Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/057,348

Remote Play System for an Arcade Machine

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 21, 2022
Examiner
RENWICK, REGINALD A
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allow Rate
499 granted / 704 resolved
+0.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
745
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 704 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Reopening of Prosecution The previous rejection has been withdrawn and a new non-final rejection has been provided below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wells (U.S. PGPUB 2003/0064805) in view of Elmqvst (U.S. PGPUB 2018/0218564). Re claim 1: Wells discloses a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software for enabling remote play, comprising: a local cabinet having a local display, local speakers & amplifier, local input devices, local computer, and local power supplies contained within it and/or mounted to it (see Fig, 2, object 2: a gaming machine having each of the components listed) a local computer contained within local cabinet, having local Internet connection, local content software, and local thin-client software having network linkage to a remote computer and server-side computer and local payment-capture mechanism (see Fig. 2 and paragraph [0070]: the game machine has a processor and an internet connection for viewing material from the world wide web. Additionally, the game machine presents a game of chance on the remote display, i.e. remote thin-client software, see paragraph [0020]); a local payment-capture mechanism having network linkage to local computer (see paragraph [0070]: bill and coin accepters) a remote thin-client software having real-time interactive streaming function than can run on any number of disparate remote computers, each having remote display, remote input devices, and network linkage to local computer and server-side computer and remote payment-capture mechanism (see [0022]: the game machine performs “4) sending operating instructions to the wireless game player where the operating instructions are used by the wireless game player to present the game outcome for the game of chance” wherein the “gaming machine may support simultaneously a plurality of remote gaming devices for game play and not just a single remote gaming device. Finally, gaming machine may be used that simultaneously provide both remote game play and local game play.” Thus, the gaming machine supports a multitude of remote players, wherein each remote players have the ability to make wagers); Although, Wells discloses a game server, cashless server, and payout server, Wells fails to disclose a server-side computer, having server-side database, server-side payment-capture mechanism, server-side adjustable software algorithm to determine payout, and server-side software having server-side payment capture mechanism and network linkage to local computer and remote computer. Each of the servers listed have the ability perform the limitation, however Wells lacks teaching them in one server. Elmqvist teaches a game server that captures payments in the form of wagers and determines payouts based on the wager (see paragraph [0035]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to modify the system of Wells with the game server of Elmqvist for alleviating the bandwidth on the local devices of Wells by giving some tasks to a game server. Re claim 2: Wells discloses a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined firs player slot (see [0058] “gaming machine may support simultaneously a plurality of remote gaming devices for game play and not just a single remote gaming device. Finally, gaming machine may be used that simultaneously provide both remote game play and local game play.”). Re claim 3: Wells discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined second-player slot (see [0058] “gaming machine may support simultaneously a plurality of remote gaming devices for game play and not just a single remote gaming device. Finally, gaming machine may be used that simultaneously provide both remote game play and local game play.”) Re claim 4: Wells discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined sequence of player slots (see paragraph [0058]). Re claim 6: Wells discloses a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global-to-local software- defined input assignment map (a defined input assignment map is inherent to the real-time streaming software as Wells as a map is necessary to translate game input from the remote gaming device to the software at the gaming machine). Re claim 8: Wells discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined disconnect input devices mechanism (see paragraph [0045]: “When the gaming machine detects that the wireless game player is in a restricted area, it may discontinue communications with the wireless game player.”). Re claim 9: Wells discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global-to-content software- defined input assignment bridge (it is inherent, that Wells performs these functions as inputted information from Wells is sent and interacts with the gaming device. Thus, when a user presses a specific button on their wireless device, it performs an operation within the game hosted on the gaming device) Re claim 10: Wells discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a local content software intended inputs (see paragraph [0022]: the game can be played simultaneously at the local gaming device, wherein said gaming device has its own inputs for local gaming device content). Claim(s) 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wells in view of Elmqvst in further view of Gupta (U.S. PGPUB 2022/0036692). Re claims 5: Wells fails to discloses with respect to a local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined maximum number of player slots. However, Gupta teaches a mobile game wagering server wherein mobile devices are connected to a game network, wherein a maximum number of mobile devices are allowed to be connected (see paragraph [0102]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed, to modify the the system of Wells a maximum number of slots feature as taught by Gupta, for the purpose of limiting the bandwidth burden on the hosting local computer. Re claim 7. Wells fails to disclose with respect to the local arcade machine having real-time interactive streaming software according to claim 1, wherein the real-time interactive streaming software comprises a global software-defined maximum number of local and remote thin-client instances. However, Gupta teaches a mobile game wagering server wherein mobile devices are connected to a game network, wherein a maximum number of mobile devices are allowed to be connected (see paragraph [0102]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed, to modify the system of Wells a maximum number of slots feature as taught by Gupta, for the purpose of limiting the bandwidth burden on the hosting local computer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD A RENWICK whose telephone number is (571)270-1913. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. REGINALD A. RENWICK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3714 /REGINALD A RENWICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 21, 2022
Application Filed
Nov 16, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 05, 2024
Response Filed
May 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599843
GAMEPLAY RECORDING VIDEO CREATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599832
AUTOMATIC UMPIRING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594491
THUMBSTICK ASSEMBLY WITH ADJUSTABLE DAMPING AND GAMEPAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576307
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR GENERATING SPORTS ANALYTICS WITH A MOBILE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12569773
AUTOMATED VIDEO GAME TEST BED AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+9.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 704 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month