Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/060,425

BATTERY CELL CARRIER FOR BATTERY PACK

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 30, 2022
Examiner
CANTELMO, GREGG
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Techtronic Power Tools Technology Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
1004 granted / 1344 resolved
+9.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1367
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
39.7%
-0.3% vs TC avg
§102
24.0%
-16.0% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1344 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment In response to the amendment received on May 28, 2026: Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-9 remain withdrawn from consideration as to a non-elected invention; The drawing objection set forth in the previous Office Action is withdrawn in light of the amendment; The specification objection set forth in the previous Office Action is withdrawn in light of the amendment; The 112 rejection set forth in the previous Office Action is withdrawn in light of the amendment; The prior art rejections set forth in the previous Office Action stands. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 10-20 in the reply filed on November 4, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-9 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on November 4, 2025. Drawings The replacement sheet drawings received May 28, 2026 are acceptable for examination purposes. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zemlock et al. (U.S. Patent No. 6,627,345). As to claim 1, Zemlock discloses a battery pack 10 comprising: a housing 11 defining a cavity; a terminal assembly 12 coupled to the housing; a plurality of cells 21 configured to electrically connect to the terminal assembly 12, each cell extending 21 along a longitudinal axis; and a cell carrier 22T/22B coupled to the housing 11 to support the plurality of cells 21 within the cavity, the cell carrier 22T/22B including a plurality of channels configured to receive the plurality of cells 21, wherein at least one outer channel of the plurality of channels includes an elongate opening exposing a full length of the cell 21 contained in the at least one outer channel (see annotated Figs. 1 and 2 below). PNG media_image1.png 535 698 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 666 877 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 697 648 media_image3.png Greyscale As to claim 11, the plurality of channels includes a first row of channels and a second row of channels, wherein the first row of channels has more channels than the second row (see annotated Fig. 1 below). PNG media_image4.png 643 599 media_image4.png Greyscale As to claim 12, the at least one outer channel is in the first row of channels adjacent a side of the cell carrier (see annotated Fig. 1 below). PNG media_image5.png 660 920 media_image5.png Greyscale As to claim 13, the plurality of channels are off-set with respect to each other and arranged in a log-stack orientation (Figs. 1 and 2 above). As to claim 14, the cell carriers 22T and 22B includes circumferential walls surrounding each of the plurality of channels and the elongate opening is formed by a gap in the circumferential wall of the at least one channel (see annotated Fig. 1 below). PNG media_image6.png 716 674 media_image6.png Greyscale PNG media_image7.png 740 745 media_image7.png Greyscale As to claim 15, the cell carrier 22T/22B extends between a first side and a second side along a width of the carrier and the elongate opening is positioned at one of the first or second side. PNG media_image8.png 457 676 media_image8.png Greyscale As to claim 16, Zemlock discloses positioning fin extending from the cell carrier and wherein the housing includes a positioning groove configured to receive the positioning fin to inhibit rotation of the cell carrier relative to the housing (see annotated Fig. 2 below). PNG media_image9.png 584 690 media_image9.png Greyscale As to claim 17 the positioning fin being one of a pair of positioning fins disposed on opposite sides of the cell carrier, and the positioning groove is one of a pair of positioning grooves disposed on opposite sides of the cavity (see annotated Fig. 2 below). Each side of the carrier has a central fin portion extending outwardly into a corresponding groove in the interior of the housing halves 11 to secure the carrier and prevent movement, such as rotation, of the carrier in the housing 11 of the battery pack 10. PNG media_image10.png 923 788 media_image10.png Greyscale As to claim 18, Zemlock discloses a cell carrier 22T/22B for supporting a plurality of cells 21 in a cavity of a battery pack 10, each cell 21 extending along an axis, the cell carrier 22T/22B comprising: a housing defined by 22T or 22B (Figs. 1-2); and a plurality of channels formed in the housing 22T or 22B, wherein each of the plurality of channels is configured to receive one of the plurality of cells, the plurality of channels including a first row of channels, and a second row of channels, wherein the second row of channels has more channels than the first row of channels, and wherein the plurality of channels includes at least one outer channel having an elongate slot exposing a length of the cell positioned in the at least one outer channel (see annotated Figs. 1 and 2 below). PNG media_image11.png 660 1020 media_image11.png Greyscale PNG media_image12.png 643 599 media_image12.png Greyscale PNG media_image13.png 697 648 media_image13.png Greyscale As to claim 19, the housing comprises a first housing 22T with a set of first openings and a second housing 22B with a second set of openings, and wherein the first housing 22T is coupled to the second housing 22B via interlocking members 25/26 such that the first and second sets of openings align to form a plurality of channels (Figs. 1 and 2 above and annotated Fig. 1 below). PNG media_image14.png 660 1200 media_image14.png Greyscale As to claim 20, the elongate slot is positioned at an outer edge of the second row of channels (see annotated Fig. 2 below). PNG media_image5.png 660 920 media_image5.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 28, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As to claim 10, Applicant argues that Zemlock does not teach that only an outer channel exposes a length of a given cell. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. Zemlock teaches of a pair of end holders, similar to the instant invention, where each end holder includes an opening and the comprehensive holder, with the openings formed at the end holders, exposes the entire length of each cell, including an outer cell. PNG media_image13.png 697 648 media_image13.png Greyscale As shown above the cell carrier includes a plurality of cells in respective channels including inner and outer channels and at least one of the outer channels further include respective elongated openings, exposing a length of a cell contained in the at least one outer channel as annotated above. Applicant's arguments that claim 10 requires that only an outer channel exposes a full length of the cell is not persuasive since neither the original claim nor the proposes claim 10 recites this language (the claim does not limit a full length exposure, or such full length only to the outer channel). In response to applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., that claim 10 recites that only an outer channel exposes a length of a given cell) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). As to claim 18, Applicant argues that claim 18 recites similar subject matter as claim 10 and is therefore allowable for the same reasons. The Examiner respectfully disagrees. First the scope of the two independent claims are not identical in scope and the reply fails to provide clear guidance as to alleged differences between Zemlock and the particular features of claim 18. Applicant's arguments fail to comply with 37 CFR 1.111(b) because they amount to a general allegation that the claims define a patentable invention without specifically pointing out how the language of the claims patentably distinguishes them from the references. As Zemlock is held to anticipate claim 18 as discussed above, and in the absence of any particular pointing out of how the language of claim 18 patentably distinguishes itself from Zemlock (noting that the arguments to claim 10 above are not persuasive), the rejection stands. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGG CANTELMO whose telephone number is (571)272-1283. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 7am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at (571) 272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GREGG CANTELMO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 30, 2022
Application Filed
Dec 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 22, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 01, 2026
Response Filed
May 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706341
BATTERIES, BATTERY COMPONENTS, AND RELATED METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MITIGATING A THERMAL RUNAWAY EVENT OF A BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706324
ADDITIVES FOR ELECTROLYTE AND CATHODE MATERIAL IN Li-ION BATTERIES COMPRISING METAL-BASED CATHODE MATERIAL WHICH PRODUCES M2+ METAL IONS
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12683231
Battery housing for a vehicle battery and vehicle battery
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683229
BATTERY, POWER CONSUMPTION DEVICE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING BATTERY
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671148
BATTERY MODULE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+7.4%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1344 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month