Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/059,976

TECHNIQUES TO FACILITATE RATE MATCHING AND CSI CONFIGURATIONS FOR RATE-SPLITTING MU-MIMO COMMUNICATIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Examiner
NGUYEN, THUONG
Art Unit
2416
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
450 granted / 660 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
720
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
84.4%
+44.4% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 660 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This action is responsive to the RCE filed on 1/15/26. Claim(s) 1, 4-13, 16, 19-36 is/are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, 9-13, 16, 19-20, 24-27, 31 & 35-36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hao, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2021/0126739 A1 in view of Sahin, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2014/0146756 A1, and further in view of Ma, US 2021/0258897 A1. As to claim 1, Hao teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a user equipment (UE), comprising: a memory; and at least one processor coupled to the memory and, based at least in part on information stored in the memory, the at least one processor is configured to: receive multiple user-multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO) communication (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0050] Thus, performance of MU-MIMO) that includes the common codeword that is common to multiple UEs and the private codeword for the UE, wherein the common rate matching information for the common codeword for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication and UE-specific rate matching information for the private codeword of the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; page 10, paragraph 97 & 101; i.e., [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE based at least in part on such information. rate matching or decoding of such signals. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword; [0097] As shown by reference number 735, the UE 120 may perform rate matching or decoding of the communication. For example, the UE 120 may determine the mapping of codewords to layers. the UE 120 is to rate match and/or decode. Additionally, or alternatively, the UE 120 may determine rates of first layers and/or second layers); and decode the common codeword of the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication based on the first rate matching indicated by the common rate matching information (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0050] Thus, performance of MU-MIMO) that includes the common codeword that is common to multiple UEs and the private codeword for the UE, wherein the common rate matching information for the common codeword for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication and UE-specific rate matching information for the private codeword of the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; page 10, paragraph 97 & 101; i.e., [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0051] rate matching or decoding of such signals. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword; [0097] As shown by reference number 735, the UE 120 may perform rate matching or decoding of the communication. For example, the UE 120 may determine the mapping of codewords to layers. the UE 120 is to rate match and/or decode. Additionally, or alternatively, the UE 120 may determine rates of first layers and/or second layers); and decode the private codeword of the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication based on the first rate matching by the UE-specific rate matching information (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0050] Thus, performance of MU-MIMO) that includes the common codeword that is common to multiple UEs and the private codeword for the UE, wherein the common rate matching information for the common codeword for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication and UE-specific rate matching information for the private codeword of the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; page 10, paragraph 97 & 101; i.e., [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0051] rate matching or decoding of such signals. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword; [0097] As shown by reference number 735, the UE 120 may perform rate matching or decoding of the communication. For example, the UE 120 may determine the mapping of codewords to layers. the UE 120 is to rate match and/or decode. Additionally, or alternatively, the UE 120 may determine rates of first layers and/or second layers). But Hao failed to teach the claim limitation wherein receive separate rate matching information for a common codeword and a private codeword for a rate-splitting, wherein the separate rate matching information includes common rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern for the common codeword for the rate-splitting and UE-specific rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern for the private codeword of the rate-splitting; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the common rate matching information; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the UE-specific rate matching information. However, Sahin teaches the limitation wherein receive separate rate matching information for a common codeword and a private codeword for a rate-splitting, wherein the separate rate matching information includes common rate matching information for the common codeword for the rate-splitting and UE-specific rate matching information for the private codeword of the rate-splitting (Sahin, page 2, paragraph 14-15; page 3, paragraph 32; i.e., [0014] private message splitting rates, respectively, and the common and private precoder weights, respectively; [0032] The first transmitter splits the first message into a first common part and a first private part. The first transmitter then precodes the first common part using a first common rate, and precodes the first private part using the first private rate). