Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/044,327

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PERFORMING COMMUNICATION ON BASIS OF SL DRX IN NR V2X

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 07, 2023
Examiner
KURIAN, ANDREW SHAJI
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
7 granted / 9 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
69.9%
+29.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 9 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed February 9, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The rejection overcomes Applicant’s arguments because Luo establishes that a first device obtains multiple SL DRX configurations and transmits control information indicating the selected DRX configuration to group members for groupcast communication, which inherently requires selecting and conveying the index information of one DRX configuration among plural configurations, while Freda expressly teaches that the selection of a particular DRX configuration (i.e., selecting one configuration from multiple available configurations, corresponding to its index) is based on an identifier of the transmitter (¶1232), which in a groupcast context serves as the representative device for the group, and further teaches that the DRX slot pattern or active subset may be determined based on a zone ID or geolocation of the device (¶1076–1077), thereby teaching selection of DRX configuration index information based on both (i) the representative device ID and (ii) the identity of the zone to which the group belongs, exactly as recited in claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 4-5, 7-11, 13, 21, 24-25, 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Luo et al. (US 20230171843 A1) in view of Freda et al. (US 20240381485 A1). Regarding claim 1, Luo et al. teaches a method comprising: obtaining, by a first device, one or more discontinuous reception (DRX) configurations (Paragraph 39, 48, 49, 58, These passages disclose that the first UE receives and determines one or multiple SL DRX configurations from the BS); transmitting, by the first device control information including the index information of the DRX configuration to at least one second device within the group (Paragraph 43, 49, 56, These passages disclose that the first UE transmits SL DRX configuration information to peer UEs via groupcast, broadcast, or PC5 RRC signaling, which constitutes control information conveying the selected DRX configuration to at least one second device in the group); and performing, by the first device, based on the DRX configuration, the groupcast communication with the at least one second device (Paragraph 39, 47, 58, These passages disclose that the first UE performs sidelink communication, including groupcast, with peer UEs based on the determined SL DRX configuration). Luo et al. does not explicitly teach selecting, by the first device, index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs. However, Freda et al. teaches selecting, by the first device, index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs (Paragraph 1228, 1232, 1076–1077, These passages teach selecting one DRX configuration (i.e., selecting its associated index among multiple configurations) for groupcast based on cast type, further based on a transmitter identifier, and additionally influenced by zone/location identity). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide selecting, by the first device, index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs as taught by Freda et al. in the system of Luo et al., so that it would enable context-aware and group-specific DRX selection to improve coordination efficiency, reduce signaling overhead, and optimize power consumption during groupcast communications. Regarding claim 4, Luo et al. teaches the index information of the DRX configuration is selected further based on a size of the group among the one or more DRX configurations (Paragraph 48, 49, 52, These passages teach selecting among multiple DRX configurations that are organized per destination identifier lists (i.e., groups), such that the configuration selection is dependent on the particular destination group). Regarding claim 5, Luo et al. teaches as the size of the group increases, an active time related to the DRX configuration is configured to be larger (Paragraph 48, 49, 52, when groupcast involves more destination UEs (i.e., a larger group), multiple DRX configurations are used with different parameters including longer cycles, periods, and inactivity timers, and the UE can request increased DRX duration). Regarding claim 7, Luo et al. teaches a number of devices within the group is not allowed to exceed a size of the group related to the DRX configuration (Paragraph 48, 49, These paragraphs describe groupcast DRX configurations where each group has its own Destination ID list and configuration). Regarding claim 8, Luo et al. teaches an active time related to the DRX configuration is divided into N sub-active times, and wherein N is a positive integer (Paragraph 41, 44, 45, These passages describe dividing the overall DRX active cycle (the “active time”) into a number N of DRX frames or slots, each having its own “on occasion”). Regarding claim 9, Luo et al. teaches a device within the group is allowed to use at least one sub-active time among the N sub-active times based on an ID of the device (Paragraph 44-46, These passages teach that each UE (device) determines one or more “SL DRX-on” durations (sub-active times) within a DRX cycle consisting of N sub-active times, where the selection of such sub-active times is calculated from formulas using the UE’s identifier (UE.ID, Source.ID, or Destination.ID)). Regarding claim 10, Luo et al. teaches a device within the group is allowed to use at least one sub-active time among the N sub-active times based on an ID of the device and an identity of a zone to which the device belongs (Paragraph 43–46, 49, These passages teach that a UE (device) determines specific DRX-on slots (sub-active times among a cycle of N slots) according to its UE ID and link-related identifiers (e.g., Destination ID or Source ID corresponding to a communication group/zone), thereby allowing the device to use particular sub-active times based on both its device ID and the identity of the group/zone to which it belongs). Regarding claim 11, Luo et al. teaches the ID of the device is at least one of a member ID of the device, a source ID of the device, or a destination ID of the device (Paragraph 36, 37, 43-45, The passage explicitly discloses that the device ID (UE_ID or UED) can represent a source ID or a destination ID used in sidelink communication, and by implication of being one of several identifiers within a group of communicating devices, it also serves as a member ID, thereby teaching that the ID of the device can be at least one of a member, source, or destination ID). Regarding claim 13, Luo et al. teaches the control information including the index information of DRX configuration is transmitted based on a DRX resource pool, wherein the DRX resource pool is a common resource pool used by devices performing DRX operations, and wherein the DRX configuration is a common DRX configuration used by devices within the group (Paragraph 46-49, The BS transmits DRX configuration control information based on a sidelink DRX resource pool (a bitmap-defined pool shared among devices), and the configuration is a common DRX setup that can be broadcasted or groupcasted for use by multiple UEs within the group). Regarding claim 21, Luo et al. teaches a first device comprising: at least one transceiver; at least one processor; and at least one memory connected to the at least one processor and storing instructions that, based on being executed by the at least one processor, cause the first