Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/056,408

COIL COMPONENT

Final Rejection §103§112
Filed
Nov 17, 2022
Priority
Dec 01, 2021 — JP 2021-195290
Examiner
LIAN, MANG TIN BIK
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
933 granted / 1330 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
1401
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
91.7%
+51.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1330 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9, 11-16, 18 and 20-23 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. The amendment filed on 03/12/2026 overcomes the 35 USC 102 rejection in the Office action dated 12/15/2025. However, the combination of FIGs. 1A and FIG. 1B of Komaya sufficiently teaches all the limitations of claim 1 as amended. Accordingly, the coil component as currently claimed is obvious over FIGs. 1A and FIG. 1B. Since the amendment changes the scope of the claim and requires the combination of FIG. 1B to FIG. 1A, it’s proper to make this Office action Final. The drawings objection made in the Office action dated 12/15/2025 is hereby withdrawn as a result of the explanation made in the reply filed 03/12/2026. However, a new drawings objection is made based on the amended limitations. Similarly, the 35 USC 112(b) rejection is withdrawn as a result of the explanation made. However, the new 112(a) and 112(b) rejections are based on the newly added limitations. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the “a convex first spacer portion in contact with the top surface is in first corner regions…the first spacer portion includes two portions dented from a side of the lower main surface along a direction parallel to the axial direction and located at both ends of the top plate in the width direction” as recited in claim 21 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 21 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding claim 21, the originally filed specification does not disclose “a convex first spacer portion in contact with the top surface is in first corner regions…the first spacer portion includes two portions dented from a side of the lower main surface along a direction parallel to the axial direction and located at both ends of the top plate in the width direction” as recited in the newly added claim. Claim 23 is rejected as being dependent on claim 21. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 21 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 21, it’s not clear what’s intended by “a convex first spacer portion in contact with the top surface is in first corner regions…the first spacer portion includes two portions dented from a side of the lower main surface along a direction parallel to the axial direction and located at both ends of the top plate in the width direction” as recited in the newly added claim. As shown in FIG. 4 of the present invention, which is the elected species as stated in the reply dated 10/27/2025, the convex first spacer portion 21 is not in the corner regions 14c1 and 14c2 (annotated FIG. 4 below). There is a T-shaped recessed portion 14r next to the convex spacer portion 21, and the recessed portion extends continuously from corner 14c1 to corner 14c2 of the side surface 24. This T-shaped recessed portion 14c does not appear to be part of the “convex firs spacer portion” as convex by definition is opposite of recessed portion 14c or “dented” two portions as claimed. Therefore, it is not clear what’s intended by “two portions dented” as claimed. As stated above, the originally filed specification does not have any explanation of this newly added limitation. PNG media_image1.png 350 515 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 23 is rejected as being dependent on claim 21. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9, 11-16, 18 and 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Komaya et al. (U.S. PG. Pub. No. 2018/0130597 A1). With respect to claim 1, Komaya et al., hereinafter referred to as “Komaya,” teaches a coil component 1 (FIG. 1A) comprising: a core 10 including a winding core portion 12 extending in an axial direction (X axis direction), a first flange portion (left or right flange 14a), and a second flange portion (the other of left or right flange 14a), the first flange portion and the second flange portion being at both end portions (end portions in X axis direction) in the axial direction of the winding core portion, and the core including a first magnetic material (“materials” (para. [0060]) (para. [0042]); a top plate 20 having a lower main surface 20a (annotated FIG. 1A) and an upper main surface 20b that face away from each other, the top plate including a second magnetic material (“materials” para. [0060]) (para. [0047]); and at least one wire 31 or 32 wound around the winding core portion (para. [0044]), wherein each of the first flange portion and the second flange portion has a mounting surface 14a4 facing a mounting board 80 in a mounted state and a top surface 14a3 facing away from the mounting surface (paras. [0048] and [0050]), the top plate is fixed to the core via an adhesive (the top plate would need to be adhered to the flange to operate, and para. [0097] also discloses the top late “adhered or fixed” to the flange) with the lower main surface facing the top surface of the first flange portion and the top surface of the second flange portion, a convex first spacer portion 20c in contact with the top surface is in part of a region (central region) of the lower main surface, the region facing the first flange portion (para. [0048]), a convex second spacer portion (spacer portion similar to spacer portion 20c on opposite side) in contact with the top surface is in part of a region (central region) of the lower main surface, the region facing the second flange portion (para. [0048]), a convex stage portion (portion around middle of the lower main surface 20a) is in a region (region around middle of the lower main surface 20a) of the lower main surface, the