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao to substitute sharing available resource from Sahin for power from Hao to improved mobile broadband communication as compared to existing radio access technology (RAT) (Sahin, page 1, paragraph 3). However, Ma teaches the limitation wherein common rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; UE-specific rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the common rate matching information; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the UE-specific rate matching information (Ma, page 8, paragraph 90-96; i.e., [0090] a common SIB message for all N beams of a satellite. The SIB message may include N rate matching configurations ( one rate match configuration for each of the N beams), wherein each configuration of the N rate matching configurations defines one beam-specific rate matching pattern; [0094] In an aspect, a beam-specific SIB message may be transmitted. The SIB message may include the rate matching configuration associated with only the one beam. In this case, the rate matching configuration; [0096] The RateMatchPattern IE may be used to configure one rate matching pattern for PDSCH. In an aspect, for each beam identified by an SSB index, a pair of bitmaps ( e.g., bitmaps IE of the RateMatchPattern IE) may be used to specify the rate match regions. The bitmaps IE may indicate rate matching patterns). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao to substitute transmission resources from Ma for power from Hao to improving spectral efficiency, lowering costs, improving services (Ma, page 1, paragraph 4). As to claim 4, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein to receive the common rate matching information, the at least one processor is configured to: receive one or more rate matching configurations (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0006] performing rate matching or decoding based at least in part on the information identifying the mapping; [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE based at least in part on such information. rate matching or decoding of such signals); and receive an indication of a common rate matching configuration from the one or more rate matching configurations previously received by the UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; i.e., [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE based at least in part on such information. Thus, flexibility and efficiency of provision of signals including first parts and second parts is improved by providing for signaling or configuration of rate matching or decoding of such signals). As to claim 5, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the common rate matching information is comprised in one or more of a radio resource control (RRC) message, a medium access control-control element (MAC-CE), or downlink control information (DCI) (Hao, page 8, paragraph 88; i.e., [0088] radio resource control (RRC) signal, a media access control (MAC) control element (CE) (MACCE)). As to claim 9, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the common rate matching information includes a non-zero power channel state information reference signal (non-ZP CSI) configuration associated with a common message comprising the common codeword that is common to UEs to which the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication is directed (Hao, page 3, paragraph 33; i.e., [0033] different types of BSs may have different transmit power levels, different coverage areas, and different impact on interference in wireless network 100. For example, macro BSs may have a high transmit power level ( e.g., 5 to 40 Watts) whereas pico BSs, femto BSs, and relay BSs may have lower transmit power levels (e.g., 0.1 to 2 Watts)). As to claim 10, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 9, wherein receive the non-ZP CSI configuration from a network node (Hao, page 3, paragraph 33; i.e., [0033] different types of BSs may have different transmit power levels, different coverage areas, and different impact on interference in wireless network 100. For example, macro BSs may have a high transmit power level ( e.g., 5 to 40 Watts) whereas pico BSs, femto BSs, and relay BSs may have lower transmit power levels (e.g., 0.1 to 2 Watts)). As to claim 11, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the common rate matching information includes a zero power channel state information reference signal (ZP CSI) configuration that is common to UEs to which the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication is directed (Hao, page 5, paragraph 48; i.e., [0048] the channel state information (CSI). In some aspects, a MUMIMO signal may be constructed through superposition coding). As to claim 12, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1, further comprising a transceiver coupled to the at least one processor, the transceiver being configured to at least receive the common rate matching information for the common codeword (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part); [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE based at least in part on such information. rate matching or decoding of such signals. