Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/043,175

HIERARCHICAL UE POSITIONING

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Feb 27, 2023
Priority
Oct 14, 2020 — GR 20200100621 +1 more
Examiner
ORGAD, EDAN
Art Unit
2414
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
39%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allowance Rate
21 granted / 59 resolved
-22.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
68
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
84.0%
+44.0% vs TC avg
§102
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 59 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29 and 31-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as failing to set forth the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding claims 1, 4, 6, 9, 21, 24, 26, and 29, the phrase “which, if any” renders the scope of the claimed reporting determination indefinite. Although the specification describes selective reporting of positioning related measurements based on measurement accuracy and available payload size, the recited phrase does not clearly delineate the rule by which the user equipment selects measurements for reporting. In particular, it is unclear whether the user equipment must report one or more measurements, may report no measurements, or must apply some other undefined selection criterion. Accordingly, the claims fail to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter regarded as the invention. Claims 21, 24 and 37 and dependent claims recite “means for” limitations and therefore invoke 35 U.S.C. 112(f). As noted in Non-Final rejection on 11/8/2025, the specification provides corresponding structure for the recited sending, receiving, selecting, measuring, and reporting functions, including the hierarchical reporting unit and hierarchical scheduling unit. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29 and 31-38 would be allowed once 35 USC 112(b) rejection is corrected and accepted. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Independent claims 1, 6, 21, and 26 are considered allowable because the cited references fail to teach or suggest the claimed combination of hierarchical beam selection and, most importantly, the UE-side determination of which, if any, of the measured time difference of arrival or angle of departure values to report based on a payload limit of a positioning report. Newly discovered prior art Faxer et al (US 2021/0083743) discloses the payload limitation but only in the context of truncating CSI bits based on container size, it is directed to CSI reporting, not positioning report content. Similarly, Priyanto et al (US 2022/0099785) discloses beam related positioning measurements and selection based on measurement quality, but does not teach the claimed payload-limit-based selection of positioning measurements for reporting. And Zhang et al (US 2019/0123864) teaches configurable reference signals and beamforming/beam selection, but does not teach the claimed UE-side selective reporting of TDOA/AoD based on a positioning report payload limit. Accordingly, the cited references do not disclose the particular determining step that governs which positioning measurements are included in the report. Other pertinent prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2023/0127908- Berggren discloses A network node supports wireless-device positioning by sending positioning requests with different positioning requirements, obtaining a first estimated position from measurements associated with one set of radio nodes, and instructing a subset of a second set of radio nodes to participate in a second measurement with a different positioning requirement. US 2023/0308240- Cha discloses a wireless positioning invention in which a UE receives PRS resources and reports positioning measurements along with reception-beam information, including beam index and QCL or spatial relation data, so the network can improve positioning accuracy and beam utilization. US 2023/0319764- Shreevastav discloses The invention relates to configuring and managing wireless positioning measurements by having an access node signal positioning-related configuration and a measurement request to a wireless device, which then performs the measurements and returns a response including measurement quality information and, in some cases, the measurements themselves. It also covers using that feedback to adjust the positioning configuration, such as changing reference signals, bandwidth parts, resource allocation, spatial relation, or transmission/reception points. US 2024/0063859- Grieco discloses a UE measures downlink reference signals to select a corresponding uplink beam for transmitting uplink data or control information, determines PMIs from a predetermined codebook, and signals beam switching via a MAC control element such as a power headroom report. US 2023/0388959- Hasegawa discloses A WTRU performs positioning by receiving PRS over multiple beam-associated paths, reporting the corresponding Rx/Tx time differences, and transmitting associated SRSs to obtain network correction information. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDAN ORGAD whose telephone number is (571)272-7884. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request at www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s director, Deborah Reynolds can be reached at 571-272-0734. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EDAN ORGAD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2414
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 27, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 22, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jan 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665725
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING HARQ FEEDBACK FOR UNLICENSED SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665720
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING APERIODIC POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659967
ADAPTIVE CONTROL CHANNEL MONITORING METHOD FOR LOW-POWER OPERATION OF TERMINAL, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12647100
STACKED ACOUSTIC WAVE DEVICE ASSEMBLY
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12634992
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING SLICE-BASED SYSTEM ACCESS CONFIGURATION INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
39%
With Interview (+3.6%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 59 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month