Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/047,077

TECHNIQUES FOR COMMUNICATING USER EQUIPMENT CAPABILITY INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 17, 2022
Priority
Oct 20, 2021 — provisional 63/257,925
Examiner
TRAN, CONGVAN
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
1052 granted / 1178 resolved
+27.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1197
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§102
58.1%
+18.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1178 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on May 04, 2026 has been entered. Claims 1-2, 4, 12-13, 15, 23-26, 30-31 and 35-36 have been amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tripathi et al. (2021/0119861). Regarding claim 1, Tripathi discloses a method for wireless communications by a user equipment (UE) (see abstract, fig.3, elements 360, 340, fig.4, element 403, paragraphs [0019-0020], [0073-0074] and its description), comprising: receiving, from a network entity, a request for capability of the UE (see abstract, paragraph [0151]); and transmitting, in response to the request, a UE capability message that indicates different sets of features the UE supports in different network types (see abstract, paragraph [0151]). Regarding claim 2, Tripathi further discloses wherein the UE capability message indicates a first set of features the UE supports in terrestrial networks (TNs) from and a second set of features the UE supports in non-terrestrial network (NTNs) (see paragraphs [0006-0007], [0063], [0151]). Regarding claim 3, Tripathi further discloses wherein the request includes a radio access technology (RAT) type that indicates NTNs as a separate RAT (see abstract, fig.4, element 404/402, 405, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063] and its description). Regarding claim 4, Tripathi further discloses wherein the UE capability message further indicates sets of features the UE supports in NTNs with different orbit types (see abstract, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063-0065]). Regarding claim 5, Tripathi further discloses wherein the different orbit types comprise two or more of: a low earth orbit (LEO) orbit type, medium earth orbit (MEO) orbit type, highly elliptical orbit (HEO) orbit type, geostationary (GEO) orbit type, or a non-GEO orbit type (see abstract, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063-0065]). Regarding claim 6, Tripathi further wherein the UE capability message comprises: a first container indicating the first set of features the UE supports in TNs (see abstract, fig.1, element 116, 102, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0017], [0029-0030], [0063] and its description); and one or more second containers indicating the second set of features the UE supports in NTNs (see abstract, fig.4, element 403, 401/402, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0020], [0072-0074], [0063] and its description). Regarding claim 7, Tripathi further discloses wherein the UE capability message comprises a common container indicating: the first set of features the UE supports in TNs (see abstract, fig.1, element 116, 102, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0017], [0029- 0030], [0063] and its description); and the second set of features the UE supports in NTNs (see abstract, fig.1, element 116, 102, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0017], [0029- 0030], [0063] and its description). Regarding claim 8, Tripathi further discloses wherein: a common set of features in the common container apply to both TNs and NTNs networks by default (see abstract, fig1, fig.4, paragraph [0063] and description); and the common container includes an extension that differentiates features supported in only one of TNs or NTNs (see abstract, fig.1 or fig.4, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063] and its description). Regarding claim 9, Tripathi further discloses wherein the UE capability message comprises: a first container indicating the first set of features the UE supports in TNs and a first portion of the second set of features the UE supports in NTNs (see abstract, fig.1, fig.4, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063] and descriptions); and at least a second container indicating a second portion of the second set of features the UE supports in NTNs (see abstract, fig.1 or fig.4, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063] and its description). Regarding claim 10, Tripathi further discloses wherein the second container is limited to differential UE capability compared to first container (see abstract, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0032]). Regarding claim 11, Tripathi further discloses wherein the second set of features indicates a set of TN and NTN band combinations in which the UE supports at least one of carrier aggregation or dual connectivity (see abstract, fig.1 or fig.4, paragraphs [0006-0008], [0063] [0108], [0117], [0141] and its description). Regarding claim 12, Tripathi discloses a method for wireless communications by a network entity (see abstract, fig.1, element 102, fig.2, elements 230, 225, fig.4, element 401, paragraphs [0073-0076] and its description), comprising: transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), a request for capability of the UE (see abstract, fig.4, element 401, paragraphs [0073-0076], [0151] and its description); receiving, in response to the request, a UE capability message that indicates different sets of features the UE supports in different network types (see abstract, fig.4, element 401, paragraphs [0073-0076], [0151] and its description). Regarding claims 23-29 and 13-34 recite limitations substantially similar to the claims 1-12. Therefore, these claims were rejected for similar reasons as stated above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 35-36 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Examiner's Note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. When responding to this Office Action, Applicant is advised to clearly point out the patentable novelty which he or she thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He or she must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections See 37 CFR 1.111(c). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CongVan Tran whose telephone number is (571) 272-7871. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached on (571) 270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 100 100 media_image1.png Greyscale UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE /CONGVAN TRAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Dec 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2026
Notice of Allowance
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684320
TECHNIQUES FOR ESTABLISHING CONNECTIVITY TO A SERVICE-BASED NETWORK VIA A RADIO ACCESS NETWORK
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684338
STEERING UE CAPABILITY INFORMATION BASED ON NETWORK CAPABILITY FEATURES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684383
RELAXATION MEASUREMENT PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683888
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY TESTING A NETWORK SWITCH
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684439
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+4.9%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1178 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month