Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/056,836

GLP-1R MODULATING COMPOUNDS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2022
Examiner
PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R
Art Unit
2178
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ascletis Bioscience Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
41%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5y 4m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 41% of resolved cases
41%
Career Allow Rate
96 granted / 232 resolved
-13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
5y 4m
Avg Prosecution
142 currently pending
Career history
374
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.5%
+3.5% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 232 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-28, filed November 18, 2022 with a domestic benefit date of June 17, 2022, are pending in the application and are objected or rejected to for the reasons set forth below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 18, 2022 were in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement was considered by the examiner. A signed copy of each form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of the invention of group I, claims 1-28, in the reply filed on December 26, 2024 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground there is no undue burden on the examiner in this case. Applicants submit that in accordance with Section 803 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, there is no prohibition against claiming a reasonable number of species and therefore there should be no undue burden on the Examiner. This is found unpersuasive because the invention of group I (claims 1-28) classified in C07D405/14 is drawn to a compound of formula I-A-1, (product) while the invention of group II (claim 29) classified in C07D401/10 is drawn to a process of use. Furthermore, the limitations of formula of I-A-1 recite a diverse selection of functional groups, chemical bonding and structural compositions with mutually exclusive characteristics for each identified species. Searching these inventions and species together would require different search queries, databases, and classifications. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim 29 is withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on December 26, 2024. Claims 3-4, 6-7, 9-10, and 26 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a non-elected species. Claims 1-2, 5, 8, 11-25, 27 and 28 read on the elected species and are under current examination in the instant application. In accordance with the MPEP 803.02, if upon examination of the elected species, no prior art is found that would anticipate or render obvious the instant invention based on the elected species, the search of the Markush-type claim will be extended. If prior art is then found that anticipates or renders obvious the non-elected species, the Markush-type claim will be rejected. It should be noted that the prior art search will not be extended unnecessarily to cover all non-elected species. Should Applicant overcome the rejection by amending the claim, the amended claim will be reexamined. The prior art search will be extended to the extent necessary to determine patentability of the Markush-type claim. In the event prior art is found during reexamination that renders obvious or anticipates the amended Markush-type claim, the claim will be rejected and the action made final. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 27 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 5, 8, 11-13 and 24-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by CAplus Registry Number: RN 2230201-35-9. [Database Registry Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, Accession No. RN 2230201-35-9, Entered STN: 09 Jul 2018]. PNG media_image1.png 563 1045 media_image1.png Greyscale RN 2230201-35-9 anticipates the instant claims wherein R2 is methyl, X is CH, R3’ is C(O)R3a wherein R3a is methyl, R3 is H, V is CH2 wherein C(R6b)-C(R6c) and R6b R6c are H, B is piperidine, A is pyridine, Y is O, R5a and R5b are H and R1 is phenol. PNG media_image2.png 222 633 media_image2.png Greyscale (Compound I-A-1 of the instant application) Registry number 2230201-35-9 is available as prior art as of 09 Jul 2018, the day it was indexed into the CAplus database. Claims 1, 15-23 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CAplus Registry Number: RN 1066991-68-1. [Database Registry Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, Accession No. RN 1066991-68-1, Entered STN: 27 Oct 2008]. PNG media_image3.png 711 890 media_image3.png Greyscale RN 1066991-68-1 anticipates the instant claims wherein X is CH, R3’ is H, R3 is H, V is CH2 wherein the R6b R6c of C(R6b)(R6c) are H, ring B is piperidine, ring A is pyrimidine substituted with Z1a wherein Z1a is aryl substituted with Z1b and Z1b is O-methyl, Y is S, R5a and R5b are H, and R1 is alkyl substituted alkoxy. Regarding the compositions of claim 28, comprising the anticipatory compounds and an excipient, the Registry entry for Registry no. 1066991-68-1 discloses a mass solubility of 0.00069 g/L, in unbuffered water at pH 7.39. The Registry entries for registry no. 2230201-35-9 discloses a mass solubility of 0.0013 g/L, in unbuffered water at pH 7.49 and the registry entry for registry no. 2403765-36-4 discloses a mass solubility of 0.0019 g/L, in unbuffered water at pH 6.19.These teachings of water anticipates the claimed composition, wherein the compounds are present with an excipient (i.e., water). Claims 1, and 13-14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by CAplus Registry Number: RN 2403765-36-4. [Database Registry Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio, Accession No. RN 2403765-36-4, Entered STN: 09 Jan 2020]. PNG media_image4.png 821 879 media_image4.png Greyscale RN 2403765-36-4 anticipates the instant claims wherein X is CH, R3’ is C(O)-OR3a wherein R3a is H, R3 is H, R2 is 2-ethyloxetane ( PNG media_image5.png 138 135 media_image5.png Greyscale ), V is CH2, ring B is piperidine, ring A is pyridine, Y is O, R5a and R5b are H, R1 is phenyl substituted with 2 Z1 wherein each Z1 is F and CN. See MPEP 2128 II: ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS AS PRIOR ART Status as a "Printed Publication" An electronic publication, including an on-line database or Internet publication, is considered to be a “printed publication” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) provided the publication was accessible to persons concerned with the art to which the document relates. See In re Wyer, 655 F.2d 221, 227, 210 USPQ 790, 795 (CCPA 1981) Since this date represents the date that each compound entered the CAPlus database on STN, this represents the date that each compound was made accessible to the public. The aforementioned compounds anticipate the instantly claimed compounds: It is further noted that for the purposes of determining if a reference is a “printed publication” for the purposes of 102(b), MPEP 2128 I states the following: “A reference is proven to be a "printed publication" "upon a satisfactory showing that such document has been disseminated or otherwise made available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence, can locate it." In re Wyer, 655 F.2d 221, 210 USPQ 790 (CCPA 1981) (quoting I.C.E. Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 250 F. Supp. 738, 743, 148 USPQ 537, 540 (SDNY 1966)) ("We agree that ‘printed publication’ should be approached as a unitary concept.” Where “prior art disclosures…on an on-line database are considered to be publicly available as of the date the item was publicly posted.” Since each of the database entries above lists the date that each compound was entered into the on-line database, the compounds were made publicly available as of that date in each citation, and the claims are anticipated. Conclusion/Correspondence All claims are rejected, no claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERNESTO VALLE JR whose telephone number is (703)756-5356. The examiner can normally be reached 0730-1700 M-F EST, 1st Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Adam C Milligan can be reached on 571-270-7674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /E.V./ Examiner, Art Unit 1623 /ADAM C MILLIGAN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2022
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 06, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12247323
Continuous Preparation Method of Cellulose Fibers
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 11, 2025
Patent 9271028
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DECODING A DATA STREAM IN AUDIO VIDEO STREAMING SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 23, 2016
Patent 8239350
DATE AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 07, 2012
Patent 8229899
REMOTE ACCESS AGENT FOR CACHING IN A SAN FILE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 24, 2012
Patent 8209280
EXPOSING MULTIDIMENSONAL CALCULATIONS THROUGH A RELATIONAL DATABASE SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 26, 2012
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
41%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (+23.9%)
5y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 232 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month