Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/062,047

NETWORK TRANSMIT INACTIVITY TIME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 06, 2022
Examiner
TORRES, MARCOS L
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
465 granted / 692 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
744
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.9%
+12.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1-5-2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments The 112 rejections rejection were withdrawn in view of the amendment. Regarding the arguments directed to the amended limitations, please see below for the new ground of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-6, 8, 10, 28-31, 33, 35, 37-41, 43, 45 and 47 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi 20230254771 in view of Jeon 20210167930. As to claim 1, Shi discloses a user equipment (UE) [110] for wireless communication, comprising: one or more memories [800]; and one or more processors [802,820], coupled to the one or more memories (see fig. 15), configured to: receive an indication of a discontinuous transmission pattern [at] of a network entity, wherein the discontinuous transmission pattern includes of a transmit inactivity period for the network entity (see fig. 3-4, step 401; par. 0005, 0048, 0052); and adjust a monitoring or a transmission of communications during the transmit inactivity period based at least in part on the indication [DCP and/or DRX] (see par. 0003, 0049, 0054). Shi fails to disclose wherein the indication identifies one or more transmission occasions that are canceled or deactivated during the transmit inactivity period. In an analogous art, Jeon discloses wherein the indication identifies one or more transmission occasions that are canceled or deactivated during the transmit inactivity period [a wireless device may restart the BWP inactivity timer in response to receiving the second control message (e.g., MAC CE and/or DCI) deactivating at least one of SPS] (see par. 0052). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teaching for the simple purpose of minimizing battery consumption. As to claim 2, Shi discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors to adjust the monitoring or the transmission of the communications, are configured to pause monitoring for physical downlink control channel communications based at least in part on the indication (see par. 0003, 0044, 0054). As to claim 4, Shi discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the transmit inactivity period is associated with periodic transmit inactivity periods in accordance with the discontinuous transmission pattern (see par. 0043-0046). As to claim 5, Shi discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive a configuration for the discontinuous transmission pattern via an information element or dedicated radio resource control signaling (see par. 0043). As to claim 6, Shi discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the discontinuous transmission pattern is a dynamically triggered inactivity time pattern (see par. 0059, 0065-0070). As to claim 8, Shi discloses wherein the indication includes information that corresponds to a preconfigured transmit inactivity period [long or short periods] (see fig. 3-4, step 401; par. 0005, 0048, 0058-0060), and wherein the one or more processors, to adjust the power, are configured to reduce the power based at least in part on the preconfigured transmit inactivity period (see par. 0049, 0054).Shi does not use the word index. However, it would be obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art that for example the indication of 0 or 1 to indicate long or short period function as an index to indicate the preconfigured transmit inactivity period. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teaching for the simple purpose of maintaining synchronization with the BTS. As to claim 10, Shi discloses the UE of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors, are configured to adjust a power associated with reception of the communications based based at least in part on the indication (see par. 0003, 0044, 0054-0055). Regarding claims 28-31, 33, 35 and 37, they are the corresponding method claims of UE claims 1-2, 4-6, 8 and 10. Therefore, claims 28-31, 33, 35 and 37are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. Regarding claims 38-41, 43, 45 and 47, they are the corresponding means-plus-function claims of UE claims 1-2, 4-6, 8 and 10. Therefore, claims 38-41, 43, 45 and 47 are rejected for the same reasons as shown above. Claim(s) 9, 36 and 46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi in view of Jeon and further in view of Prasad 20210385747. As to claims 9, 36 and 46, Shi disclose wherein the one or more processors are configured to receive a selection from a set or list of preconfigured transmit inactivity periods [long or short periods] (see fig. 3-4, step 401; par. 0005, 0048, 0058-0060). Shi fails to disclose receiving a set or list. In An analogous art, Prasad discloses configured to receive a set or list of preconfigured transmit inactivity periods (see par. 0091-0092). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teaching for the simple purpose of maintaining synchronization with the BTS. Claim(s) 3, 7, 32, 34, 42 and 44 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shi in view of Jeon and further in view of Kang 20190319739. As to claim 3, 32 and 42, Shi discloses to receive an indication of a transmit inactivity period of a network entity (see fig. 3-4, step 401; par. 0005, 0048). Shi fails to disclose pause measuring of channel state information reference signals. In an analogous art, Kang discloses to pause measuring of channel state information reference signals based at least in part on the indication [UE performs measurement of the CSI-RS when the corresponding CSI-RS is activated and stops measurement of the CSI-RS when the corresponding CSI-RS is inactivated] (see par. 0274). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teaching for the simple purpose of performing measurement only when needed and/or desired; thereby, saving power. As to claims 7, 34 and 44, Shi discloses wherein the indication indicates a duration for the transmit inactivity period [duration for a long or short DRX period] (see par. 0058-0060). Shi fails to disclose indicates a starting offset. In an analogous art, Kang discloses wherein the indication indicates a starting offset (see par. 0272, 0274). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skills in the art before the effective filing date of the present invention to combine the teaching for the simple purpose of maintaining synchronization with the BTS. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARCOS L TORRES whose telephone number is (571)272-7926. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00 AM - 6:00 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison Slater can be reached at (571)270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MARCOS L. TORRES Primary Examiner Art Unit 2647 /MARCOS L TORRES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2022
Application Filed
May 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 06, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 06, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 29, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 16, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598454
DYNAMIC CONFIGURATION OF AN ELECTRONIC SUBSCRIBER IDENTIFICATION MODULE IN A VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12563496
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF FOR SETTING TARGET WAKE TIME PARAMETERS BASED ON RESPONSE SIGNAL RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL ELECTRONIC DEVICE OF DIFFERENT BASIC SERVICE SET
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563491
CHANNEL ACCESS MECHANISM FOR LOW POWER WAKE-UP RECEIVERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12542846
PHONE CASE FOR TRACKING AND LOCALIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12532289
LOCATION CALIBRATION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month