Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/043,741

NETWORK SLICE DETERMINATION METHOD, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND SYSTEM, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Mar 02, 2023
Examiner
PEREZ GUTIERREZ, RAFAEL
Art Unit
2642
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
14%
Grant Probability
At Risk
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
25%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 14% of cases
14%
Career Allow Rate
24 granted / 168 resolved
-47.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
189
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
57.7%
+17.7% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 168 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on December 16, 2025, have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 4 depends from a cancelled claim; therefore, it is indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al., US 12284525 B2, hereinafter “Wang.” Consider Claim 1 as amended. Wang discloses: a network slice determination method, performed by a terminal device (See column 1 lines 47-54: Systems, methods, and instrumentalities are provided for a network control node for connecting a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) to a network slice in a network. The network control node may receive service information associated with a service being requested by the WTRU), comprising: sending a slice query request to a server to indicate the server to determine available network slice information (See fig. 3 and column 11 lines 54-56: the WTRU may indicate services that the WTRU wants to use and the main control node may utilize the provided service information to select a slice): receiving the available network slice information by the server according to the slice query request (See column 1 lines 49-51: The network control node may receive service information associated with a service being requested by the WTRU), the available network slice information being configured to characterize at least one available network slice for the terminal device (See column 6 lines 46-51: the RAN may broadcast information associated with available network slices that the RAN belongs to or is connected to. The RAN may broadcast the information using air interface signaling (e.g., such as system information and/or beacon message). The network slice information for a particular network slice may include one or more of the following example fields or parameters: an identifier of the network slice, priority of the network slice, service class(es) served by the network slice, target device class, QoS targets, mobility support, security service, charging information, and/or performance information); determining a target network slice from the at least one available network slice according to the available network slice information (See column 24 lines 31-34 and 60-63: receive network slice selection policy information from a network, wherein the network slice selection policy information defines criteria for determining a session for accessing one or more network slices,… wherein the session associated with the target network slice is determined based on the criteria defined in the network slice selection policy information); applying for the target network slice to a core network (see column 12 lines 65-67 through column 13 lines 1-2: Once the NAS message reaches a control entity of the network slice for the core network connection selected by the RAN, the control entity may verify whether it may serve the WTRU for some or all of the required services -reads on target network slice); and establishing a session corresponding to the target network slice with a core network side (see column 12 lines 65-67 through column 13 lines 1-8: Once the NAS message reaches a control entity of the network slice for the core network connection selected by the RAN, the control entity may verify whether it may serve the WTRU for some or all of the required services. The verification may be made based on information included in the NAS message and/or other information (e.g., subscriber information, local policies, etc.). If the control entity determines that one or more of its supported slices can serve the WTRU service and that control entity is able to serve the WTRU for all of the services, the control entity may process the NAS message and respond to the WTRU); wherein the available network slice information is determined by the server according to at least one of the current position of the terminal device (see column 5 lines 64-67: The devices may be configured to discover what network slices are being provided by the operator (e.g., in the devices' current location and/or radio access network)) or the subscription information of the user in response to the slice query request (see column 6 lines 13-16: In an example, the network may select one or more network slice on behalf of the WTRU based on information stored about the WTRU (e.g., subscription information, capability information, etc.); see column 11 lines 54-58: the WTRU may indicate services that the WTRU wants to use and the main control node may utilize the provided service information to select a slice. The main control node may utilize subscription information for the WTRU to select a slice), and the available network slice information comprises an applicable service type of the available network slice and a position of the available network slice (see column 7 lines 35-37: A service class may indicate the target service type and/or user group that a network slice is intended to serve. See column 12 lines 15-24: The main control node may contact one or more network slices that may serve the WTRU (e.g., based on services requested by the WTRU). The main control node may forward the NAS message as received from the WTRU. The main control node may forward a sub-set of the NAS message, e.g., to include information related to the service type that the slice can offer but not include other information unrelated to the service(s) that can be provided by the network slice). Consider claim 3 as amended. Wang in view of Jin teaches claim 1; and Wang further discloses wherein the slice query request comprises information characterizing a current position of the terminal device (See column 5 lines 64-67: The devices may be configured to discover what network slices are being provided by the operator (e.g., in the devices' current location and/or radio access network)); and the available network slice information comprises network slice information of at least one available network slice for the terminal device at the current position (See column 8 lines 49-54: The slice information provided by the network server may be organized in different ways. In an example, the slice information may be organized based on the geographical locations in which the slices are available (e.g., such as an RAN IDs, cell IDs, various area IDs, network IDs, GPS coordinates, etc.)). Consider claim 