Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/043,586

CLEANING BRUSH, SMART CLEANING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CLEANING BRUSH

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 01, 2023
Priority
Sep 01, 2020 — CN 202010904813 +1 more
Examiner
RODGERS, THOMAS RAYMOND
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Beijing Roborock Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
226 granted / 386 resolved
-11.5% vs TC avg
Strong +59% interview lift
Without
With
+59.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
426
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 386 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendments The Examiner acknowledges the amendments. The previous rejections are maintained and are made final. All arguments are addressed herein. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2 and 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tawara (US2014/0325774) in view of Dieudonne (De 102007052982A1) in view of Liu (WO2020199624A1). Regarding claim 1, Tawara discloses a cleaning brush for a smart cleaning device, comprising: a mounting shaft (Item 51); an elastic supporting member (Item 52), provided with a through hole extending in an axial direction and sleeved onto the mounting shaft through the through hole; and a tubular member (Item 53), sleeved onto the elastic supporting member and provided with a blade (Item 60) integrally formed with the tubular member, Tawara fails to explicitly disclose wherein a first adhesive layer is provided between the mounting shaft and the elastic supporting member, and a second adhesive layer is provided between the elastic supporting member and the tubular member, so as to adhere the mounting shaft, the elastic supporting member and the tubular member together. Tawara does disclose that adhesives can be used, but doesn’t go into detail on where and the type. Dieudonne teaches a cleaning brush wherein a first adhesive layer is provided between the mounting shaft and the elastic supporting member, and a second adhesive layer is provided between the elastic supporting member and the tubular member, so as to adhere the mounting shaft, the elastic supporting member and the tubular member together (Items 24 and 30, Paragraphs 43 and 49). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Tawara to use the adhesives as taught by Diedonne. Such a modification would allow the elastic supporting member to deflect against the floor surface while having a firm connection and not allowing any of the layers to slip (Dieudonne Paragraph 5). Tawara further fails to disclose wherein a plurality of dot-like protrusions is arranged on the blade, the tubular member is further provided with a plurality of protrusions protruding radially outward from the outer surface of the tubular member and spaced apart, and the plurality of protrusions are configured as rectangular sheet bodies arranged between adjacent blades in an extending direction of the blades. Liu teaches a cleaning brush wherein the tubular member is further provided with a blade (base of Item 23) a plurality of dot-like protrusions (Item 23) is arranged on the blade, the tubular member is further provided with a plurality of protrusions protruding radially outward from the outer surface of the tubular member and spaced apart, and the plurality of protrusions are configured as rectangular sheet bodies arranged between adjacent blades in an extending direction of the blades (Annotated Figure 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Tawara to include the protrusions as taught by Liu. As discussed by Liu, the protrusions can easily remove lint, hair or the like entangled around the brush (Paragraph 17). Further, the dot like protrusions (bristles) are known in the art for being able to bend to conform to a surface. As discussed by Liu, this can be used to clean the floor as well as clean the interior surface of the housing, which helps prevent debris from building up on the internal surfaces of the housing (Paragraphs 7-17). PNG media_image1.png 406 730 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure 2 Liu Regarding claim 2, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 1, wherein the blade extends in the axial direction and is configured as V-shaped sheet body or spiral sheet body (Tawara Paragraph 68; Liu Figure 2 or 5). Regarding claim 4, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 1, wherein end mounting members are detachably provided at two axial ends of the mounting shaft (Tawara Item 55) Regarding claim 5, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 1, wherein, the elastic supporting member is made of a sponge material or a foam material (Tawara Paragraph 77); and/or the mounting shaft is made of a plastic material (Tawara Paragraph 45), and the tubular member is made of a soft rubber material (Tawara Paragraph 46). Regarding claim 6, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 5, wherein the soft rubber material comprises at least one of elastic materials of rubber, silicone, TPU and TPE (Tawara Paragraph 46). Regarding claim 7, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 1, wherein a size of the blade in a radial direction is gradually increased from an end of the tubular member to a middle part of the tubular member (Tawara Paragraph 68). Regarding claim 8, Tawara discloses a smart cleaning device, comprising a cleaning