Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/045,879

CEPHALOPOD REARING CAGE, CEPHALOPOD ESCAPE PREVENTION SHEET, AND USE THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§112§OTHER
Filed
Oct 12, 2022
Priority
Feb 14, 2018 — JP 2018-024387 +2 more
Examiner
PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
939 granted / 1073 resolved
+35.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1084
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112 §OTHER
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions The Applicant has elected claims 33 and 41-44 which includes the features of Species IIIA and IIIc Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 33 and 41-44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. In claim 33, lines 4 and 5, “the inside” lacks prior antecedent basis, in that, the particulars of the rearing cage has not been claimed. In claims 41 and 42, line 2, “4 mesh”, is unclear as to which international standard the Applicant is using to define the actual mesh size. See also, claim 43, line 2, “10 mesh” and claim 44, line 2, “180 mesh”. Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required: The inclined portion claimed in clam 33 lacks prior antecedent basis in the claim. The specification refers to a “folded portion 4” in para 0113 and 0131 instead of an “inclined portion”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claim(s) 33 and 41-43 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102b as being anticipated by Wu (CN 103598123 published on February 26, 2014). Regarding claim 33, Wu teaches a cephalopod rearing cage capable of containing a cephalopod alive throughout its life. The cage as shown in figure 4, includes a single mesh sheet and an inclined portion (unnumbered) extending from the side surface portion. See para 0029 of the English translation. Regarding claim 41, the 4 mesh is equal to 6.35mm, the mesh size discussed in para 0029 is 9mm or 15mm which is not less than 6.35mm. Regarding claim 42, in para 0029, the mesh size during the pelagic period is set at 3mm which is considered to be substantially near 4 mesh/6.36mm. Regarding claim 43, in para 0029, the mesh size during the growth stage is 9mm is substantially near 10 mesh or 2.54mm which is substantially near 3mm. Regarding claim 44, the 180 mesh is considered to be 180 openings per inch, which is also equal to 25.4mm/180=0.14mm, which makes the limit of not greater than 180 mesh to be openings that are not less than 0.14mm. Wu teaches mesh size of pelagic period setting is set to 3mm-1mm, see para 0029. Also, note that the 0.14mm by 0.14mm opening size are considered to be at least 0.15mm in size opening. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD T. PRICE JR whose telephone number is (571)272-6892. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter M. Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD T PRICE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 12, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §112, §OTHER
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112, §OTHER (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677840
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING MEAT FROM BONE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667111
Closing Machine For Closing Sausage Products
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660829
SWEEP EDGE BLADES FOR LOIN PULLER MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660830
TRUSSING SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642276
Systems And Methods For Rotating Products During Processing
9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.6%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month