5 as amended. Wang teaches claim 1, and further discloses receiving an input slice selection instruction configured to indicate the target network slice in the at least one available network slice (see column 14 lines 30-32); and determining the target network slice according to the slice selection instruction (see column 14 lines 37-44). Consider Claim 9 as amended. Wang discloses: a network slice determination method, performed by a server, (See column 6 lines 32-33: Methods may be defined for such application server triggered or assisted selection of a core network slice) comprising: in response to receiving a slice query request sent by a terminal device, determining at least one available network slice corresponding to the terminal device (See column 10 lines 41-45: The WTRU may use one or more pieces of the information described herein to match the preconfigured/target network slices with the discovered network slice information, and choose the serving network slice accordingly. See column 8 lines 44-50: A WTRU may receive network slice information from a network server (e.g., using Web APIs such as XML-based APIs or JSON). The network service may identify available network slices and/or may provide network slice information parameters for one or more slices (e.g., slice identifier, service classes, etc.). The slice information provided by the network server may be organized in different ways) according to at least one of the current position of the terminal device or the subscription information of the user in response to the slice query request (see column 5 lines 64-67: The devices may be configured to discover what network slices are being provided by the operator (e.g., in the devices' current location and/or radio access network)) or the subscription information of the user in response to the slice query request (see column 6 lines 13-16: In an example, the network may select one or more network slice on behalf of the WTRU based on information stored about the WTRU (e.g., subscription information, capability information, etc.); see column 11 lines 54-58: the WTRU may indicate services that the WTRU wants to use and the main control node may utilize the provided service information to select a slice. The main control node may utilize subscription information for the WTRU to select a slice); and sending available network slice information characterizing the at least one available network slice for the terminal device to the terminal device, the available network slice information being configured for the terminal device to select a target network slice from the at least one available network slice (See column 9 lines 60-67 through column 10 line 1: The WTRU may provide information, such as its service class, QoS requirements, mobility characteristics, etc., to help the network choose the slice. When a network supports network slicing and multiple network slices are deployed (e.g., to serve different target user groups and/or services), a WTRU may select (or be served by) a network slice, for example, based on the WTRU's services and/or characteristics), wherein the available network slice information comprises an applicable service type of the available network slice and a position of the available network slice (see column 7 lines 35-37: A service class may indicate the target service type and/or user group that a network slice is intended to serve. See column 12 lines 15-24: The main control node may contact one or more network slices that may serve the WTRU (e.g., based on services requested by the WTRU). The main control node may forward the NAS message as received from the WTRU. The main control node may forward a sub-set of the NAS message, e.g., to include information related to the service type that the slice can offer but not include other information unrelated to the service(s) that can be provided by the network slice). Consider claim 11 as mended. Wang teaches claim 9, and further discloses wherein the slice query request comprises information characterizing a current position of the terminal device (See column 5 lines 64-67: The devices may be configured to discover what network slices are being provided by the operator (e.g., in the devices' current location and/or radio access network)); and determining the at least one available network slice corresponding to the terminal device according to the slice query request comprises: querying the at least one available network slice corresponding to the terminal device at the current position according to the information characterizing the current position of the terminal device (See column 8 lines 49-54: The slice information provided by the network server may be organized in different ways. In an example, the slice information may be organized based on the geographical locations in which the slices are available (e.g., such as an RAN IDs, cell IDs, various area IDs, network IDs, GPS coordinates, etc.)). Consider claim 13 as mended. Wang teaches claim 1, and further discloses a communication device, comprising a processor, a memory and a communication bus (see fig. 8B), wherein the communication bus is configured to implement connection communication between the processor and the memory and the processor is configured to execute at least one program stored in the memory to perform the network slice determination method (See column 24 lines 10-14: In addition, the methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor). Consider claim 15. Wang teaches claim 1, and further discloses a computer-readable storage medium storing a first network slice determination program, wherein the first network slice determination program, when executed by at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform the network slice determination method (See column 24 lines 10-14: In addition, the methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor). Consider claim 17 as amended. Wang teaches claim 3, and further discloses receiving an input slice selection instruction configured to indicate the target network slice in the at least one available network slice (see column 14 lines 30-32); and determining the target network slice according to the slice selection instruction (see column 14 lines 37-44). Consider claim 18. Wang teaches claim 9, further discloses a communication device, comprising a processor, a memory and a communication bus, wherein: the communication bus is configured to implement connection communication between the processor and the memory; and the processor is configured to execute at least one program stored in the memory to perform the network slice determination method (See fig. 8B). Consider claim 19. Wang teaches claim 12, further discloses a communication device, comprising a processor, a memory and a communication bus, wherein: the communication bus is configured to implement connection communication between the processor and the memory; and the processor is configured to execute at least one program stored in the memory to perform the network