Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/050,451

OSCILLATOR CIRCUIT HAVING TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION BASED ON RESONATOR GROUP-DELAY ANALYSIS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 27, 2022
Examiner
CHANG, JOSEPH
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Texas Instruments Incorporated
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
1044 granted / 1164 resolved
+21.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1179
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
30.7%
-9.3% vs TC avg
§102
38.8%
-1.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1164 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 5, 11-13, 19, 21-22 and 24-25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bahr (US 11,303,288). Regarding claim 1, Bahr discloses an apparatus (FIG 1), comprising: an oscillator circuit (116) having an oscillator output (124), the oscillator circuit including a compensation circuit (104) having a resonator (106) and a resonator delay analyzing circuit (DPLL inherently comprising resonator or in the VCO analyzing loop delay by a phase detector) coupled to an output of the resonator (VCO connected to PD by feedback loop); and a clock generation circuit (Column 1, lines 12-13 implies) having an input (necessarily present at the stage in which 124 feeds) coupled to the oscillator output (124). Regarding claim 2|1, Bahr discloses the apparatus wherein: the resonator is a first resonator (106); the oscillator circuit includes a second resonator (114); and the oscillator circuit includes an oscillator control circuit (102) having an input (102B), a first output (connection to 114), and a second output (102A), the input of the oscillator control circuit coupled to an output of the resonator delay analyzing circuit (DPLL 106), the first output of the oscillator control circuit coupled to the second resonator, and the second output of the oscillator control circuit coupled to the oscillator output. Regarding claim 5|2|1, Bahr discloses the apparatus wherein the resonator delay analyzing circuit is configured to provide a signal representing a group delay of the first resonator (feedback loop in the DPLL). Regarding claim 11|2|1, Bahr discloses/implies the apparatus wherein the second resonator has second-order frequency variation as a function of temperature, and the first resonator has first-order frequency variation as a function of temperature (it is noted that all resonators have some degree of frequency variation as a function of temperature). Regarding claim 12, Bahr discloses an apparatus (FIG 1), comprising: an oscillator circuit (116) including a first resonator (114), an oscillator control circuit (102) coupled to the first resonator and having an oscillator output (102A or 124), and a temperature compensation circuit (104) coupled to the oscillator output and including a second resonator (106, resonator in DPLL); and a clock generation circuit (Column 1, lines 12-13 implies) having an input coupled to the oscillator output (124). Regarding claim 13|12, Bahr discloses the apparatus wherein the oscillator circuit includes a controller (108) configured to determine a temperature (110) based on a property of the second resonator (resonator in DPLL) and provide a control signal (108B and 102B) based on the temperature to the oscillator control circuit. Regarding claim 19|12, Bahr discloses/implies the apparatus wherein the first resonator has second-order frequency variation as a function of temperature, and the second resonator has first-order frequency variation as a function of temperature (it is noted that all resonators have some degree of frequency variation as a function of temperature). Regarding claim 21|1, Bahr implies the apparatus further comprising a circuitry (Column 1, lines 12-13 implies) coupled to an output of the clock generation circuit (124). Regarding claim 22|21|1, Bahr implies the apparatus wherein the circuitry includes at least one of: a microprocessor, a memory, or a programmable logic circuit (Column 1, lines 12-13 implies). Regarding claim 24|21|1, Bahr discloses the apparatus wherein the resonator includes an electroacoustic resonator (MEMS resonator). Regarding claim 25|1, Bahr implies the apparatus wherein the resonator has positive and negative peaks of group delay at two different frequencies (MEMS resonator). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 16, 20 and 23 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bahr. Regarding claim 16, Bahr discloses the apparatus except further comprising a divider circuit coupled between the oscillator output and an input of the temperature compensation circuit. As known in the art, such divider circuit is used in PLL circuit for frequency adjustment and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use such divider circuit because such a modification would have been a mere substitution of art recognized equivalent feedback scheme in PLL. Regarding claim 20, Bahr discloses the apparatus except wherein the oscillator control circuit includes a transimpedance amplifier (TIA) coupled across the first resonator. As known in the art, TIA is used in oscillator circuit for frequency signal enhancement and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use such device because such a modification would have been a mere substitution of art recognized equivalent amplifier in oscillators. Regarding claim 23, Bahr discloses the apparatus except wherein the oscillator circuit, the clock generation circuit, and the circuitry are within an integrated circuit package. As known in the art, IC is used to integrate circuits to save space and therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to integrate the circuitry because such a modification would have been a mere substitution of art recognized equivalent IC. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-4, 6-10, 14-15 and 17-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Bahr does not disclose nor suggest the claimed invention including “an amplitude modulation circuit” recited in claims 3 and 17; “a mixer circuit …” recited in claims 4 and 18; “a second resonator delay analyzing circuit” recited in claims 6-10; “at least one of a group delay amplitude or a phase delay sign” recited in claims 14 and 15. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Nelson (US 2019/0007055) discloses clock synchronization and compensation of signal path delay variation showing a system clock PLL, output distribution and system clock compensation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Joseph Chang whose telephone number is (571)272-1759. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:00- 17:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Menatoallah Youssef can be reached at 571-270-3684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2849
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 27, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
May 22, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 04, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 09, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 07, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 10, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 18, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 07, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603609
QUADRATURE OSCILLATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592586
Apparatus and Methods for Real-Time Resonance Adaptation for Power Receiver
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592706
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A MAGNETRON CAVITY FOR ATOMIC CLOCKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573890
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PROFILES IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567765
INPUT CIRCUIT FOR A WIRELESS POWER RECEIVER, WIRELESS POWER RECEIVER, AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE WIRELESS POWER RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+3.7%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1164 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month