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword). Claim(s) 13 & 16 is/are directed to a method and system claims and they do not teach or further define over the limitations recited in claim(s) 1. Therefore, claim(s) 13 & 16 is/are also rejected for similar reasons set forth in claim(s) 1. Claim(s) 19-20, 24-27 is/are directed to a system claims and they do not teach or further define over the limitations recited in claim(s) 4-5, 9-12. Therefore, claim(s) 19-20, 24-27 is/are also rejected for similar reasons set forth in claim(s) 4-5, 9-12. Claim(s) 31, 35 & 36 is/are directed to a system claims and they do not teach or further define over the limitations recited in claim(s) 4, 9 & 11. Therefore, claim(s) 31, 35 & 36 is/are also rejected for similar reasons set forth in claim(s) 4, 9 & 11. Claim(s) 6-8, 21-23, 28-30 & 32-34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hao, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2021/0126739 A1 in view of Ma, US 2021/0258897 A1, and further in view of Xu, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2021/0282055 A1. As to claim 6, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1. But Hao-Sahin-Ma failed to teach the claim limitation wherein receive a joint indication that indicates a common rate matching pattern and a UE-specific rate matching pattern. However, Xu teaches the limitation wherein receive a joint indication that indicates a common rate matching pattern and a UE-specific rate matching pattern (Xu, figure 17-18; page 2, paragraph 20; i.e., [0020] the first rate matching resource that may be included within a first rate matching pattern also dynamically indicates a third rate matching resource included within a second rate matching pattern group that overlaps the first rate matching resource and the second rate matching resource by the at least one resource element, and identifying that the second rate matching resource indication indicates that the second rate matching resource may be not included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao-Sahin-Ma to substitute system resource from Xu for power from Hao to supporting communication for multiple communication devices (Xu, page 1, paragraph 3). As to claim 7, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1. But Hao-Sahin-Ma failed to teach the claim limitation wherein receive a control message that comprises a first indication of a common rate matching pattern and a second indication of a UE-specific rate matching pattern. However, Xu teaches the limitation wherein receive a control message that comprises a first indication of a common rate matching pattern and a second indication of a UE-specific rate matching pattern (Xu, figure 17-18; page 2, paragraph 20; i.e., [0020] the first rate matching resource that may be included within a first rate matching pattern also dynamically indicates a third rate matching resource included within a second rate matching pattern group that overlaps the first rate matching resource and the second rate matching resource by the at least one resource element, and identifying that the second rate matching resource indication indicates that the second rate matching resource may be not included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao-Sahin-Ma to substitute system resource from Xu for power from Hao-Sahin-Ma to supporting communication for multiple communication devices (Xu, page 1, paragraph 3). As to claim 8, Hao-Sahin-Ma teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 1. But Hao-Sahin-Ma failed to teach the claim limitation wherein the common rate matching information indicates a pair of a common rate matching pattern and a UE-specific rate matching pattern from a set of rate matching pairs. However, Xu teaches the limitation wherein the common rate matching information indicates a pair of a common rate matching pattern and a UE-specific rate matching pattern from a set of rate matching pairs (Xu, figure 17-18; page 2, paragraph 20; i.e., [0020] the first rate matching resource that may be included within a first rate matching pattern also dynamically indicates a third rate matching resource included within a second rate matching pattern group that overlaps the first rate matching resource and the second rate matching resource by the at least one resource element, and identifying that the second rate matching resource indication indicates that the second rate matching resource may be not included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao-Sahin-Ma to substitute system resource from Xu for power from Hao-Sahin-Ma to supporting communication for multiple communication devices (Xu, page 1, paragraph 3). Claim(s) 21-23 & 32-34 is/are directed to a system and method claims and they do not teach or further define over the limitations recited in claim(s) 6-8. Therefore, claim(s) 21-23 & 32-34 is/are also rejected for similar reasons set forth in claim(s) 6-8. Claim(s) 28-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hao, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2021/0126739 A1 in view of Ma, US 2021/0258897 A1, and further in view of Xu, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 2021/0282055 A1. As to claim 28, Hao teaches an apparatus for wireless communication at a network node, comprising: memory; and at least one processor coupled to the memory and, based at least in part on information stored in the memory, the at least one processor is configured to: configure a rate-splitting multiple user-multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO) communication to the first UE and a second UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 2, paragraph 19-20; page 3, paragraph 35; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0044] perform one or more techniques associated with signaling for rate splitting using first layers and second layers), the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication including a common codeword that is common to the first UE and the second UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; i.e., [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword; [0055] As shown in FIG. 3, and by reference number 302, the transmitter device may perform codeword generation