slice determination method (See fig. 8B). Consider claim 20. Wang teaches claim 9, further discloses a computer-readable storage medium storing a second network slice determination program, wherein the second network slice determination program, when executed by one or more processors, causes at least one processor to perform the network slice determination method (See column 24 lines 11-14: In addition, the methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor). Consider claim 21. Wang teaches claim 12, further discloses a (See column 24 lines 11-14: In addition, the methods described herein may be implemented in a computer program, software, or firmware incorporated in a computer-readable medium for execution by a computer or processor). Claims 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Wang et al., US 12284525 B2, hereinafter “Wang,” in view of Zhu et al., US 11190987 B2, hereinafter “Zhu.” Consider claim 6. Wang teaches claim 5, but is silent regarding displaying the available network slice information and receiving a slice selection instruction issued based on displayed content. Zhu, in related art, suggests displaying the available network slice information; and receiving a slice selection instruction issued based on displayed content (see column 1 lines 66-67 through column 2 lines 1-7: According to a first aspect, an embodiment of this application provides a method for associating an application with a network slice, including: obtaining, by a terminal, display instruction information, an identifier of a first network slice that the terminal is allowed to access, and service feature information corresponding to the first network slice; displaying the service feature information corresponding to the first network slice on a first display interface of the terminal based on the display instruction information). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to consider Zhu’s teachings in relation to the claimed invention, thus providing means to implement configuration of a mapping relationship between an application and a slice type on a terminal side, thereby improving user experience, as discussed by Zhu (see column 1 lines 48-53). Consider claim 7. Wang in view of Zhu teaches claim 6; and Zhu further suggests determining a recommended network slice (see column 5 lines 11-16: the session management function network element instructs, by using the reassociation instruction information, the mobility management function network element to associate the application with a suggested network slice, and provides a network service for the application by using the suggested network slice); and wherein displaying the available network slice information comprises in response to the available network slice information being displayed, identifying network slice information corresponding to the recommended network slice by a recommendation identifier (see column 5 lines 21-29: The apparatus is applied to a terminal and includes: an obtaining unit, configured to obtain display instruction information, an identifier of a first network slice that the terminal is allowed to access, and service feature information corresponding to the first network slice; a display unit, configured to display the service feature information corresponding to the first network slice on a first display interface of the terminal based on the display instruction information). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to consider Zhu’s teachings in relation to the claimed invention, thus providing means to implement configuration of a mapping relationship between an application and a slice type on a terminal side, thereby improving user experience, as discussed by Zhu (see column 1 lines 48-53). Consider claim 8. Wang in view of Zhu teaches claim 7; and Wang further suggests , wherein determining a recommended network slice comprises any one of following modes: mode one: determining a commonly-used service type based on at least one of a frequency and a usage duration of a service by the terminal device; and identifying a network slice corresponding to the commonly-used service type as a recommended network slice; or mode two: determining a recommended network slice based on a usage duration of each network slice by the terminal device (see column 7 lines 33-37: An example of a network slice information parameter that may be utilized for network slice selection may include a service class. A service class may indicate the target service type and/or user group that a network slice is intended to serve). Pertinent Prior Art The following references, although not relied upon, are considered to be pertinent prior art since they disclose subject matter related to the invention claimed by the present application, i.e., mobility enhancement with network slicing. US 12356491 B2 US 11812377 B2 US 11812375 B2 US 11792723 B2 US 11743812 B2 US 11716669 B2 US 11638205 B2 US 11490326 B2 US 11457500 B2 US 11395220 B2 US 11284240 B2 US 20210306937 A1 US 11032858 B2 US 20210168906 A1 US 10820241 B2 US 10716096 B2 US 10506552 B2 US 10172009 B1 US 20180352501 A1 US 20180270743 A1 Conclusion Any response to this Office Action should be faxed to (571) 273-8300 or mailed to: Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand-delivered responses should be brought to Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the Examiner should be directed to Amancio González, whose telephone number is (571) 270-1106. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 8:00am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the Examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the Examiner’s supervisor, Rafael Perez-Gutierrez, can be reached at (571) 272-7915. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free) or 703-305-3028. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist/customer service whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. /AMANCIO GONZALEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2642 January 14, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112
Dec 16, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603419
DRIVING METHODS TO MINIMIZE THE EFFECT OF LEAKAGE CURRENT IN TUNABLE ELEMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581312
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPPORTING LOCATION AND COUNTRY DETERMINATION FOR 5G SATELLITE ACCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12541232
MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR DRIVING AN ANTENNA BASED ON THE POSITION OF A MOVABLE DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12543094
Adapting a Mobile Network Based on a Received Radio Link Failure (RLF) Indication
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12526861
Secure Connection for a Public Wireless Communications Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
14%
Grant Probability
25%
With Interview (+11.1%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 168 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month