Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/056,860

Process for manufacturing and bonding a shoe rubber outsole

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 18, 2022
Examiner
SMITH JR., JIMMY R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
282 granted / 437 resolved
-0.5% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
483
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.6%
+2.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
35.1%
-4.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 437 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-10 in the reply filed on 07/08/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 11-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/08/2025. Claim Objections The following claim(s) are objected to because of these informalities: In claim 10, line 3, “adhesive” should read “adhesive composition”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 11 recites “a water-based polyurethane dispersion”. It is unclear whether this polyurethane dispersion is the same as the one recited earlier in the claim on lines 6-7 or not. For the purpose of examination, claim 1, line 11 reads on "the heat and pressure stable water-based polyurethane dispersion". Dependent claims fall herewith. Claim 2, lines 4-5 recite "a shoe rubber outsole". It is unclear whether this outsole is the same as the one recited in parent claim 1. For the purpose of examination, claim 2 reads on "the shoe rubber outsole". Claim 4, line 5 recites "the polyisocyanate". This term is not previously used in this claim or the parent claim and does not have proper antecedent basis. It is noted that the claims filed prior to the preliminary amendment recited a polyisocyanate earlier in the claim as one component of the reaction mixture. For the purpose of examination, claim 4, line 3 reads on "a reaction mixture comprising a polyester polyol and a polyisocyanate", thus providing antecedent basis for the later recitation on line 5. Claim 4, lines 7-8 recites "a molar excess of the hydroxyl group than the isocyanate". The terms hydroxyl group and isocyanate are not previously used in this claim or the parent claim and do not have proper antecedent basis. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the claim requires a molar excess of hydroxyl group in comparison to the amount of isocyanate. For the purpose of examination and in view of para. 0036 in the PG Pub for the instant disclosure, claim 4, lines 7-8 read on "a molar excess of a polyisocyanate relative to the molar ratio of isocyanate and hydroxyl groups". Examiner also suggests Applicant verify this suggestion is consistent with the intent of the claim or whether a different correction is needed, being mindful to avoid introduction of new matter into the claim. Claim 10, line 3 recites "the step (3)". It is unclear whether step (3) recited in parent claim 9 or step (3) in parent claim 1 is being referenced. For the purpose of examination, claim 10 reads on "the step (3) of attaching the activated shoe rubber outsole to the shoe". Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 3, and 5-9 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2 and 4 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claim 10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, and with correction for the claim objection, as set forth in this Office action Regarding claim 1, the prior art of record does not teach, suggest, or render obvious a process for manufacturing a shoe rubber outsole, comprising: applying an adhesive composition to an uncured rubber material, wherein said adhesive composition comprises a heat and pressure stable water-based polyurethane dispersion; wherein the adhesive composition comprises, based on the total weight of the composition: 85 to 99.9 wt.% of the heat and pressure stable water-based polyurethane dispersion; 0.1 to 10 wt.% of at least one modified polyolefin based adhesion promoter; 0 to 0.1 wt.% of at least one optical brightener; 0 to 1 wt.% of at least one hydrophobically modified ethylene oxide-urethane block copolymer (HEUR) thickener; in combination with the other limitations in the claim. Huh (US PG Pub 2018/0289104), Natori (US PG Pub 2013/0183520), and Yano (US PG Pub 2014/0137435) are the closest prior art of record. None of these references teaches or suggests the combination of features listed above for claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIM R SMITH whose telephone number is (303)297-4318. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9-6 MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached on 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIMMY R SMITH JR./Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600091
OPTICAL SHAPING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598895
DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12570043
POWDER BED FUSION RECOATER ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570359
VEHICLE PILLAR REINFORCEMENT USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564987
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CURING FORMABLE MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 437 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month