Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/044,922

ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT, ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 10, 2023
Examiner
UHLIR, CHRISTOPHER J
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Casio Computer Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
72%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
529 granted / 849 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
903
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 849 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Receipt is acknowledged of applicant’s preliminary amendment filed March 10, 2023. Claims 1-8 are pending and an action on the merits is as follows. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed March 10, 2023 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(3)(i) because it does not include a concise explanation of the relevance, as it is presently understood by the individual designated in 37 CFR 1.56(c) most knowledgeable about the content of the information, of each reference listed that is not in the English language. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because the following element lacks proper antecedent basis in the claim: line 3: “the pitch” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2 and 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Daido et al. (US 2021/0256960 A1). Claims 1, 2 and 5-8: Daido et al. discloses an electronic musical instrument, an electronic musical instrument control method causing a processor of an electronic musical instrument to execute processing, and a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that stores a program for causing a processor of an electronic musical instrument to execute processing including a lyric output unit configured to output performance time lyric data (page 1 paragraph [0019]) indicating lyrics represented as a series of phonemes at a time of a performance and a pitch designation unit configured to output performance time pitch data (series of pitches) (page 6 paragraph [0061]). The performance time pitch data is designated in tune with an output of lyrics at the time of the performance based on synthesis data (XC) (page 2 paragraph [0026]), and a performance style output unit outputs performance time performance style data indicating a performance style at the time of the performance (page 1 paragraph [0019]). A sound generation/vocalization model unit configured, based on an acoustic model parameter (intermediate data Y) inferred by inputting the performance time lyric data, the performance time pitch data and the performance time performance style data to a trained acoustic model (first well-trained model M1), to synthesize and output singing voice sound data corresponding to the performance time lyric data, the performance time pitch data and the performance time performance style data, at the time of the performance (page 1 paragraph [0019], page 6 paragraph [0061]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Daido et al. (US 2021/0256960 A1) in view of Silverstein (US 2019/0237051 A1). Claim 3: Daido et al. discloses an electronic musical instrument as state above, but fails to disclose the performance style output unit to be configured to sequentially measure time intervals at which the pitch is designated at the time of the performance, and to sequentially output performance tempo data indicating the sequentially measured time intervals, as the performance time performance style data. However Silverstein teaches an electronic musical instrument where an output unit sequentially measures (analyzes) time intervals in real time on a time domain at which a pitch event is designated at a time of a performance, and sequentially outputs musical experience descriptors indicating the sequentially measured time intervals (page 6 paragraph [0059]). The musical experience descriptors includes performance tempo data (page 4 paragraph [0040]). Given the teachings of Silverstein, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the electronic musical instrument disclosed in Daido et al. with providing the performance style output unit to be configured to sequentially measure time intervals at which the pitch is designated at the time of the performance, and to sequentially output performance tempo data indicating the sequentially measured time intervals, as the performance time performance style data. Doing so would allow a user to “adjust the tempo … of the music” in order to “edit the music that has been created” as taught in Silverstein (page 39 paragraph [0430]). Claim 4: Daido et al. modified by Silverstein discloses an electronic musical instrument as state above, where the performance style output unit includes a changing means for allowing a user to intentionally change the performance tempo data obtained sequentially, as shown in Silverstein (page 39 paragraph [0430]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 8,115,089 B2, US 10,891,928 B2, US 9,355,628 B2, US 2022/0223125 A1, US 2018/0268792 A1 pertaining to synthesizing lyric data and pitch data as a performance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER UHLIR whose telephone number is (571)270-3091. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anita Coupe can be reached at 571-270-3614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Christopher Uhlir/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619 February 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 10, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595152
PRECISE ELEVATOR CAR SPEED AND POSITION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595154
ELEVATOR BRAKE DEVICE DETERIORATION PREDICTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589971
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY MODIFYING A CAPACITY LIMIT OF AN ELEVATOR CAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583711
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING ELEVATOR LOADS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562073
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LEARNING TO PLAY A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
72%
With Interview (+9.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 849 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month