Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/048,200

ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND, ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 20, 2022
Priority
Oct 21, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0141368 +1 more
Examiner
GARRETT, DAWN L
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
695 granted / 960 resolved
+7.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1026
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.8%
+23.8% vs TC avg
§102
3.6%
-36.4% vs TC avg
§112
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 960 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the amendment received February 24, 2026. Claims 1, 8, 9, 13, and 14 were amended. Claims 11 and 12 are canceled claims. Claims 1-10 and 13-20 are pending. The certified copy of the foreign priority document received December 5, 2025 is acknowledged. The certified translations of the foreign priority documents received February 24, 2026 are acknowledged. The rejection of claims 1-13 and 15-20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Choung et al. (US 2023/0203075 A1) is withdrawn due to the perfection of the foreign priority dates. The rejection of claims 1-13 and 15-20 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Layek et al. (US 2021/0399236 A1) is withdrawn due to the claim amendment received February 24, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 13 defines a variable R46, but it is not seen where a R46 group is located within compound structures as presently claimed. Accordingly, claim 13 is considered indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 and 14-20 are allowed. The closest prior art is considered to be Layek et al. (US 2021/0399236 A1), which was discussed in the last office action. Layek et al. fails to teach or to render obvious organometallic complexes including specific Ln2 ligands as presently claimed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Dawn Garrett whose telephone number is (571)272-1523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday (Eastern Time). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAWN L GARRETT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Feb 05, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12622131
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612418
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT COMPOUND, A PLURALITY OF HOST MATERIALS, AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12615905
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12595256
COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC ELECTRONIC DEVICES
5y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598910
COMPOUND AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
4y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+10.1%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 960 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month