operations to generate codewords. As shown by reference number 304, the transmitter device may perform codeword-to-layer mapping to map the codewords to first layers and/or second layers for transmission to a receiver device (e.g., BS 110 or UE 120)); configure the first rate matching pattern for the first UE for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication to the first UE and the second UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 2, paragraph 19-20; page 3, paragraph 35; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0035] UEs 120 (e.g., 120a, 120b, 120c) may be dispersed throughout wireless network 100, and each UE may be stationary or mobile. A UE may also be referred to as an access terminal, a terminal, a mobile station, a subscriber unit, a station, and/or the like; [0044] perform one or more techniques associated with signaling for rate splitting using first layers and second layers), the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication including a common codeword that is common to the first UE and the second UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; i.e., [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword; [0055] perform codeword-to-layer mapping to map the codewords to first layers and/or second layers for transmission to a receiver device). provide the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication based on the first rate matching pattern and the second rate matching pattern (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0006] performing rate matching or decoding; [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword), the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication including a common codeword that is common to the first UE and the second UE (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; page 6, paragraph 55-57; i.e., [0044] rate splitting using first layers and second layers; [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE; [0055] perform codeword generation operations to generate codewords. As shown by reference number 304, the transmitter device may perform codeword-to-layer mapping to map the codewords to first layers and/or second layers for transmission to a receiver device (e.g., BS 110 or UE 120)). But Hao failed to teach the claim limitation configure a first rate matching pattern for a first user equipment (UE); a first rate matching pattern for a first user equipment (UE); configure a second rate matching pattern for the second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE. However, Xu teaches the limitation wherein a first rate matching pattern for a first user equipment (UE); configure a first rate matching pattern for a first user equipment (UE) for a rate-splitting multiple user-multiple input multiple output (MU-MIMO) communication to the first UE and a second UE; configure a second rate matching pattern for the second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication to the first UE and the second UE (Xu, figure 17-18; page 2, paragraph 20; page 8, paragraph 94; i.e., [0020] the first rate matching resource that may be included within a first rate matching pattern; dynamically indicates a third rate matching resource included within a second rate matching pattern group that overlaps the first rate matching resource and the second rate matching resource by the at least one resource element, and identifying that the second rate matching resource indication indicates that the second rate matching resource may be not included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE; [0094] One or more control regions (e.g., CORESETs) may be configured for a set of the UEs 115. For example, one or more of the UEs 115 may monitor or search control regions for control information according to one or more search space sets, and sending control information to multiple UEs 115 and VE-specific search space sets for sending control information to a specific UE 115). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date of the claimed invention to modify Hao to substitute system resource from Xu for power from Hao to supporting communication for multiple communication devices (Xu, page 1, paragraph 3). As to claim 29, Hao-Xu teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein the first rate matching pattern comprises at least one of a first non-zero power channel state information reference signal (non-ZP CSI-RS) configuration or a first zero power channel state information reference signal (ZP CSI-RS) configuration, and the second rate matching pattern comprises at least one of a second non-ZP CSI-RS configuration or a second ZP CSI-RS configuration (Hao, page 3, paragraph 33; i.e., [0033] different types of BSs may have different transmit power levels, different coverage areas, and different impact on interference in wireless network 100. For example, macro BSs may have a high transmit power level ( e.g., 5 to 40 Watts) whereas pico BSs, femto BSs, and relay BSs may have lower transmit power levels (e.g., 0.1 to 2 Watts)). As to claim 30, Hao-Xu teaches the apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a transceiver coupled to the at least one processor, the transceiver being configured to at least provide the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication (Hao, figure 3 & 7; page 1, paragraph 6; page 4, paragraph 44; page 5, paragraph 50-52; i.e., [0006] performing rate matching or decoding based at least in part on the information identifying the mapping; [0050] decode (e.g., a common part), and at least one second layer, transmitted via interference rejection, that only a corresponding UE is to decode (e.g., a private part or a UE-specific part). Thus, performance of MU-MIMO; [0044] perform one or more techniques associated with signaling for rate splitting using first layers and second layers; [0051] provide the signaling of such information and/or for rate matching and/or decoding of signals by the UE based at least in part on such information. rate matching or decoding of such signals. [0052] As used herein, "bit" or "codeword" may refer to a coded code block or codeword or an uncoded codeblock or codeword). