Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/052,996

FLUORINE-CONTAINING ETHER COMPOUND, FLUORINE-CONTAINING ETHER COMPOSITION, COATING LIQUID, HIGH OXYGEN SOLUBILITY LIQUID, AND ARTICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 07, 2022
Examiner
MCCULLEY, MEGAN CASSANDRA
Art Unit
1767
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Agc Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
424 granted / 727 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 727 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tonelli et al. (EP 0 870 778). Regarding claim 1: Tonelli et al. teaches a fluorine containing ether compound having the formula: PNG media_image1.png 42 360 media_image1.png Greyscale (abstract). This compound reads on claimed formula (1), where the Rf of Tonelli et al. is the claimed A1/a fluoroalkyl group of 1-3 carbon atoms (abstract). The (CF2CF2O)m(CF2O)n group of Tonelli et al. read on the claimed (Rf12)m2-O-(Rf11O)m1 groups since Rf12 and Rf11 are fluoroalkylene groups having a carbon number of 1-6. The group Aq-Tp of Tonelli et al. reads on the claimed Q1 in embodiment 56 on page 10, where -AT can be PNG media_image2.png 94 414 media_image2.png Greyscale , which reads on the definition of claimed Q1. The claimed m2 can be zero since the first group Rf is connected to an oxygen, or it can be 1 as in the group (CF2CF2O). Claimed m1 can be 1, or up to m + n in Tonelli et al., where m/n is 0.2-5 (abstract), and claimed n1 is 1. These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. While Tonelli et al. teaches other embodiments that do not read on the claimed structure, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to select embodiment 56 of Tonelli et al. and would have been motivated to do so since embodiment 56 is a disclosed example of a solution to the problem facing Tonelli et al., namely improving surface properties of films. Regarding claim 2: The claimed m2 can be zero since the first group Rf is connected to an oxygen. Regarding claim 4: Tonelli et al. teaches the number average molecular weight is 400-5000 (pg. 2 lines 35-40), which is the same as weight average molecular weight when the polydispersity is 1. Regarding claim 5: While it is not explicitly clear if Tonelli et al. teaches the fluorine containing ether compounds disclosed can be used together, it is prima facie obvious to combine two compositions each of which is taught by the prior art to be useful for the same purpose in order to form a third composition to be used for the very same purpose (MPEP 2144.06 I). Regarding claims 6 and 7: Tonelli et al. teaches the compound mixed with solvents and made into a product (pg. 11 lines 35-45) and used for a coating (pg. 2 lines 15-20). Regarding claims 9 and 10: Tonelli et al. teaches coating a substrate with the claimed compound (pg. 2 lines 15-20). Claims 1-3 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gries (EP 0 525 444), citing the original document and the English language machine translation provided. Regarding claim 1: Gries teaches PNG media_image3.png 36 216 media_image3.png Greyscale (abstract), where R1 is a cyclic fluoroalkyl radical or a straight or branched chain fluoroalkyl radical (abstract of the translation), which overlaps the claimed formula (1). In the case where the claimed ranges overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art, a prima facie case of obviousness exists (MPEP 2144.05 I). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention a person having ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to use the overlapping ranges of the moieties in the structure and would have been motivated to do so since the compound is a disclosed solution to the problem facing Gries Regarding claim 2: The claimed m2 can be zero since the first atom after Rf is O. Regarding claim 3: Gries teaches that Rf can be a cyclic fluoroalkyl radical (translation abstract), the term “alkyl” meaning the carbocycle is aliphatic. Regarding claim 8: Gries teaches the compound is in a liquid medium (pg. 5 claim 5 of the translation). The property of “high oxygen solubility liquid” is an arbitrarily broad term that can apply to any number of oxygen solubility levels. Further, since Gries teaches an overlapping structure, the properties of the chemical composition and its properties are inseparable (MPEP 2112.01 II). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Megan McCulley whose telephone number is (571)270-3292. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at 571-272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MEGAN MCCULLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600814
Electric Insulation Material and/or Impregnation Resin for a Wrapping Tape Insulation for a Medium- and/or High-Voltage Machine
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12583965
POLYMERIZATIONS IN SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE, PRODUCTS OF SAME, AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577346
BENZOXAZINE COMPOUND-CONTAINING COMPOSITION, CURABLE RESIN COMPOSITION, AND CURED PRODUCT THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12540254
Epoxy Compositions and Methods of Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12540249
CATIONIC ELECTRODEPOSITION COATING COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+16.6%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 727 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month