Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/052,291

HEAD UP OR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY ARRANGEMENT AND A METHOD FOR PRESENTING AT LEAST ONE IMAGE VIA AT LEAST ONE SURFACE ELEMENT OF A HEAD UP OR HEAD MOUNTED DISPLAY ARRANGEMENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 03, 2022
Examiner
BROOKS, JERRY L.
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Saab AB
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
553 granted / 794 resolved
+1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
826
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
30.8%
-9.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/28/2026 has been entered. Election/Restrictions Claims 17, 19 and 20 are rejoined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 15, 17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miki (JP H0688960 A) in view of Ogasawara (JP H10319343 A). With respect to claims 15, 17, and 20, Miki discloses a method comprising: a method comprising: generating an image in a first image plane (fig.1, 21a and 22a), transmitting said image through a fiber optic face plate (fig.1) said fiber optic face plate comprising a first side having a first surface lying in the first image plane (21a), and a second side having a second surface lying in a second image plane (see the other end of 1 in fig.1), and projecting the image from the second surface (fig.1), wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes (21a and 22a) each first part image plane (21a and 22a) associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate and the first part surfaces (21a and 22) of the first side of the fiber optic face plate are arranged in different surface planes (see fig.1), that are not parallel with the second image plane of the second surface (see the arrangement of planes of 21 and 22a). Miki does not disclose a method for presenting at least one image via at least one surface element of a head up or head mounted display arrangement, projecting via the surface element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, wherein the image at the second surface is projected to at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, said at least one beam splitter projecting light incident from the second surface to the at least one surface element so that the image of the second image plane is directed to the surface element via said at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element, wherein said surface element is a combiner. Ogasawara discloses a method for presenting at least one image via at least one surface element (see 62) of a head up or head mounted display arrangement (see fig.3b), projecting via the surface element (62) arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface (4b), wherein the image at the second surface is projected to at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element (see 63) arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface (see 4b), said at least one beam splitter (see 63) projecting light incident from the second surface to the at least one surface element (see 62 in fig.3b) so that the image of the second image plane is directed to the surface element (62) via said at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element (see the operation fig.3b), wherein said surface element is a combiner (see 62). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Miki with the method steps of Ogasawara so as to include the method for presenting at least one image via at least one surface element of a head up or head mounted display arrangement, projecting via the surface element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, wherein the image at the second surface is projected to at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, said at least one beam splitter projecting light incident from the second surface to the at least one surface element so that the image of the second image plane is directed to the surface element via said at least one semi-transparent beam splitting element, wherein said surface element is a combiner to enhance visual experience by reduce eye fatigue, and improving user safety by displaying information while permitting environmental awareness. Claim(s) 16 and 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miki (JP H0688960 A) in view of Ogasawara (JP H10319343 A) and Kurata (EP 550155 A2). With respect to claims 16 and 18, Miki in view of Ogasawara discloses the method of claim 15, but does not disclose wherein the second surface comprises a plurality of part surfaces each intended for a dedicated surface element and wherein at least two image generating elements each generate an image in the first part image plane at its associated first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate. Kurata discloses wherein the second surface comprises a plurality of part surfaces each intended for a dedicated surface element (see 440 in fig.28 and also see 333 in fig.20D; also the use of the phrase “intended for a dedicated …” is interpreted as intended use), wherein at least two image generating elements each generate an image in the first part image plane at its associated first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate (see the operation and plurality of image generating units disclosed in fig.11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Miki in view of Ogasawara with the teaching of Kurata so that the second surface comprises a plurality of part surfaces each intended for a dedicated surface element and wherein at least two image generating elements each generate an image in the first part image plane at its associated first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate to enhance image quality and brightness. Claim(s) 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Miki (JP H0688960 A) in view of Ogasawara (JP H10319343 A) and Sakai (United States Patent Publication 5,502,457) With respect to claim 19, Miki in view of Ogasawara discloses the method of claim 15, but does not disclose wherein for each position of the first surface incident light is transmitted to a plurality of second surface parts. Sakai disclose wherein for each position of the first surface incident light (see the bottom first surface of each optical fiber 3 and the light that inters therein in fig.4) is transmitted to a plurality of second surface parts (see the plurality of second surface parts 30). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify Miki in view of Ogasawara with the teaching of Sakai so that for each position of the first surface incident light is transmitted to a plurality of second surface parts to enhance image quality by reducing moiré fringes and the deterioration of the resolution of the display. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-31 are allowed. With respect to claim 21, the prior art does not disclose or suggest a method for presenting at least one image via at least one surface element of a head up or head mounted display arrangement, said method comprising: generating an image in a first image plane, transmitting said image through a fiber optic face plate said fiber optic face plate comprising a first side having a first surface lying in the first image plane, and a second side having a second surface lying in a second image plane, and projecting the image from the second surface via the surface element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes each first part image plane associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate, and the fiber optic faceplate is arranged to transfers at least parts of the images from the plurality of first part surfaces to mutually overlapping positions in a common second surface. With respect to claim 22-26, they are allowed as they depend from allowed claim 21. With respect to claim 27, the prior art of record does not discloses or suggest a method for presenting at least one image via at least one surface element of a head up or head mounted display arrangement, said method comprising: generating an image in a first image plane, transmitting said image through a fiber optic face plate said fiber optic face plate comprising a first side having a first surface lying in the first image plane, and a second side having a second surface lying in a second image plane, and projecting the image from the second surface via the surface element arranged in the beam path of light emitted from the second surface, wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes each first part image plane associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate, the second image plane comprises a plurality of second part image planes each second part image plane associated with an individual second part surface of the second side of the fiber optic face plate, and for each position of the first surface, incident light is divided and divergently transmitted to a plurality of second part surfaces. With respect to claim 28-31, they are allowed as they depend from allowed claim 27. The closest prior art of record, Miki, discloses a method comprising: a method comprising: generating an image in a first image plane (fig.1, 21a and 22a), transmitting said image through a fiber optic face plate (fig.1) said fiber optic face plate comprising a first side having a first surface lying in the first image plane (21a), and a second side having a second surface lying in a second image plane (see the other end of 1 in fig.1), and projecting the image from the second surface (fig.1), wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes (21a and 22a) each first part image plane (21a and 22a) associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate and the first part surfaces (21a and 22) of the first side of the fiber optic face plate are arranged in different surface planes (see fig.1), that are not parallel with the second image plane of the second surface (see the arrangement of planes of 21 and 22a) but does not disclose wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes each first part image plane associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate, and the fiber optic faceplate is arranged to transfers at least parts of the images from the plurality of first part surfaces to mutually overlapping positions in a common second surface or wherein: the first image plane comprises a plurality of first part image planes each first part image plane associated with an individual first part surface of the first side of the fiber optic face plate, the second image plane comprises a plurality of second part image planes each second part image plane associated with an individual second part surface of the second side of the fiber optic face plate, and for each position of the first surface, incident light is divided and divergently transmitted to a plurality of second part surfaces structurally arranged and functionally operated as in claims 21 or 27. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 06/26/2025 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERRY L. BROOKS whose telephone number is (571)270-5711. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 5712722303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERRY L BROOKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 03, 2022
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 26, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601964
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585178
LIGHT SOURCE DEVICE AND PROJECTION DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585179
WAVELENGTH CONVERSION APPARATUS, LIGHT SOURCE APPARATUS, AND PROJECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578634
LIGHT SOURCE CONTROL METHOD FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578558
IMAGING LENS MODULE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month