region facing the winding core portion, and the first spacer portion and the second spacer portion are connected to each other via the stage portion (para. [0048]). PNG media_image2.png 505 682 media_image2.png Greyscale Komaya does not expressly teach, in the embodiment of FIG. 1A, wherein each of the first spacer portion and the second spacer portion is divided into two portions in the width direction to form a gap between the two portions in the width direction. However, Momaya teaches, in the embodiment of FIG. 1B, a coil component 1, wherein each of the first spacer portion (spacer 20aa and 20ab of the left side, annotated FIG. 1B) and the second spacer portion (spacer 20aa and 20ab of the right side) is divided into two portions 20aa and 20ab in the width direction (Y axis direction) to form a gap (gap formed by one or both of the two grooves between the spacers) between the two portions in the width direction. PNG media_image3.png 489 663 media_image3.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the two portions of the respective first and second spacer portions as taught by the embodiment of FIG. 1B of Komaya to the coil component of the embodiment of FIG. 1A of Komaya to move the connection between the electrode and the winding wire to the center so that the manufacturing of the flange is simplified (paras. [0084] and [0085]). With respect to claim 2, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claim 1, wherein a dimension (width in Y axis direction) in a width direction (Y axis direction) of the stage portion is larger than a dimension (width in Y axis direction) in the width direction of the first spacer portion and a dimension (width in Y axis direction) in the width direction of the second spacer portion, the width direction being a direction in which the lower main surface extends and which is orthogonal to the axial direction (para. [0048]). With respect to claims 3 and 14, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 2, respectively, wherein a dimension (length in X axis direction) in the longitudinal direction of a portion of the stage portion facing the winding core portion is smaller than a dimension (length in X axis direction) in the longitudinal direction of the winding core portion, and the stage portion is away from the first flange portion and the second flange portion, the longitudinal direction being parallel to the axial direction (para. [0048]). With respect to claim 4, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claim 3, wherein a dimension (height in Z axis direction) in a height direction (Z axis direction) of the stage portion measured from the lower main surface is equal to dimensions in the height direction of the first spacer portion and the second spacer portion that are measured from the lower main surface (para. [0048]). With respect to claims 6 and 15, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 2, respectively. Komaya does not expressly teach, in the embodiment of FIG. 1A, the width direction is a direction in which the lower main surface extends and which is orthogonal to the axial direction. However, Momaya teaches, in the embodiment of FIG. 1B, a coil component 1, wherein the width direction is a direction in which the lower main surface (lower surface) extends and which is orthogonal to the axial direction (X axis direction) (para. [0084]). With respect to claims 7 and 16, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 2, respectively, wherein the lower main surface has a side (lower surface of cutout part 21) extending in the longitudinal direction, the longitudinal direction being parallel to the axial direction, and the first spacer portion and the second spacer portion are in contact with the side extending in the longitudinal direction (para. [0048]). With respect to claims 9 and 18, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 2, respectively. Komaya does not expressly teach, in the embodiment of FIG. 1A, both edges in the width direction of the top surface of the first flange portion are present at positions facing intermediate portions in the width direction of the first spacer portion, and both edges in the width direction of the top surface of the second flange portion are present at positions facing intermediate portions in the width direction of the second spacer portion, the width direction being a direction in which the lower main surface extends and which is orthogonal to the axial direction. However, Momaya teaches, in the embodiment of FIG. 1B, a coil component 1, wherein both edges (ridges between top surface and side surfaces) in the width direction (Y axis direction) of the top surface (upper surface) of the first flange portion 14a are present at positions facing intermediate portions (portions facing the edges) in the width direction of the first spacer portion, and both edges (ridges between top surface and side surfaces) in the width direction of the top surface (upper surface) of the second flange portion 14a are present at positions facing intermediate portions in the width direction of the second spacer portion, the width direction being a direction in which the lower main surface extends and which is orthogonal to the axial direction (X axis direction) (para. [0084]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the edges facing intermediate portions of the first and second spacer portions as taught by the embodiment of FIG. 1B of Komaya to the coil component of the embodiment of FIG. 1A of Komaya to move the connection between the electrode and the winding wire to the center so that the manufacturing of the flange is simplified (paras. [0084] and [0085]). With respect to claims 11 and 20, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 2, respectively, wherein the first spacer portion faces a region (region close to inner wall of the first flange portion) of the top surface of the first flange portion , the region being close to the winding core portion, and the second spacer portion faces a region (region close to inner