not expressly disclose a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Gao. Gao is similarly concerned with monitoring PDCCH repetitions (Gao: [0022-0024]). Gao discloses a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition (Gao: [0072-0073] – “In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH that starts at a same time or later in time. In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH in one of the first and the second CORESETs having a lowest CORESET index.”. See also [0087-0088].). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Gao to include a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition for the reasons of improving the reliability of PDCCH transmission and reception by efficiently identifying a reference point of a PDCCH (Gao: [0064-0067]). Yang does not expressly disclose wherein the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Khoshnevisan. Khoshnevisan is similarly concerned with physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) repetitions (Khoshnevisan: [0001]). Khoshnevisan further discloses multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets (Khoshnevisan: [0114] – “In some examples, the base station 105 may configure the UE 115 to support one or multiple PDCCH candidates between multiple (e.g., two or more) search space sets.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Khoshnevisan to include linking multiple PDCCHs between multiple search space sets for the reasons of increasing flexibility between control signaling in a wireless communication system (Khoshnevisan: [0005]). Regarding Claim 16, Yang discloses a system (Yang: Figure 1) comprising: a terminal (Yang: Figure 16 with [0133] – scheduled entity as a user equipment.); and a base station (Yang: Figure 13 with [0109] – scheduling entity as a base station.), wherein the base station comprises: a transmitter (Yang: Figure 13 – 1310 transceiver) that transmits multiple Physical Downlink Control Channels (PDCCHs) allocated to different time domains (Yang: [0093-0095] – UE receives a plurality of slots (different time domains) from a base station comprising a plurality of different PDCCH candidates.); and a processor (Yang: Figure 13 – 1304 processor) that indicates the terminal to use either a PDCCH that is earlier in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is earlier in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs (later).) or a PDCCH that is later in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is later in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs that are earlier in time.) with reference to a time for terminal processing on the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – a UE may use a candidate PDCCH-to-PDSCH/PUSCH slot based on “The minimum PDCCH-to-PDSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH) refer[ring] to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PDSCH. The minimum PDCCH-to-PUSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PUSCH) refers to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PUSCH. The scheduling entity needs to make sure that a scheduled PDSCH/PUSCH does not violate the minimum ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH and ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH”. That is, a PDCCH candidate slot is selected based on the processing time of the terminal, wherein the first slot in time (earlier) may be selected for processing before a second slot in time (later), or vice-versa.), and the terminal (Yang: Figure 16 with [0133] – scheduled entity as a user equipment.) comprises: a receiver (Yang: Figure 16 – 1610, transceiver) that receives the PDCCHs (Yang: [0093-0095] – UE receives a plurality of slots (different time domains) comprising a plurality of different PDCCH candidates.); and a processor (Yang: Figure 16 – 1604, processor) that controls to use either the PDCCH that is earlier in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is earlier in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs (later).) or the PDCCH that is later in time among the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – corresponds to a PDCCH candidate assigned to a slot and DCI that is later in time than one or more other PDCCH candidates assigned to one or more other slots and DCIs that are earlier in time.) with reference to the time for terminal processing on the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0103-0108] – a UE may use a candidate PDCCH-to-PDSCH/PUSCH slot based on “The minimum PDCCH-to-PDSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH) refer[ring] to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PDSCH. The minimum PDCCH-to-PUSCH delay (ΔPDCCH-to-PUSCH) refers to the minimum time gap between the end of a PDCCH and the beginning of a PUSCH. The scheduling entity needs to make sure that a scheduled PDSCH/PUSCH does not violate the minimum ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH and ΔPDCCH-to-PDSCH”. That is, a PDCCH candidate slot is selected based on the processing time of the terminal, wherein the first slot in time (earlier) may be selected for processing before a second slot in time (later), or vice-versa.). Yang does not expressly disclose a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Gao. Gao is similarly concerned with monitoring PDCCH repetitions (Gao: [0022-0024]). Gao discloses a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition (Gao: [0072-0073] – “In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH that starts at a same time or later in time. In one embodiment, the reference symbol is a first symbol of one of the first repetition of the PDCCH and the second repetition of the PDCCH in one of the first and the second CORESETs having a lowest CORESET index.”