Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/050,984

Ergonomic Handle Scraper

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Oct 29, 2022
Examiner
COLILLA, DANIEL JAMES
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Unknown
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
805 granted / 1197 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1197 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 7/19/2025 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent No. 11,529,654 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Drawings Replacement drawings were received on 7/19/2025. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Objections Claims 3 and 16 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 3, line 6, “a longitudinal axis” appears to be a double recitation of “the longitudinal axis” recited at the end of line 5 and the beginning of line 6. In claim 3, lines 7-8, “wherein the deepest portion of the saddle intersects the perimeter edge surface of the gripping end” is a double recitation of that which had immediately, previously been recited. This objection could be overcome by replacing the noted language with simply, --wherein the deepest portion--. In claim 16, line 16, “the . . . scraping surface” has no proper antecedent basis in the claims. In line 14, Applicant has introduced, “an additional scraping surface.” Appropriate correction is required. Claims 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 15 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wilson (US 5,481,805). With respect to claim 1, Wilson discloses an ergonomic handle scraper comprising a right topside surface, a left topside surface, front topside surface, left underside surface, right underside surface, and a front underside surface as shown below in the image taken from Fig. 4 of Wilson: [AltContent: textbox (a front topside surface)][AltContent: ] [AltContent: textbox (a topside convex surface)][AltContent: textbox (an underside concave surface)][AltContent: textbox (front underside surface)][AltContent: textbox (a left topside surface)][AltContent: textbox (a perimeter edge surface)][AltContent: textbox (right underside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (left underside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (a right topside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 293 540 media_image1.png Greyscale With respect to claim 2, Wilson discloses a generally concave, arched or vaulted surface area that forms a portion of the underside of the device as shown below in the image taken from Fig. 4 of Wilson: [AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (topside and underside meet at perimeter edge)][AltContent: textbox (a generally convex, arched or vaulted surface area)][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (a generally concave, arched or vaulted surface area)][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 293 540 media_image1.png Greyscale a generally convex, arched or vaulted surface area forms a portion of the topside of the device (as indicated above); wherein the topside and underside meet, forming a perimeter edge surface around the device (as indicated above). With respect to claim 3, Wilson discloses an ergonomic handle scraper comprising a topside convex surface, an underside concave surface, a perimeter edge surface, a right topside surface, a left topside surface, a front topside surface, a front end, a gripping end, a saddle formed by a left underside surface, a right underside surface, and a front underside surface, as shown in the image below taken from Fig. 4 of Wilson: [AltContent: textbox (a front topside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: oval][AltContent: textbox (a topside convex surface)][AltContent: textbox (an underside concave surface)][AltContent: textbox (front underside surface)][AltContent: textbox (a left topside surface)][AltContent: textbox (a perimeter edge surface)][AltContent: textbox (right underside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (front end)][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (left underside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (a right topside surface)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: ] PNG media_image1.png 293 540 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (gripping end)] [AltContent: textbox (saddle)] Wilson further discloses that a raised portion of the saddle commences at an approximate center of the saddle along the longitudinal axis and extends along a longitudinal axis to the edge of the saddle to the gripping end where the deepest portion of the saddle intersects the perimeter edge surface at the gripping end as shown below in the image taken from Fig. 4 of Wilson: [AltContent: textbox (longitudinal axis)][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (approximate center of saddle)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (perimeter edge of saddle/gripping end)][AltContent: ][AltContent: arc] PNG media_image1.png 293 540 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (deepest portion of saddle and greatest depth of concave surface)] wherein the deepest portion of the saddle intersects the perimeter edge surface at the gripping end protects the user’s hand, thumb, or digits and is capable of preventing the user’s hand, thumb or digits from interfering with a surface on which an activity is being performed. With respect to claim 4, Wilson discloses that the perimeter edge surface meets the underside concave surface at the greatest depth of the concave surface (as indicated above). With respect to claim 5, Wilson discloses that the topside right surface, topside left surface, topside front surface, underside left surface, underside right surface, underside front surface all are curved. Note, the limitations of claim 5 are entirely optional since Applicant used the phrase “may be.” With respect to claim 6, Wilson discloses that the topside convex surface and the underside concave surface are constructed to form smooth, gradual curved surfaces as shown in Fig. 4 of Wilson. With respect to claim 7, Wilson discloses that the topside convex surface and underside concave surface are constructed to form an arched, angular, or vaulted surface as indicated in the above figures. [AltContent: textbox (front right corner)] With respect to claim 8, Wilson discloses that the perimeter edge surface is constructed to form a front left corner and front right corner as shown below in the image taken from Fig. 5 of Wilson: [AltContent: textbox (front left corner)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ] PNG media_image2.png 135 186 media_image2.png Greyscale With respect to claim 15, Wilson discloses one an additional scraping surface attached at various points (interpreted as a single point of attachment) throughout the device (the knife 26 as disclosed in col. 3, line 48 of Wilson is considered an additional scraping surface). With respect to claim 17, Wilson discloses that the additional scraping surface 26 is attached along the edge perimeter surface (although not shown, the scraping surface 26 would be at the head location 20 as shown in Fig. 4 of Wilson). With respect to claim 18, Wilson discloses that the edge perimeter surface is from a variety of shapes and contours (as shown in Fig. 5 of Wilson the edge perimeter includes various arcs, curves and corners). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 16-17 str objected to as containing the above mentioned informality, but would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the informality. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 7/19/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive of any error in the above rejection. Regarding claim 1, Applicant argues that Wilson does not teach that a raised portion of the saddle commences at an approximate center of the saddle and extends along a longitudinal axis to the edge of the saddle to the gripping end where the deepest portion of the saddle intersects the perimeter edge surface at the gripping end. However, this language is not recited in claims 1 and therefore is not required to be met by Wilson. Claim 1 does not recite a “saddle” at all. Regarding claim 3, Applicant also argues that claim 3 does not disclose the above mentioned language. However, it is noted that claim 3 recites that the saddle is formed by “a left underside surface, a right underside surface, and a front underside surface.” The specification identifies these surfaces as 130, 140, and 150, respectively. Fig. 4 of Applicant’s drawings shows these surfaces and it appears that they make up the entirety of the scraper. Thus, the term saddle is being interpreted as the entire ergonomic handle scraper. Therefore, the image used in the above rejection of claim 3 and reprinted below is accurate: [AltContent: textbox (longitudinal axis)][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (approximate center of saddle)][AltContent: ][AltContent: ][AltContent: textbox (perimeter edge of saddle/gripping end)][AltContent: ][AltContent: arc] PNG media_image1.png 293 540 media_image1.png Greyscale [AltContent: textbox (deepest portion of saddle and greatest depth of concave surface)] A raised portion of the saddle commences at a n approximate center of the saddle along the longitudinal axis. The approximate center of the saddle Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J COLILLA whose telephone number is (571)272-2157. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Daniel J Colilla/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 29, 2022
Application Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
Jul 18, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600476
LOCKING DEVICE AND CARGO DECK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600287
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RESTRAINING CARTS AND OTHER CARGO USING FORWARD AND REARWARD BRACKETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600410
VEHICLE SUBFRAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600279
VEHICULAR DOOR TRIM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589807
VEHICLE BATTERY CASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1197 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month