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 4-13, 16, 19-36 has/have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Applicant’s arguments include the failure of previously applied art to expressly disclose “common rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; UE-specific rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the common rate matching information; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the UE-specific rate matching information” (see Applicant’s response, 12/17/25, page 10-11). It is evident from the detailed mappings found in the above rejection(s) that Ma disclosed this functionality (see Ma, page 8, paragraph 90-96). Further, it is clear from the numerous teachings (previously and currently cited) that the provision for “common rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; UE-specific rate matching information that indicates a first rate matching pattern; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the common rate matching information; the first rate matching pattern indicated by the UE-specific rate matching information” was widely implemented in the networking art. Thus, Applicant’s arguments drawn toward distinction of the claimed invention and the prior art teachings on this point are not considered persuasive. Response to Arguments Applicant’s argument(s) filed 12/17/25 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Argument 1 Appellant argues on page 11-12 of the Argument (claim(s) 28-30), “Paragraph [0020] of Xu discloses that "the second rate matching resource may not be included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE," whereas claim 28 includes "configure a second rate matching pattern for a second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication to the first UE and the second UE, "identifying the rate matching resource indication conflict" of "the UE," and has not been shown to disclose "configur[ing] a second rate matching pattern for a second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE”. Examiner’s response to Argument 1: As describe in Xu (Xu, figure 17-18; page 2, paragraph 20; page 8, paragraph 94; i.e., [0020] the first rate matching resource that may be included within a first rate matching pattern; dynamically indicates a third rate matching resource included within a second rate matching pattern group that overlaps the first rate matching resource and the second rate matching resource by the at least one resource element, and identifying that the second rate matching resource indication indicates that the second rate matching resource may be not included in any rate matching pattern groups for the UE; [0094] One or more control regions (e.g., CORESETs) may be configured for a set of the UEs 115. For example, one or more of the UEs 115 may monitor or search control regions for control information according to one or more search space sets, and sending control information to multiple UEs 115 and VE-specific search space sets for sending control information to a specific UE 115), the invention disclosed the method of “configure a second rate matching pattern for the second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication to the first UE and the second UE”. Clearly, “any rate matching pattern groups for the UE” is equating to “second rate matching pattern for the second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE”. Therefore, a reasonable interpretation of "configure a second rate matching pattern for the second UE to align with the first rate matching pattern for the first UE for the rate-splitting MU-MIMO communication to the first UE and the second UE" has been made, and the Examiner believes the Hao in view of Xu are within the scope of such interpretation. Listing of Relevant Arts Ma, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 20210258897 A1 discloses rate matching and specific message. Suh, U.S. Patent/Pub. No. US 20220400475 A1 discloses common and private message associated with rate splitting. Contact Information The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. THUONG NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3864. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 9:00-6:00. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Noel Beharry can be reached on 571-270-5630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THUONG NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2416
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2022
Application Filed
May 15, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 08, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603743
CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION METHOD AND RELATED APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598609
TRANSMISSION METHOD, APPARATUS, FIRST COMMUNICATION NODE, SECOND COMMUNICATION NODE, AND MEDIUM
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587405
MULTICAST LOCAL BREAKOUT FOR CUSTOMER PREMISE EQUIPMENT IN A 5G WIRELESS WIRELINE CONVERGENCE AT AN ACCESS GATEWAY FUNCTION
3y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580991
MAINTAINING SESSION IDENTIFIERS ACROSS MULTIPLE WEBPAGES FOR CONTENT SELECTION
4y 7m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12550131
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SCHEDULING A POOL OF RESOURCES TO A PLURALITY OF USER EQUIPMENTS
5y 0m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.0%)
4y 0m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 660 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month