Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/043,913

Hinge for Detachably and Pivotably Connecting a Leaf to a Base Part

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Examiner
SULLIVAN, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Dirak Dieter Ramsauer Konstruktionselemente GmbH
OA Round
4 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
670 granted / 1064 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
1106
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1064 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 7/25/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6, 10 and 11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 sets forth “a spring means” while Claim 6 sets froth “a second restoring force of the spring means” and Claim 10 sets forth “a third restoring force” and Claim 11 sets forth “the restoring force of the spring means or a second spring means”. This combination of claim limitations sets forth great confusion as to how many spring means exist. It is further unclear how a single spring means can produce multiple restoring forces. Although a coil spring can produce axial and torsional forces, not coil spring appears to be disclosed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 and 4-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hueul, DE 10 2004 036 731. Regarding Claim 1, Hueul teaches: a hinge pin (2a) extending along a pin axis (X), and at least one pin receiving element (1), which has a pin receiver (16) for at least partially receiving the hinge pin, wherein the hinge pin can be adjusted relative to the pin receiving element at least substantially perpendicular to the pin axis between a pivot position received at least partially in the pin receiver and an assembly position arranged outside the pin receiver, wherein the pin receiving element and the hinge pin can be pivoted relative to one another about the pin axis in the pivot position (see figs. 1-2), wherein a securing element (17) is provided which can be adjusted between a securing position for securing the hinge pin with respect to an unintentional adjustment from the pivot position to the assembly position at least substantially perpendicular to the pin axis and a release position for releasing the adjustment of the hinge pin at least substantially perpendicular to the pin axis from the pivot position to the assembly position (figs. 2-4), wherein the securing element can be moved positively from the release position into the securing position by adjusting the hinge pin from the assembly position into the pivot position (see 4, 6, 17, 22, see fig. 3), and wherein the securing element can be adjusted from the securing position into the release position by adjusting the hinge pin from the pivoted position into the assembly position in a positive-locking manner (see 4, 6, see figs. 3-4), and wherein the securing element can be adjusted from the release position in the direction of the securing position against a restoring force of a spring means, which restores the securing element into the release position (see 4, 6, see figs. 3-4). Regarding Claim 2, Hueul teaches: wherein the securing element (17) can be pivoted about a securing pivot axis (Y), at least substantially parallel to the pin axis of the hinge pin in the pivot position, between the securing position and the release position. Regarding Claim 4, Hueul teaches: wherein the pin receiver has an assembly opening (see below) for inserting the hinge pin into the pin receiver and removing the hinge pin from the pin receiver, wherein the assembly opening is at least partially closed by the securing element in the securing position (see fig. 3), and wherein the assembly opening is at least substantially released by the securing element in the release position (see 6, 7, 22). PNG media_image1.png 313 450 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding Claim 5, Hueul teaches: wherein the securing element (17) rests on the pin receiving element (1) in the release position in the direction of the restoring force returning the securing element to the release position (figs. 3-4). Regarding Claim 6, insofar as the claim is understood, Hueul teaches: wherein the securing element can be adjusted from the securing position in the direction of the release position against a second restoring force of the spring means, returning the securing element to the securing position (see 4, 6, see figs. 3-4), and wherein the securing element rests on the pin receiving element in the securing position in the direction of the second restoring force returning the securing element to the securing position (see figs. 3-4). Regarding Claim 7, Hueul teaches: wherein at least one locking element (22) is provided which can be adjusted between a locking position for positively blocking the adjustment of the securing element from the securing position to the release position and an unlocking position for releasing the adjustment of the securing element from the securing position to the release position (figs. 3-4), and wherein, in the securing position of the securing element, the locking element in the locking position engages in a positive-locking manner into a locking receptacle (8) of the securing element and in the unlocking position is arranged at least substantially outside the locking receptacle (figs. 3-4). Regarding Claim 8, Hueul teaches: wherein the locking element (22) is held on the pin receiving element (1) so as to be adjustable between the locking position and the unlocking position (see figs. 1-4). Regarding Claim 9, Hueul teaches: wherein the adjustment of the locking element (22) from the unlocking position to the locking position is blocked in a positive-locking manner by the securing element (17/8) in the release position and is released in the securing position. Regarding Claim 10, insofar as the claim is understood, Hueul teaches: wherein the locking element (22) can be adjusted from the locking position in the direction of the unlocking position, from the locking position to the unlocking position, against a third restoring force of the spring means (see 112 rejection, see element 6), returning the locking element to the locking position, and wherein the locking element (22) rests on the securing element (17, 8) in the locking position and/or unlocking position in the direction of the third restoring force returning the locking element to the locking position. Regarding Claim 11, insofar as the claim is understood, Hueul teaches: wherein the securing element (17) can be adjusted from the release position to the securing position against the restoring force of the spring means or a second spring means (see 4, 6), returning the securing element to the release position, and wherein the securing element rests on a locking element (22) in the release position and/or securing position in the direction of the restoring force returning the securing element to the release position (see figs. 3-4). Regarding Claim 12, Hueul teaches: wherein the locking element (22) can be adjusted from the locking position to the unlocking position and/or back without tools (see element 7). Regarding Claim 13, Hueul teaches: wherein the securing element (17) has a pin receiver (23) for at least partially receiving the hinge pin…and/or the hinge pin has an at least substantially circular cross-section (see 2a). Regarding Claim 14, Hueul teaches a door or flap (paragraph [0018]), a base part in the form of a frame (paragraph [0018]), at least one hinge (see figs. 1-4). For the remaining limitations of this claim see paragraphs [0001]-[0006] and rejection of Claim 13 above. Regarding Claim 15, see rejections above and disclosure of paragraphs [0001]-[0006] and note structure of the hinge disclosed in figs. 1-4 which demonstrate that the leaf can be in a closed or open position by rotating around the hinge pin while the securing element and element in blocked because the blocking is controlled by rod 7 and the operation of rod 7 is unrelated to the open or closed position of the leaf. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J SULLIVAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5218. The examiner can normally be reached IFP, Typically M-Th, 8:00-6:00, regular Fr availability. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.J.S/Examiner, Art Unit 3677 /JASON W SAN/SPE, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 03, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 07, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Nov 18, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jul 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Feb 10, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 25, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601212
VEHICLE DOOR HINGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601211
Hinge for a Flap of a Motor Vehicle
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599232
FURNITURE BODY HAVING A FRONT PANEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601213
ARRANGEMENTS FOR CLOSING ACCESS MEMBER, AND ACCESS MEMBER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590483
GUIDE DEVICE FOR GUIDING A FURNITURE PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.3%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1064 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month