device to perform operations (Paragraph 62, 64, 67, 68, 75, The UE includes at least one transceiver, processor, and memory storing executable instructions that enable the UE to perform the described functions) comprising: obtaining one or more discontinuous reception (DRX) configurations (Paragraph 49, 58, The UE receives and determines one or more SL DRX configurations, including multiple sets, thereby obtaining DRX configurations); transmitting control information including the index information of the DRX configuration to at least one second device within the group (Paragraph 43, 49, 56, The first UE transmits DRX configuration information via PC5 RRC or broadcast message to peer UE(s) in groupcast, constituting transmission of control information including DRX configuration identification); and performing, based on the DRX configuration, the groupcast communication with the at least one second device (Paragraph 47, 49, 58, The UE performs sidelink groupcast communication with one or more peer UEs based on the selected SL DRX configuration). Luo et al. does not explicitly teach selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs. However, Freda et al. teaches selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs (Paragraph 1228, 1232, 1076–1077, These passages teach selecting one DRX configuration (i.e., selecting its associated index among multiple configurations) for groupcast based on cast type, further based on a transmitter identifier, and additionally influenced by zone/location identity). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs as taught by Freda et al. in the system of Luo et al., so that it would enable context-aware and group-specific DRX selection to improve coordination efficiency, reduce signaling overhead, and optimize power consumption during groupcast communications. Regarding claim 24, Luo et al. teaches the index information of the DRX configuration is selected further based on a size of the group among the one or more DRX configurations (Paragraph 48, 49, 52, These passages teach selecting among multiple DRX configurations that are organized per destination identifier lists (i.e., groups), such that the configuration selection is dependent on the particular destination group). Regarding claim 25, Luo et al. teaches a processing device comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory connected to the at least one processor and storing instructions that, based on being executed by the at least one processor, cause a first device to perform operations (Paragraph 62, 64, 67, 68, 75, The UE includes at least one transceiver, processor, and memory storing executable instructions that enable the UE to perform the described functions)comprising: obtaining one or more discontinuous reception (DRX) configurations (Paragraph 49, 58, The UE receives and determines one or more SL DRX configurations, including multiple sets, thereby obtaining DRX configurations); transmitting control information including the index information of the DRX configuration to at least one second device within the group; and performing, based on the DRX configuration, the groupcast communication with the at least one second device. Luo et al. does not explicitly teach selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs. However, Freda et al. teaches selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs (Paragraph 1228, 1232, 1076–1077, These passages teach selecting one DRX configuration (i.e., selecting its associated index among multiple configurations) for groupcast based on cast type, further based on a transmitter identifier, and additionally influenced by zone/location identity). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide selecting index information of a DRX configuration for groupcast communication among the one or more DRX configurations, based on (i) an identifier (ID) of the first device serving as a representative of a group and (ii) an identity of a zone to which the group belongs as taught by Freda et al. in the system of Luo et al., so that it would enable context-aware and group-specific DRX selection to improve coordination efficiency, reduce signaling overhead, and optimize power consumption during groupcast communications. Regarding claim 28, Luo et al. teaches the index information of the DRX configuration is selected further based on a size of the group among the one or more DRX configurations (Paragraph 48, 49, 52, These passages teach selecting among multiple DRX configurations that are organized per destination identifier lists (i.e., groups), such that the configuration selection is dependent on the particular destination group). Regarding claim 29, Luo et al. teaches as the size of the group increases, an active time related to the DRX configuration is configured to be larger (Paragraph 48, 49, 52, when groupcast involves more destination UEs (i.e., a larger group), multiple DRX configurations are used with different parameters including longer cycles, periods, and inactivity timers, and the UE can request increased DRX duration). Allowable Subject Matter Based on the specification, the applicant could consider adding concepts clarifying that the selected DRX configuration is specifically a sidelink (SL) DRX configuration that includes both DRX cycle information and active time (on-duration) information, and that the selection ensures DRX alignment among UEs within the group to prevent missed receptions during groupcast communication. The claim could further incorporate that the first device transmits first sidelink control information (SCI) via a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH) to schedule a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH), and transmits second SCI via the PSSCH that explicitly includes the selected DRX configuration information and a destination ID associated with the group. Additional concepts that could be added include configuring or selecting independent DRX configurations for different groups within the same zone to disperse resource collisions in time, optimizing DRX selection based on geographical or zone-specific characteristics, and reflecting reliability and latency requirements of V2X scenarios in the DRX configuration. The applicant might also incorporate that the DRX configuration is applied for sidelink groupcast over a PC5 interface in an NR-based V2X environment, and that the alignment of DRX cycles among group members is performed to reduce power consumption while maintaining synchronized reception opportunities. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Freda et al. (US 20260059591 A1) Ganesan et al. (US 12550062 B2) Kwon et al. (US 12238809 B2) Thomas et al. (US 20230262648 A1) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW SHAJI KURIAN whose telephone number is (703)756-1878. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at (571) 272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW SHAJI KURIAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /IQBAL ZAIDI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 03, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588094
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING SMALL DATA TRANSMISSION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574960
MAINTAINING CHANNEL OCCUPANCY TIME IN SIDELINK COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563461
DISTRIBUTED MACHINE LEARNING SOLUTION FOR ROGUE BASE STATION DETECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12550012
NON TERRESTRIAL NETWORK NTN HANDOVER METHOD, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12489577
METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING DATA IN SHORT-RANGE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (-5.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 9 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month