Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/049,491

ISOLATED POWER SUPPLY FOR GATE DRIVER

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 25, 2022
Examiner
LIAN, MANG TIN BIK
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Delta Electronics Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
921 granted / 1312 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
82 currently pending
Career history
1394
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-20 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Huang et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2010/0066474 A1). With respect to claim 1, Huang et al., hereinafter referred to as “Huang,” teaches a power transformer 300 (FIG. 3), comprising: a primary winding 130 or 330 and a secondary winding 340; a primary magnetic core 300a (annotated FIG. 3) wound by the primary winding; a secondary magnetic core 300b wound by the secondary winding; and a coupling coil 310 wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores as a whole (para. [0026]). PNG media_image1.png 460 580 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Blanke (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2015/0332838 A1) in view of Huang. With respect to claim 1, Blanke teaches a power transformer (Figs. 1 and 2, or Figs. 11 and 12 provided below for convenience) comprising: a primary winding 1 and a secondary winding 2; a primary magnetic core 4 wound by the primary winding; a secondary magnetic core 5 wound by the secondary winding; and a coupling coil 3 wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores (paras. [0030], [0032] and [0046]). PNG media_image2.png 454 648 media_image2.png Greyscale Blanke does not expressly teach a coupling coil wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores as a whole. Huang teaches a power transformer 300 (FIG. 3), comprising: a coupling coil 310 wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores 300a and 300b (annotated FIG. 3 above) as a whole (para. [0026]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the coupling coil surrounding the primary and secondary cores as a whole as taught by Huang to the power transformer of Blanke to reduce core size while controlling leakage inductance so that devices receiving power from the electrical conversion circuits will be supplied with a consistent voltage supply (para. [0003]). With respect to claim 2, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 1, wherein the primary winding comprises a first top coil 11 (Figs. 1 and 2) and a first bottom coil 14 electrically connected to the first top coil, and wherein the secondary winding comprises a second top coil 21 and a bottom coil 24 electrically connected to the second top coil (Blanke, paras. [0030] and [0031]). With respect to claim 3, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 2, wherein the coupling coil is a closed loop disposed between the first and second top coils and the first and second bottom coils (Blanke, [para. [0032]). With respect to claim 4, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 2, further comprising a printed circuit board (PCB) 6 having a first hole 61 and or 62 and a second hole 63 and or 64, wherein the first top coil of the primary winding and the second top coil of the secondary winding are disposed on a top surface of the PCB, wherein the first bottom coil of the primary winding and the second bottom coil of the secondary winding are disposed on a bottom surface of the PCB, and wherein the coupling coil is embedded in a central layer of the PCB (Blanke, paras. [0030] and [0032]). With respect to claim 5, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 4, wherein the primary magnetic core is inserted in the first hole, and the secondary magnetic core is inserted in the second hole (Blanke, para. [0030]). With respect to claim 6, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 1, further comprising a printed circuit board (PCB) 6 (Figs. 11 and 12) having a first hole 61 and or 62 and a second hole 63 and or 64, wherein the primary and secondary windings are embedded in a central layer of the PCB, and wherein the coupling coil is disposed on a surface (upper or lower surface) of the PCB (Blanke, para. [0046]). With respect to claim 7, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 1, wherein the coupling coil comprises a first closed loop 31 and a second closed loop 32 (Blanke, paras. [0032 and [0046]). With respect to claim 8, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 7, wherein the primary and secondary windings are disposed between the first and second closed loops of the coupling coil (Blanke, paras. [0032 and [0046]). With respect to claim 9, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 8, further comprising a printed circuit board (PCB) 6 (Figs. 11 and 12) having a first hole 61 and or 62 and a second hole 63 and or 64, wherein the primary and secondary windings are embedded in a central layer of the PCB, wherein the first closed loop of the coupling coil is disposed on a top surface of the PCB, and wherein the second closed loop of the coupling coil is disposed on a bottom surface of the PCB (Blanke, paras. [0032 and [0046]). With respect to claim 10, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the power transformer of claim 9, wherein the primary magnetic core is inserted in the first hole, and the secondary magnetic core is inserted in the second hole (Blanke, para. [0030]). With respect to claim 11, Blanke teaches a printed circuit board (PCB) 6 (Figs. 8-9 provided below for convenience), comprising: a primary winding 1 wound about a first hole 61 of the PCB; a secondary winding 2 wound about a second hole 62 of the PCB; and a coupling coil 3 forming a closed loop that