wall of the second flange portion) of the top surface of the second flange portion, the region being close to the winding core portion (para. [0048]). With respect to claim 12, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claim 1, wherein rising surfaces (slope surface from cutout part 21 to the lower main surface) of peripheral edges of the first spacer portion, the second spacer portion, and the stage portion from the lower main surface are inclined surfaces (para. [0048]). With respect to claim 13, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claim 1, further comprising: a terminal electrode 40 and 50 on the mounting surface, wherein the wire is connected to the terminal electrode on a side (upper side) of the mounting surface (paras. [0046] and [52]). With respect to claim 21, Komaya teaches a coil component 1 (FIG. 1A) comprising: a core 10 including a winding core portion 12 extending in an axial direction (X axis direction), a first flange portion (left or right flange 14a), and a second flange portion (the other of left or right flange 14a), the first flange portion and the second flange portion being at both end portions (end portions in X axis direction) in the axial direction of the winding core portion, and the core including a first magnetic material (“magnetic materials” (para. [0062]) (para. [0042]); a top plate 20 having a lower main surface 20a (annotated FIG. 1A) and an upper main surface 20b that face away from each other, the top plate including a second magnetic material (“magnetic materials” para. [0062]) (para. [0047]); and at least one wire 31 or 32 wound around the winding core portion (para. [0044]), wherein each of the first flange portion and the second flange portion has a mounting surface 14a4 facing a mounting board 80 in a mounted state and a top surface 14a3 facing away from the mounting surface (paras. [0048] and [0050]), the top plate is fixed to the core via an adhesive (the top plate would need to be adhered to the flange to operate, and para. [0097] also discloses the top plate “adhered or fixed” to the flange) with the lower main surface facing the top surface of the first flange portion and the top surface of the second flange portion, a convex first spacer portion 20c in contact with the top surface is in a central region of the lower main surface, the first corner regions facing the first flange portion, a convex second spacer portion (spacer portion similar to spacer portion 20c on opposite side) in contact with the top surface is in part of a region (central region) of the lower main surface, the region facing the second flange portion (para. [0048]), a convex stage portion (portion around middle of the lower main surface 20a) is in a region (region around middle of the lower main surface 20a) of the lower main surface, the region facing the winding core portion (para. [0048]), and the first spacer portion and the second spacer portion are connected to each other via the stage portion(para. [0048]). Komaya does not expressly teach, in the embodiment of FIG. 1A, wherein a convex first spacer portion in contact with the top surface is in first corner regions, and wherein the first spacer portion includes two portions dented from a side of the lower main surface along a direction parallel to the axial direction and located at both ends of the top plate in the width direction. However, best understood in view of 35 USC 112(b) rejection, Momaya teaches, in the embodiment of FIG. 1B, a coil component 1, wherein a convex first spacer portion 20aa and 20ab (annotated FIG. 6) in contact with the top surface is in first corner regions (front and back end regions in Y axis direction on the right side in X axis direction), and wherein the first spacer portion 20aa and 20ab includes two portions 20aa and 20ab dented from a side (left and right side in X axis direction) of the lower main surface along a direction parallel to the axial direction and located at both ends of the top plate in the width direction (Y axis direction). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have the convex first spacer and the dented portions as taught by the embodiment of FIG. 1B of Komaya to the coil component of the embodiment of FIG. 1A of Komaya to move the connection between the electrode and the winding wire to the center so that the manufacturing of the flange is simplified (paras. [0084] and [0085]). With respect to claims 22 and 23, Komaya teaches the coil component according to Claims 1 and 21, respectively, wherein the lower main surface extends from a first side (front side) of the top plate to a second side (back side) of the top plate along the width direction (para. [0048]). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANGTIN LIAN whose telephone number is (571)270-5729. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 0800-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Shawki S. Ismail can be reached at 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG TIN BIK LIAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 17, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §103, §112
Dec 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Mar 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 12, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112
Jul 14, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683063
INDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665118
INDUCTOR COMPONENT
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12633450
INTEGRATED QUAD-CORE TRANSFORMER WITH ASYMMETRIC GAP DISTRIBUTION FOR MAGNETIC FLUX BALANCING
5y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12626851
HIGH FREQUENCY INTEGRATED PLANAR MAGNETICS FOR A BIDIRECTIONAL AC TO DC CLLC RESONANT CONVERTER
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12620521
Coil and Method for Producing A Coil
4y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+26.4%)
2y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1330 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month