brush, wherein the cleaning brush comprises: a mounting shaft (Item 51); an elastic supporting member (Item 52), provided with a through hole extending in an axial direction and sleeved onto the mounting shaft through the through hole; and a tubular member (Item 53), sleeved onto the elastic supporting member and provided with a blade (Item 60) integrally formed with the tubular member, Tawara fails to explicitly disclose wherein a first adhesive layer is provided between the mounting shaft and the elastic supporting member, and a second adhesive layer is provided between the elastic supporting member and the tubular member, so as to adhere the mounting shaft, the elastic supporting member and the tubular member together. Tawara does disclose that adhesives can be used, but doesn’t go into detail on where and the type. Dieudonne teaches a wherein a first adhesive layer is provided between the mounting shaft and the elastic supporting member, and a second adhesive layer is provided between the elastic supporting member and the tubular member, so as to adhere the mounting shaft, the elastic supporting member and the tubular member together (Item 24, Paragraph 43). Tawara further fails to disclose wherein a plurality of dot-like protrusions is arranged on the blade, the tubular member is further provided with a plurality of protrusions protruding radially outward from the outer surface of the tubular member and spaced apart, and the plurality of protrusions are configured as rectangular sheet bodies arranged between adjacent blades in an extending direction of the blades. Liu teaches a cleaning brush wherein the tubular member is further provided with a blade (base of Item 23) a plurality of dot-like protrusions (Item 23) is arranged on the blade, the tubular member is further provided with a plurality of protrusions protruding radially outward from the outer surface of the tubular member and spaced apart, and the plurality of protrusions are configured as rectangular sheet bodies arranged between adjacent blades in an extending direction of the blades (Annotated Figure 2). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Tawara to include the protrusions as taught by Liu. As discussed by Liu, the protrusions can easily remove lint, hair or the like entangled around the brush (Paragraph 17). Further, the dot like protrusions (bristles) are known in the art for being able to bend to conform to a surface. As discussed by Liu, this can be used to clean the floor as well as clean the interior surface of the housing, which helps prevent debris from building up on the internal surfaces of the housing (Paragraphs 7-17). Claims 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tawara (US2014/0325774) in view of Dieudonne (De 102007052982A1) in view of Liu (WO2020199624A1) in view of Artal (DE102013222574A1). Regarding claims 19 and 20, Tawara in view of Dieudonne in view of Liu disclose the cleaning brush according to claim 1. Tawara fails to explicitly disclose wherein the first adhesive layer is formed by a first adhesive, the second adhesive layer is formed by a second adhesive, and a hot-melt temperature of the first adhesive is higher than a hot-melt temperature of the second adhesive. Artal teaches a method of boding a plurality of layers of differing material for a cleaning device, further wherein the first adhesive layer is formed by a first adhesive, the second adhesive layer is formed by a second adhesive, and a hot-melt temperature of the first adhesive is higher than a hot-melt temperature of the second adhesive (at least Paragraphs 6-7). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the type of adhesive used by Tawara in view of Dieudonne. It is possible to heat the adhesive layers by one heat source and to activate both adhesive layers all while decreasing the amount of energy used in the manufacturing steps. Thus saving time and energy (Artal paragraph 7). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 6/8/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues Liu is silent about a plurality of (dot like protrusions) bristles is arranged on the blade. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. As discussed above, given the broadest reasonable interpretation, the blade can be interpreted as the base in which the bristles extend from and the protrusion extends between the different blades. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOM R RODGERS whose telephone number is (313)446-4849. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at (313) 446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOM RODGERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 1 earlier event
Jun 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 04, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702257
HAND CLEANING TOOL INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL FINGER SCRAPERS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691557
Torque Stick and Wrench
5y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12672501
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF TREATING SUBSTRATE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660796
ANIMAL CLEANING DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653301
Oral Care Implement
4y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+59.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 386 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month