. See also [0087-0088].). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Gao to include a reference time for processing multiple PDCCHs includes a time for starting of a PDCCH repetition for the reasons of improving the reliability of PDCCH transmission and reception by efficiently identifying a reference point of a PDCCH (Gao: [0064-0067]). Yang does not expressly disclose wherein the multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Khoshnevisan. Khoshnevisan is similarly concerned with physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) repetitions (Khoshnevisan: [0001]). Khoshnevisan further discloses multiple PDCCHs are linked to between multiple search space sets (Khoshnevisan: [0114] – “In some examples, the base station 105 may configure the UE 115 to support one or multiple PDCCH candidates between multiple (e.g., two or more) search space sets.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the device for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Yang in view of the method for receiving a plurality of PDCCHs of Khoshnevisan to include linking multiple PDCCHs between multiple search space sets for the reasons of increasing flexibility between control signaling in a wireless communication system (Khoshnevisan: [0005]). 8. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Yang, Gao, and Khoshnevisan, and further in view of United States Patent Application Publication 2023/0224898 A1 to Ling et al. (hereinafter “Ling”). Regarding Claim 11, the combination of Yang, Gao, and Khoshnevisan discloses the terminal according to claim 10, wherein Yang further discloses the receiver receives multiple Downlink Control Information (DCI) transmitted respectively on the multiple PDCCHs (Yang: [0099-0101] – corresponds to multiple PDCCHs within a plurality of slots having assigned a plurality of DCIs.), but the combination does not explicitly disclose the processor controls counting of Downlink Assignment Indicators (DAIs) included respectively in the multiple DCI, based on a specific PDCCH among the multiple PDCCHs. However, this feature cannot be considered new or novel in the presence of Ling. Ling is similarly concerned with multiple PDCCH transmission/reception in communication scenarios utilizing multiple Transmit Receive Points (TRPs; Ling: [0005-0007]). Ling discloses controlling counting of Downlink Assignment Indicators (DAIs) included respectively in multiple DCI, based on a specific PDCCH among multiple PDCCHs (Ling: [0009] – “…a processor that generates a common Downlink Assignment Indicator (DAI) value for a set of Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) transmissions, where the set of PDCCH transmissions are used to transmit first Downlink Control Information (DCI) that schedules a common Physical Downlink Shared Channel (PDSCH) transmission, and the common DAI value is generated based on a first reference PDCCH, where the first reference PDCCH is one of the PDCCH transmissions”. See also [0069-0074] describing scenarios for controlling counting of DAI in multiple DCI.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ) to modify the terminal of Yang, Gao, and Khoshnevisan in view of the terminal of Ying (see Figure 2) to control counting of DAI for the reasons of enhancing HARK-ACK codebook feedback (Ling: [0006]). Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN H ELLIOTT IV whose telephone number is (571)270-7163. The examiner can normally be reached M, T, R, F 5:00 AM-5:00 PM, W 5:00 AM-3:00 PM (EDT). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached at (571) 272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BENJAMIN H. ELLIOTT IV Primary Examiner Art Unit 2474 /BENJAMIN H ELLIOTT IV/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2474 February 25, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Apr 05, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jul 31, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 31, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640962
SETTING DEVICE, SETTING METHOD, AND SETTING PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640801
INTERACTION-AWARE MULTIPLE-USER JOINT SPATIAL-TEMPORAL BEAM MANAGEMENT
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12634082
CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION METHOD, BASE STATION AND TERMINAL
2y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633952
Exposure Detection and Reporting For Wireless Communications
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634188
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR MODELING NON-LINEAR MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (-0.6%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1199 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month