surrounds the first and second holes of the PCB, wherein the first hole is configured to receive a primary magnetic core 4, the second hole is configured to receive a secondary magnetic core 5 (para. [0044]). PNG media_image3.png 450 594 media_image3.png Greyscale Blanke does not expressly teach the coupling coil is configured to e wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores as a whole. Huang teaches a power transformer 300 (FIG. 3), Wherein the coupling coil 310 is configured to be wound around the primary and secondary magnetic cores 300a and 300b (annotated FIG. 3 above) as a whole (para. [0026]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the coupling coil wound around the primary and secondary cores as a whole as taught by Huang to the power transformer of Blanke to reduce core size while controlling leakage inductance so that devices receiving power from the electrical conversion circuits will be supplied with a consistent voltage supply (para. [0003]). With respect to claim 12, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11, wherein the coupling coil is embedded in a central layer of the PCB (Blanke, para. [0044]). With respect to claim 13, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 12, wherein the coupling coils comprises a plurality of conductive loops 31 and 32 that are electrically insulated from each other (Blanke, para. [0044]). With respect to claim 14, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11, wherein the primary winding comprises a top layer 11 on a top surface of the PCB and a bottom layer 14 on a bottom surface of the PCB, the top and bottom layers of the primary winding being electrically connected (Blanke, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 15, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11, wherein the secondary winding comprises a top layer 21 on a top surface of the PCB and a bottom layer 24 on a bottom surface of the PCB, the top and bottom layers of the secondary winding being electrically connected (Blanke, para. [0031]). With respect to claim 16, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11. Blanke in view of Huang does not teach, in the embodiment of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke, wherein the primary and secondary windings are embedded in a central layer of the PCB. wherein the primary and secondary windings are embedded in a central layer of the PCB. Blanke teaches, in the embodiment of Figs. 11 and 12, a PCB 6, wherein the primary and secondary windings 1 and 2 are embedded in a central layer of the PCB (para. [0046]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the primary and secondary windings embedded in the PCB as taught by Figs. 11 and 12 of Blanke to the PCB of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke in view of Huang to protect the windings from foreign objects. With respect to claim 17, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11. Blanke in view of Huang does not teach, in the embodiment of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke, wherein the coupling coil is disposed on a top surface of the PCB. Blanke teaches, in the embodiment of Figs. 11 and 12, a PCB 6, wherein the coupling coil is 3 disposed on a top surface (upper surface) of the PCB (para. [0046]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the coupling coil on the top surface of the PCB as taught by Figs. 11 and 12 of Blanke to the PCB of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke in view of Huang improve ease of forming the coupling coil. With respect to claim 18, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11. Blanke in view of Huang does not teach, in the embodiment of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke, wherein the coupling coil comprises a first coupling coil and a second coupling coil, wherein the first coupling coil is disposed on a top surface of the PCB and the second coupling coil is disposed on a bottom surface of the PCB. Blanke teaches, in the embodiment of Figs. 11 and 12, a PCB 6, wherein the coupling coil 3 comprises a first coupling coil 31 and a second coupling coil 32, wherein the first coupling coil is disposed on a top surface (upper surface) of the PCB and the second coupling coil is disposed on a bottom surface (lower surface) of the PCB (para. [0046]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the coupling coil on the top surface of the PCB as taught by Figs. 11 and 12 of Blanke to the PCB of Figs. 8 and 9 of Blanke in view of Huang improve ease of forming the first and second coupling coils. With respect to claim 19, Blanke in view of Huang teaches the PCB of claim 11, further comprising primary terminals (ends) to receive an input voltage (not expressly shown) applied to the primary winding (Blanke, para. [0044]). With respect to claim 20, Blanke in view of Huang in view of teaches the PCB of claim 11, further comprising secondary terminals (ends) to provide an output voltage (not expressly shown) induced by the secondary winding (Blanke, para. [0044]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANGTIN LIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 0800-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S. Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG TIN BIK LIAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 14, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603211
COIL COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597557
Dry High Voltage Instrument Transformer
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597554
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597556
TRANSFORMER DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586715
Coil Component
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month